Suppr超能文献

挖掘设备事故中的工人安全与伤害严重程度分析。

Worker safety and injury severity analysis of earthmoving equipment accidents.

机构信息

Wayne State University, College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 5050 Anthony Wayne Dr., Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2018 Jun;65:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research on construction worker safety associated with construction equipment has mostly focused on accident type rather than injury severity and the embedded factor relationships. Significant variables and their effects on the degree of injury are examined for earthmoving equipment using data from OSHA. Four types of equipment, backhoe, bulldozer, excavator, and scraper are included in the study. Accidents involving on-foot workers and equipment operators are investigated collectively, as well as separately.

METHODS

Cross tabulation analysis was conducted to establish the associations between selected categorical variables, using degree of injury as a dichotomous dependent variable (fatal vs. nonfatal) and a number of independent variables having different values. Odds ratios were calculated to determine how much a certain variable/factor increases the odds of fatality in an accident, and the odds ratios were ranked to determine the relative impact of a given factor.

RESULTS

It was found that twelve variables were significantly associated with injury severity. Rankings based on odds ratios showed that inadequate safety training (2.54), missing equipment protective system (2.38), being a non-union worker (2.26), being an equipment operator (1.93), and being on or around inadequately maintained equipment (1.58) produced higher odds for fatality.

CONCLUSION

A majority of the earthmoving equipment accidents resulted in fatality. Backhoes were the most common equipment involved in accidents and fatalities. Struck-by accidents were the most prevalent and most fatal. Non-OSHA compliant safety training, missing seatbelt, operator not using seatbelt, malfunctioning back-up alarms, and poorly maintained equipment were factors contributing to accidents and fatalities. On-foot workers experienced a higher number of accidents than operators, while fatality odds were higher for the operators. Practical applications: Safety professionals should benefit from our findings in planning and delivering training and providing oversight to workers in earthmoving equipment operations.

摘要

简介

建筑工人安全与建筑设备相关的研究大多集中在事故类型上,而不是伤害严重程度和嵌入因素关系上。本研究使用 OSHA 的数据,对土方设备的重要变量及其对伤害程度的影响进行了检查。研究包括四种设备:反铲挖掘机、推土机、挖掘机和刮土机。本研究综合调查了涉及步行工人和设备操作人员的事故,也分别进行了调查。

方法

交叉表分析用于建立选定分类变量之间的关联,使用伤害程度作为二项因变量(致命与非致命)和具有不同值的多个独立变量。计算比值比以确定某个变量/因素在事故中增加致命的可能性有多大,然后对比值比进行排名以确定给定因素的相对影响。

结果

发现有 12 个变量与伤害严重程度显著相关。基于比值比的排名显示,安全培训不足(2.54)、设备保护系统缺失(2.38)、非工会工人(2.26)、设备操作人员(1.93)以及在维护不当的设备上或周围(1.58),这些因素增加了致命的可能性。

结论

大多数土方设备事故导致死亡。反铲挖掘机是事故和死亡中最常见的设备。撞击事故最为普遍,也最为致命。不符合 OSHA 要求的安全培训、缺失安全带、操作人员未使用安全带、倒车警报器故障以及设备维护不善是导致事故和死亡的因素。步行工人的事故比操作人员多,而操作人员的致命可能性更高。

实际应用

安全专业人员应从我们的发现中受益,以便在计划和提供培训以及对土方设备操作人员进行监督方面提供帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验