Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Carbon Dioxide-Guided Angiography.

BACKGROUND

Although iodinated contrast (IC) agents are commonly used in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), perioperative use in patients with renal dysfunction or IC allergies is avoided. Carbon dioxide (CO)-guided angiography is a promising alternative. We aimed to evaluate short-term and midterm outcomes of EVAR using CO-guided angiography.

METHODS

Three hundred eighty-one patients who underwent EVAR from January 2012 to September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into an IC-EVAR group (n = 351) and CO-EVAR group (n = 30). Subjects in the CO-EVAR group had severe renal dysfunction (n = 27) and IC allergy (n = 4). Intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up variables were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the IC-EVAR group, preoperative serum creatinine level was significantly higher (2.0 vs. 0.92 mg/dL, P < 0.0001) and mean IC dose was significantly lower (18 vs. 55 mL, P < 0.0001) in the CO-EVAR group. The fluoroscopy time, operative time, number of stent grafts placed, and technical success rates of the groups were similar; no type I and/or type III endoleaks were detected on completion angiography. There was no acute kidney injury and one case of intestinal necrosis in the CO-EVAR group, potentially due to cholesterol embolism. Postoperative endoleak, enlargement of aneurysms, survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and renal function change up to 3 months, postoperatively, were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CO-EVAR is technically feasible and exhibits prominent renal protection. However, consideration of the aortic lumen status remains an important challenge.