Study performed at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, United States.
Study performed at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, United States.
Injury. 2018 Jul;49(7):1348-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 31.
The purpose of this project was to compare the rates of infections, nonunions, malunions, and secondary operations in tibia fractures resultant from low energy GSWs versus those seen in open and closed tibia fractures resultant from blunt trauma. A secondary objective was to assess the utility of using the traditional Gustilo-Anderson classification system for open fractures to describe fractures secondary to low energy GSW.
A retrospective review of 327 patients with tibia shaft fractures was conducted at our level I trauma center. Patients underwent a variety of interventions depending on their injury. Standard fixation techniques were utilized. Outcome measures include: mechanism of injury, rates of superficial and deep infection, nonunion, malunion, and secondary operations.
Deep infection after low energy GSW tibia fractures was uncommon and seen in only 2.3% of patients. Rates of infection after low energy GSWs were similar to low and high energy closed tibia fractures resultant from blunt trauma, but significantly less than that seen in open type II (25%, p < 0.05), type IIIA (19.5%, p < 0.05), and type IIIB fractures (47%, p < 0.01). There were no nonunions following GSW fractures, versus 3.7% after closed tibia fractures from blunt trauma (p = 0.2). Nonunions were more common after open fractures from blunt trauma (11%, p < 0.05) versus GSWs. Differences in infection and nonunion were associated with more secondary operations (18%, p < 0.01) in the open tibia fracture group compared with GSWs (2.3%) and closed fractures (7.9% p = 0.19).
While GSWs are traditionally thought of as open injuries, low energy GSW tibia fractures had a low rate of infection and no nonunions, and resulted in a reoperation rate similar to closed blunt tibia shaft fractures and significantly lower than open tibia fractures.
本项目旨在比较低能 GSW 导致的胫骨骨折的感染率、不愈合率、畸形愈合率和二次手术率与开放性和闭合性胫骨骨折所致的感染率、不愈合率、畸形愈合率和二次手术率。次要目标是评估传统的 Gustilo-Anderson 分类系统用于描述低能 GSW 引起的开放性骨折的实用性。
在我们的一级创伤中心,对 327 例胫骨骨干骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。根据患者的损伤情况,患者接受了各种干预措施。采用标准固定技术。观察指标包括:损伤机制、浅表和深部感染、不愈合、畸形愈合和二次手术的发生率。
低能 GSW 导致的胫骨骨折后深部感染并不常见,仅见于 2.3%的患者。低能 GSW 后感染率与低能和高能闭合性胫骨骨折所致的感染率相似,但明显低于开放性 II 型(25%,p<0.05)、IIIA 型(19.5%,p<0.05)和 IIIB 型骨折(47%,p<0.01)。GSW 骨折后无不愈合,而闭合性胫骨骨折所致不愈合率为 3.7%(p=0.2)。开放性骨折后不愈合更为常见(11%,p<0.05),而非 GSW 骨折。感染和不愈合的差异与更多的二次手术(18%,p<0.01)相关,开放性胫骨骨折组与 GSW 组(2.3%)和闭合性骨折组(7.9%,p=0.19)相比。
虽然 GSW 通常被认为是开放性损伤,但低能 GSW 胫骨骨折的感染率低,无不愈合,再手术率与闭合性胫骨骨干骨折相似,明显低于开放性胫骨骨折。