Suppr超能文献

高危队列中三种不同左心室辅助装置的临床结果及比较

Clinical Outcome and Comparison of Three Different Left Ventricular Assist Devices in a High-Risk Cohort.

作者信息

Zhigalov Konstantin, Mashhour Ahmed, Szczechowicz Marcin, Mkalaluh Sabreen, Karagezian Sergei, Gogia Irakli, Isaev Maxim, Kadyraliev Bakitbek K, Easo Jerry, Ennker Juergen, Eichstaedt Harald C, Weymann Alexander

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2018 Nov;42(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1111/aor.13140. Epub 2018 May 17.

Abstract

We present a comparison between three left ventricular assist devices (LVADs): HeartWare (HVAD) (HeartWare International Inc., Framingham, MA, USA), HeartMate II (HMII) and HeartMate III (HMIII) (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA, USA). To our knowledge, no study to date has aimed at placing these three devices in juxtaposition. Between June 2007 and June 2017, 108 consecutive patients received HMII, n = 77 (71.3%), HVAD, n = 14 (13%), or HM III, n = 17 (15.7%), for end-stage heart failure. Mean age was 63.8 ± 11.2 years (range 24-84 years), with median INTERMACS profile of 3. Preoperatively, 26 patients (24.1%) were ventilated, 17 patients (15.7%) had an intraaortic balloon pump, and 27 patients (25%) were on extracorporeal life support. Overall survival at 30 days was 70.4%, at 1 year 51.9%, and at 5 years 38% with no significant difference in survival between HMII, HVAD, and HMIII. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 113 min (range 50-371 min). Two patients received a minimally-invasive procedure. Most common adverse events were revision for bleeding (42.6%), tracheotomy (33.3%), acute kidney failure with new-onset dialysis (25%), sepsis (17.6%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (10.2%). The average duration of follow-up was 1.52 ± 2.11 years (range 0-7.95 years). The median number of readmissions was 2 (range 0-23), the median length of hospital stay as readmission was 17 days (range 0-158 days). Strong predictors of overall mortality (P < 0.05) were postoperative sepsis (OR = 5.729, 95%CI = 3.001-10.937), intraoperative/postoperative need for right ventricular mechanical support (OR = 5.232, 95%CI = 3.008-9.102), preoperative extracorporeal life support (OR = 2.980, 95%CI = 1.615-5.500), readmission because of suboptimal INR value (OR = 2.748, 95%CI = 1.045-7.226), need of inotropes over 7 days postoperatively (OR = 2.556, 95%CI = 1.432-4.562), new onset of temporary hemodialysis postoperatively (OR = 1.986, 95%CI = 1.084-3.635), and female gender (OR = 1.955, 95%CI = 1.062-3.598). No significant difference in mortality between HMII, HVAD, and HMIII was observed. The following predictors of overall mortality were identified (P < 0.05): postoperative sepsis, need for perioperative mechanical support, readmission because of suboptimal INR value, new onset of temporary hemodialysis postoperatively and female gender.

摘要

我们对三种左心室辅助装置(LVAD)进行了比较:HeartWare(HVAD)(美国马萨诸塞州弗雷明汉市HeartWare国际公司)、HeartMate II(HMII)和HeartMate III(HMIII)(美国加利福尼亚州普莱森顿市Thoratec公司)。据我们所知,迄今为止尚无研究旨在将这三种装置并列比较。2007年6月至2017年6月期间,108例连续性患者因终末期心力衰竭接受了HMII(n = 77,71.3%)、HVAD(n = 14,13%)或HM III(n = 17,15.7%)治疗。平均年龄为63.8±11.2岁(范围24 - 84岁),INTERMACS评分中位数为3。术前,26例患者(24.1%)接受机械通气,17例患者(15.7%)使用主动脉内球囊泵,27例患者(25%)接受体外生命支持。30天总体生存率为70.4%,1年为51.9%,5年为38%,HMII、HVAD和HMIII之间的生存率无显著差异。体外循环时间中位数为113分钟(范围50 - 371分钟)。2例患者接受了微创手术。最常见的不良事件是因出血进行翻修(42.6%)、气管切开(33.3%)、新发急性肾衰竭并开始透析(25%)、脓毒症(17.6%)和胃肠道出血(10.2%)。平均随访时间为1.52±2.11年(范围0 - 7.95年)。再入院次数中位数为2次(范围0 - 23次),再入院时住院时间中位数为17天(范围0 - 158天)。总体死亡率的强预测因素(P < 0.05)为术后脓毒症(OR = 5.729,95%CI = 3.001 - 10.937)、术中/术后需要右心室机械支持(OR = 5.232,95%CI = 3.008 - 9.102)、术前体外生命支持(OR = 2.980,95%CI = 1.615 - 5.500)、因国际标准化比值(INR)值不理想而再次入院(OR = 2.748,95%CI = 1.045 - 7.226)、术后7天以上需要使用血管活性药物(OR = 2.556,95%CI = 1.432 - 4.562)、术后新发临时血液透析(OR = 1.986,95%CI = 1.084 - 3.635)以及女性性别(OR = 1.955,95%CI = 1.062 - 3.598)。未观察到HMII、HVAD和HMIII之间死亡率的显著差异。确定了以下总体死亡率的预测因素(P < 0.05):术后脓毒症、围手术期需要机械支持、因INR值不理想而再次入院、术后新发临时血液透析以及女性性别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验