Osteguin Vangelina, Cheng Thomas W, Farber Alik, Eslami Mohammad H, Kalish Jeffrey A, Jones Douglas W, Rybin Denis, Raulli Stephen J, Siracuse Jeffrey J
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 18.
Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) utilize hospital resources at high rates. One major driver for resource utilization is emergency department (ED) visits. Our goal was to assess perioperative ED visits after lower extremity bypass (LEB) for CLI.
All patients undergoing LEB for CLI from 2008 to 2017 at our institution were analyzed. ED visits and details of the visit within 30 and 90 days of discharge from index admission were recorded. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for any ED presentation and ED presentation without hospital admission.
There were 317 patients identified who underwent infrainguinal LEB for CLI. Average age was 66 years, and 60.6% of patients were male. Within 30 and 90 days, 24.3% and 36.3% presented to the ED overall, and 16.7% and 26.5% of all postoperative patients had an ED presentation without hospital admission, respectively. Most common reasons for any ED visits and for ED visits without admission within 30 days were wound complications (22.1% and 20.8%), cardiac complications (16.9% and 17%), and ipsilateral leg pain (10.4% and 11.3%), respectively. Cryopreserved vein bypass (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-8.84, P = 0.046) and index length of stay (LOS) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001) predicted any 30-day ED visit. Active leg infection at the time of bypass (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.21-4.58, P = 0.012) and index LOS (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.004-1.09, P = 0.033) predicted 30-day ED presentation without hospital admission. Most common reasons for any ED visit and for ED visits without admission within 90 days were surgical wound complications (15.8% and 14.3%), cardiac complications (14.9% and 14.3%), and nonsurgical wounds (9.6% and 9.5%), respectively. Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.52-4.93, P = 0.001) and index LOS (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, P = 0.017) predicted any 90-day ED visit. CRI (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.81-6.17, P = 0.001) predicted 90-day ED presentation without hospital admission. For multiple ED visits within 90 days, there were 5 patients each with 5 ED visits, 12 each with 4 ED visits, 26 each with 3 ED visits, and 47 each with 2 ED visits.
There is a high rate of ED utilization in CLI patients after LEB. Targeting these patients with closer follow-up and improved outpatient ambulatory access could assist in decreasing the frequency of postoperative ED visits. Particular areas of targeted improvement are those patients who presented to the ED and were not admitted.
严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者大量使用医院资源。资源利用的一个主要驱动因素是急诊科(ED)就诊。我们的目标是评估CLI患者下肢旁路移植术(LEB)围手术期的ED就诊情况。
分析了2008年至2017年在我院接受LEB治疗的所有CLI患者。记录了首次入院出院后30天和90天内的ED就诊情况及就诊细节。进行多变量分析以确定任何ED就诊和未住院的ED就诊的危险因素。
共确定317例接受腹股沟下LEB治疗的CLI患者。平均年龄66岁,60.6%为男性。在30天和90天内,分别有24.3%和36.3%的患者前往ED就诊,所有术后患者中分别有16.7%和26.5%的患者前往ED就诊但未住院。30天内任何ED就诊和未住院的ED就诊的最常见原因分别是伤口并发症(22.1%和20.8%)、心脏并发症(16.9%和17%)以及同侧腿痛(10.4%和11.3%)。冷冻保存静脉旁路移植术(优势比[OR] 3.0,95%置信区间[CI] 1.02 - 8.84,P = 0.046)和首次住院时长(LOS)(OR 1.09,95% CI 1.04 - 1.15,P < 0.001)可预测30天内的任何ED就诊。旁路手术时腿部存在活动性感染(OR 2.35,95% CI 1.21 - 4.58,P = 0.012)和首次住院时长(OR 1.05,95% CI 1.004 - 1.09,P = 0.033)可预测30天内未住院的ED就诊。90天内任何ED就诊和未住院的ED就诊的最常见原因分别是手术伤口并发症(15.8%和14.3%)、心脏并发症(14.9%和14.3%)以及非手术伤口(9.6%和9.5%)。慢性肾功能不全(CRI)(OR 2.73,95% CI 1.52 - 4.93,P = 0.001)和首次住院时长(OR 1.07,95% CI 1.01 - 1.12,P = 0.017)可预测90天内的任何ED就诊。CRI(OR 3.34,95% CI 1.81 - 6.17,P = 0.001)可预测90天内未住院的ED就诊。对于90天内多次ED就诊的情况,有5例患者各就诊5次,12例各就诊4次,26例各就诊3次,47例各就诊2次。
LEB术后CLI患者的ED利用率很高。对这些患者进行更密切的随访并改善门诊就诊途径有助于减少术后ED就诊频率。需要重点改善的特定领域是那些前往ED就诊但未住院的患者。