更正：分娩期间对女性重要的因素：一项系统的定性综述。
Correction: What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.
作者信息
Downe Soo, Finlayson Kenneth, Oladapo Olufemi T, Bonet Mercedes, Gülmezoglu A Metin
出版信息
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197791. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194906.].
摘要
[本文更正了文章的数字对象标识符：10.1371/journal.pone.0194906。]
相似文献
1
Correction: What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.更正：分娩期间对女性重要的因素：一项系统的定性综述。
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197791. eCollection 2018.
2
Correction: Distance, accessibility and costs. Decision-making during childbirth in rural Sierra Leone: A qualitative study.更正：距离、可达性与成本。塞拉利昂农村地区分娩期间的决策制定：一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0196523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196523. eCollection 2018.
3
Correction: What matters most for early childhood development? Evidence from Malda district, India.更正：对幼儿发展最重要的是什么？来自印度马尔达地区的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 20;19(6):e0306034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306034. eCollection 2024.
4
Correction: Doing what matters in times of stress: No-nonsense meditation and occupational well-being in COVID-19.更正：在压力时期做重要的事：COVID-19疫情下务实的冥想与职业幸福感
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0305180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305180. eCollection 2024.
5
Correction: What is the qualitative evidence concerning the risks, diagnosis, management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the community in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta-ethnography.更正：关于英国社区胃肠道感染的风险、诊断、管理及后果的定性证据有哪些？一项系统综述和元民族志研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0230468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230468. eCollection 2020.
6
Correction: Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.更正：争议很重要：话题争议和解决方案争议对倡导科学家的可信度认知的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196620. eCollection 2018.
7
Correction: Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.更正：争议很重要：话题和解决方案争议对倡导科学家的感知可信度的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0211289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211289. eCollection 2019.
8
Correction: Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.更正：临床医生对影响剖宫产决策因素的看法：定性、定量和混合方法研究的系统评价与综合分析
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0202688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202688. eCollection 2018.
9
Correction: The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.更正：伊朗孕妇无症状菌尿的患病率：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 18;11(10):e0165114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165114. eCollection 2016.
10
Correction: Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.更正：埃塞俄比亚 eligible 妇女宫颈癌筛查的利用情况及预测因素：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
注：这里原文中“eligible”在医学语境可能有更准确含义，比如“符合条件的、适宜的”等，具体准确意思需结合更多背景信息确定，仅按要求进行了字面翻译。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294799. eCollection 2023.
引用本文的文献
1
Effect of a multifaceted intervention with audit and feedback on low-risk childbirth practice: a multicentre prospective study.多方面干预结合审核与反馈对低风险分娩实践的影响：一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 14;25(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07681-2.
2
Being in the zone during physiological birth: a comparative study of hospital and home birth environments.生理性分娩时进入状态：医院与家庭分娩环境的比较研究
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Apr 15;6:1573688. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1573688. eCollection 2025.
3
Major Factors Contributing to Positive and Negative Childbirth Experiences in Pregnant Women Living with HIV.影响感染艾滋病毒孕妇分娩经历好坏的主要因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(4):442. doi: 10.3390/bs15040442.
4
Assessing the quality of childbirth care in Mexico: findings from the maternal eCohort.评估墨西哥分娩护理质量：来自孕产妇电子队列的研究结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07397-3.
5
Practice for Parturition: Does Sexual Activity Improve Labor and Birth Outcomes?分娩练习：性行为能改善分娩及生产结局吗？
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr;54(4):1649-1669. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03117-2. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
6
Being touched by death while giving birth to life: A meta-ethnography exploring women's experiences with postpartum hemorrhage.在孕育生命时直面死亡：一项探索女性产后出血经历的元民族志研究
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Mar 26;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/200615. eCollection 2025.
7
Strategies for improving maternal care for ethnic minority women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the UK.英国改善对患有产科肛门括约肌损伤的少数民族妇女的孕产妇护理的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12441-1.
8
Evaluating patient experience in maternity services using a Bayesian belief network model.使用贝叶斯信念网络模型评估产科服务中的患者体验。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 20;20(2):e0318612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318612. eCollection 2025.
9
Associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors, and childbirth experience.社会人口学因素、产科因素与分娩体验之间的关联。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):637-646. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15076. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
10
Midwifery care in The Gambia: A focus group study with clinical midwives, midwifery students, educators and leaders on how barriers and facilitators impact quality midwifery care.冈比亚的助产护理：一项针对临床助产士、助产专业学生、教育工作者和领导者的焦点小组研究，探讨障碍和促进因素如何影响高质量的助产护理。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0318304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318304. eCollection 2025.
Zotero 插件