Liqun Zhong, Park Kee-Hong, Kim Hyo-Jung, Lee Sun-Uk, Choi Jeong-Yoon, Kim Ji-Soo
Department of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea.
Front Neurol. 2018 May 2;9:311. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00311. eCollection 2018.
Labyrinthine infarction is a cause of acute audiovestibulopathy, but can be diagnosed only in association with other infarctions involving the brainstem or cerebellar areas supplied by the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) since current imaging techniques cannot visualize an infarction confined to the labyrinth. This case series aimed to establish embolic labyrinthine infarction as a mechanism of isolated acute audiovestibulopathy.
We analyzed clinical features, imaging findings, and mechanisms of embolism in 10 patients (8 men, age range: 38-76) who had developed acute audiovestibulopathy in association with an obvious source of embolism and concurrent acute embolic infarctions in the non-anterior inferior cerebellar artery territories. The presence of audiovestibulopathy was defined when bedside or laboratory evaluation documented unilateral vestibular (head-impulse tests or caloric tests) or auditory loss (audiometry).
Six patients showed combined audiovestibulopathy while three had isolated vestibulopathy. One patient presented isolated hearing loss. Audiovestibular findings were the only abnormalities observed in nine patients. In all patients, MRIs documented single or multiple infarctions in the cerebellum ( = 5) or cerebral hemispheres ( = 5). Especially three patients showed single or scattered foci of tiny acute infarctions only in the cerebral hemispheres. Cardiac sources of embolism were found in eight, and artery-to-artery embolism was presumed in two patients.
Selective embolism to the labyrinth may be considered in patients with acute unilateral audiovestibulopathy and concurrent acute infarctions in the non-AICA territories.
迷路梗死是急性听觉前庭病的一个病因,但由于目前的成像技术无法显示局限于迷路的梗死,因此只有在与涉及由小脑前下动脉(AICA)供血的脑干或小脑区域的其他梗死相关联时才能诊断。本病例系列旨在确定栓塞性迷路梗死是孤立性急性听觉前庭病的一种机制。
我们分析了10例患者(8名男性,年龄范围:38 - 76岁)的临床特征、影像学表现和栓塞机制,这些患者发生了急性听觉前庭病,伴有明显的栓塞源以及在非小脑前下动脉区域并发急性栓塞性梗死。当床边或实验室评估记录到单侧前庭功能丧失(头脉冲试验或冷热试验)或听力损失(听力测定)时,定义为存在听觉前庭病。
6例患者表现为听觉前庭功能联合丧失,3例为孤立性前庭功能丧失。1例患者表现为孤立性听力损失。听觉前庭检查结果是9例患者中观察到的唯一异常。在所有患者中,MRI记录到小脑(n = 5)或大脑半球(n = 5)有单个或多个梗死灶。特别是3例患者仅在大脑半球出现单个或散在的微小急性梗死灶。8例发现心脏栓塞源,2例推测为动脉到动脉栓塞。
对于急性单侧听觉前庭病且在非AICA区域并发急性梗死的患者,可考虑迷路的选择性栓塞。