Suppr超能文献

卫生专业短缺地区的手术程序:手术激励支付计划的影响。

Surgical Procedures in Health Professional Shortage Areas: Impact of a Surgical Incentive Payment Plan.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Surgery. 2018 Aug;164(2):189-194. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.03.017.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Affordable Care Act established a Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services based 10% reimbursement bonus for general surgeons in Health Professional Shortage Areas. We sought to assess the impact of the Affordable Care Act Surgery Incentive Payment on surgical procedures performed in Health Professional Shortage Areas.

METHODS

Hospital utilization data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, were used to categorize hospitals according to Health Professional Shortage Area location. A difference-in-differences analysis measured the effect of the Surgery Incentive Payment on year-to-year differences for inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures by hospital type pre- (2006-2010) versus post- (2011-2015) Surgery Incentive Payment implementation.

RESULTS

Among 409 unique hospitals that performed surgical procedures for at least 1 year of the study period, 2 performed surgery in a designated Health Professional Shortage Area. The two Health Professional Shortage Area -designated hospitals were located in a rural area, were non-teaching hospitals, and had 196 and 202 hospital beds, respectively. After the enactment of the Surgery Incentive Payment, while non- Health Professional Shortage Areas had only a modest relative decrease in total inpatient procedures (Pre-Surgery Incentive Payment: 4,666,938 versus Post-Surgery Incentive Payment: 4,451,612; Δ-4.6%), the proportional decrease in inpatient surgical procedures at Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals was more marked (Pre-Surgery Incentive Payment: 25,830 versus Post-Surgery Incentive Payment: 21,503; Δ-16.7%). In contrast, Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals proportionally had a greater increase in total outpatient procedures (Pre-Surgery Incentive Payment: 17,840 versus Post-Surgery Incentive Payment: 22,375: Δ+25.4%) versus non- Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals (Pre-Surgery Incentive Payment: 5,863,300 versus Post-Surgery Incentive Payment: 6,156,138; Δ+4.9%). Based on the difference-in-differences analysis, the increase in the trend of surgical procedures at Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals was much more notable after Surgery Incentive Payment implementation (Δ+75.2%).

CONCLUSION

The Medicare Surgery Incentive Payment program was associated with an increase in the number of surgical procedures performed at Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals relative to non-Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals during the study period, reversing the trend from negative to positive.

摘要

简介

《平价医疗法案》为在卫生专业人员短缺地区的普通外科医生设立了基于 10%的报销奖金的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心。我们试图评估平价医疗法案手术激励支付对卫生专业人员短缺地区实施的手术程序的影响。

方法

利用加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日的医院利用数据,根据卫生专业人员短缺地区的位置对医院进行分类。差异-差异分析通过医院类型的预(2006-2010 年)与后(2011-2015 年)手术激励支付实施之间的年度差异来衡量手术激励支付对住院和门诊手术程序的影响。

结果

在 409 家在研究期间至少进行了 1 年手术的独特医院中,有 2 家医院在指定的卫生专业人员短缺地区进行手术。这两家卫生专业人员短缺地区指定的医院位于农村地区,是非教学医院,分别有 196 张和 202 张病床。在手术激励支付法案颁布后,非卫生专业人员短缺地区的总住院手术数量仅略有相对减少(手术激励支付前:4666938 次与手术激励支付后:4451612 次;Δ-4.6%),而卫生专业人员短缺地区医院的住院手术数量减少更为明显(手术激励支付前:25830 次与手术激励支付后:21503 次;Δ-16.7%)。相比之下,卫生专业人员短缺地区医院的门诊手术数量呈相对增长(手术激励支付前:17840 次与手术激励支付后:22375 次;Δ+25.4%),而非卫生专业人员短缺地区医院的门诊手术数量呈相对增长(手术激励支付前:5863300 次与手术激励支付后:6156138 次;Δ+4.9%)。基于差异-差异分析,手术激励支付实施后,卫生专业人员短缺地区医院手术程序的趋势增长更为显著(Δ+75.2%)。

结论

在研究期间,与非卫生专业人员短缺地区医院相比,医疗保险手术激励支付计划与卫生专业人员短缺地区医院手术数量的增加有关,扭转了从负向转为正向的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验