Suppr超能文献

食物选择动机、对个性化营养的态度和采用意向。

Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

机构信息

1School of Pharmacy,Queens University Belfast,Belfast,UK.

2Psychology Research Institute,Ulster University,Belfast,UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(14):2606-2616. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001234. Epub 2018 May 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study explored associations between food choice motives, attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition, to inform communication strategies based on consumer priorities and concerns.Design/SettingA survey was administered online which included the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) and items assessing attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

SUBJECTS

Nationally representative samples were recruited in nine EU countries (n 9381).

RESULTS

Structural equation modelling indicated that the food choice motives 'weight control', 'mood', 'health' and 'ethical concern' had a positive association and 'price' had a negative association with attitude towards, and intention to adopt, personalised nutrition. 'Health' was positively associated and 'familiarity' negatively associated with attitude towards personalised nutrition. The effects of 'weight control', 'ethical concern', 'mood' and 'price' on intention to adopt personalised nutrition were partially mediated by attitude. The effects of 'health' and 'familiarity' were fully mediated by attitude. 'Sensory appeal' was negatively and directly associated with intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalised nutrition providers may benefit from taking into consideration the importance of underlying determinants of food choice in potential users, particularly weight control, mood and price, when promoting services and in tailoring communications that are motivationally relevant.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了食物选择动机、对个性化营养的态度以及采用个性化营养的意愿之间的关联,以为基于消费者优先事项和关注点的沟通策略提供信息。

设计/设置:在线进行了一项调查,其中包括食物选择问卷(FCQ)和评估对个性化营养的态度和采用意愿的项目。

受试者

在九个欧盟国家(n=9381)招募了具有全国代表性的样本。

结果

结构方程模型表明,食物选择动机“体重控制”、“情绪”、“健康”和“道德关注”与对个性化营养的态度和采用意愿呈正相关,而“价格”则呈负相关。“健康”与对个性化营养的态度呈正相关,而“熟悉度”则呈负相关。“体重控制”、“道德关注”、“情绪”和“价格”对采用个性化营养的意愿的影响部分通过态度来介导。“健康”和“熟悉度”的影响完全通过态度来介导。“感官吸引力”与采用个性化营养的意愿呈负向直接相关。

结论

个性化营养提供者在推广服务和定制与动机相关的信息时,可以考虑到潜在用户食物选择的潜在决定因素的重要性,特别是体重控制、情绪和价格,这可能对他们有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(14):2606-2616. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001234. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Motives for consumer choice of traditional food and European food in mainland China.
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.211. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e110614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110614. eCollection 2014.
5
Association between parental motives for food choice and eating patterns of 12- to 13-year-old Norwegian children.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Nov;16(11):2023-31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004430. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
6
Regulatory focus and food choice motives. Prevention orientation associated with mood, convenience, and familiarity.
Appetite. 2014 Jul;78:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
10
Relationships Between Three Eating Behaviors and Nine Motives for Food Choices Among Brazilian Adults: A Structural Equation Model.
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Dec;130(6):2388-2409. doi: 10.1177/00315125231207270. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural translation and linguistic validation of the eating motivation survey among older adults in the Chinese context.
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 30;12:1610598. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1610598. eCollection 2025.
3
Perspective on the ethics of AI at the intersection of nutrition and behaviour change.
Front Aging. 2025 May 9;6:1423759. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1423759. eCollection 2025.
4
Protocol: Food Environment, Food Choice, Diets, and Nutrition Outcomes of Pastoralists in Africa: Scoping Review Protocol.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;21(1):e70030. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70030. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
The relationship between fear of COVID-19 and food choice motives in the Iranian population.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 13;19(8):e0308689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308689. eCollection 2024.
8
Association between nutrition self-efficacy, health locus of control and food choice motives in consumers in nine European countries.
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(3):543-558. doi: 10.1177/13591053241249863. Epub 2024 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumers' acceptance and preferences for nutrition-modified and functional dairy products: A systematic review.
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:141-154. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.031. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
3
Willingness to pay for personalised nutrition across Europe.
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Aug;26(4):640-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw045. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
Public perceptions of personalised nutrition through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory.
J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(10):1233-1242. doi: 10.1177/1359105315624750. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.
6
Food as Risk: How Eating Habits and Food Knowledge Affect Reactivity to Pictures of Junk and Healthy Foods.
Health Commun. 2016;31(5):635-42. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.987098. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
You are what you choose to eat: factors influencing young adults' food selection behaviour.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Aug;28(4):401-8. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12312. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
Motives for consumer choice of traditional food and European food in mainland China.
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.211. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2015 May;74(2):171-6. doi: 10.1017/S0029665114001529. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
10
Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e110614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110614. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验