Yang Yang, Liu Zhong-Yu, Zhang Liang-Ming, Pang Mao, Chhantyal Kishor, Wu Wen-Bin, Chen Zi-Hao, Luo Chun-Xiao, Rong Li-Min, Liu Bin
Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e602-e610. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.049. Epub 2018 May 17.
We sought to evaluate 5-year outcomes between microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive (MIS) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Sixty single-level MIS and open surgeries were performed (30 patients in either group). Perioperative parameters including operative duration, intraoperative estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, postoperative analgesic usage, ambulatory time, and complications were recorded. Visual analog scale (back and leg), Japanese Orthopaedics Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were obtained. Finally, self-evaluation of surgical outcomes (modified MacNab criteria), interbody fusion rate (Bridwell grade 1), and prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration were assessed.
Intraoperative estimated blood loss and postoperative analgesia usage were reduced in the MIS group, and patients undergoing microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF ambulated earlier than those receiving open TLIF postoperatively. Nevertheless, surgical duration and fluoroscopy time were prolonged in the MIS group. Complication incidences were similar in both groups. Visual analog scale (back and leg), Japanese Orthopaedics Association, and Oswestry Disability Index were improved at 1 month, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively in both groups when compared with preoperative scores. Significant improvements in these scores were found in the MIS group at 1 month postoperatively, while at 2 years and 5 years postoperatively, both groups revealed comparable aforementioned scores. Excellent and perfect scale rating, interbody fusion rate, and adjacent segment degeneration prevalence between the groups were almost similar.
Microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF is comparable with open TLIF in terms of 5-year outcomes with additional benefits of reduced intraoperative iatrogenic injury, decreased initial pain, minimized activity restrictions, and accelerated ambulation recovery after surgery.
我们试图评估显微内镜辅助下微创(MIS)与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的5年疗效。
进行了60例单节段MIS手术和开放手术(每组30例患者)。记录围手术期参数,包括手术时间、术中估计失血量、透视时间、术后镇痛药物使用情况、下床活动时间和并发症。获取视觉模拟评分(背部和腿部)、日本骨科协会评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数。最后,评估手术效果的自我评估(改良MacNab标准)、椎间融合率(Bridwell 1级)和相邻节段退变的发生率。
MIS组术中估计失血量和术后镇痛药物使用量减少,接受显微内镜辅助MIS-TLIF的患者术后下床活动时间比接受开放TLIF的患者更早。然而,MIS组的手术时间和透视时间延长。两组的并发症发生率相似。与术前评分相比,两组术后1个月、2年和5年时视觉模拟评分(背部和腿部)、日本骨科协会评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数均有所改善。MIS组术后1个月时这些评分有显著改善,而术后2年和5年时,两组上述评分相当。两组之间的优良和完美量表评分、椎间融合率和相邻节段退变发生率几乎相似。
显微内镜辅助MIS-TLIF在5年疗效方面与开放TLIF相当,且具有减少术中医源性损伤、减轻初始疼痛、最小化活动限制以及加速术后下床活动恢复等额外益处。