• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What is a 'complex systematic review'? Criteria, definition, and examples.

作者信息

Mahtani Kamal R, Jefferson Tom, Heneghan Carl, Nunan David, Aronson Jeffrey K

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Aug;23(4):127-130. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110965. Epub 2018 May 19.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110965
PMID:29778991
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
What is a 'complex systematic review'? Criteria, definition, and examples.什么是“复杂系统评价”？标准、定义及示例。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Aug;23(4):127-130. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110965. Epub 2018 May 19.
2
"A little learning is a dangerous thing": A call for better understanding of the term 'systematic review'.“一知半解是危险的”：呼吁更好地理解“系统评价”一词。
Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:356-360. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane's Public Health and Health Systems Network.利益相关者参与系统评价：来自Cochrane公共卫生与卫生系统网络的经验教训
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1210-1215. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306252.
4
Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol.解决初级保健中复杂干预措施的证据与实践差距：一项综述方案的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 23;4(6):e005548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548.
5
Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks.在系统综述概述、meta-流行病学研究和教科书中使用的系统综述的定义。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0.
6
Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews.概述作者很少为包含在他们的概述中的系统评价下定义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May;109:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
7
A letter to the Editor re: 'Infective complications of cosmetic tourism: A systematic literature review'.致编辑的一封信：关于“美容旅游的感染性并发症：系统文献综述”
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Nov;86:209-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.025. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.发表于高影响力护理期刊的系统评价的方法学质量：文献综述
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):315-32. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12132. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
Fallacious, misleading and unhelpful: The case for removing 'systematic review' from bioethics nomenclature.错误的、误导的和无益的：从生物伦理学命名中删除“系统评价”的理由。
Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):635-647. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13024. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
Systematic review and Knowledge Translation: A framework for synthesizing heterogeneous research evidence.系统评价与知识转化：整合异质性研究证据的框架
Work. 2017;57(4):485-499. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172577.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of the EU's Health Technology Assessment regulation: where does existing methods guidance require concretization and what are the relevant methodological options?欧盟卫生技术评估法规的实施：现有方法指南在哪些方面需要具体化，相关的方法选项有哪些？
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 6;41(1):e9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004793.
2
Population-level interventions for the primary prevention of dementia: a complex evidence review.痴呆症一级预防的人群层面干预措施：一项复杂的证据综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 10;70:102538. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102538. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Data extraction and comparison for complex systematic reviews: a step-by-step guideline and an implementation example using open-source software.
数据提取和比较复杂的系统评价：一个逐步的指南和一个使用开源软件的实施示例。
Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 1;12(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02322-1.
4
Evidence-Based Surgery: What Can Intra-Operative Images Contribute?循证外科：术中影像有何作用？
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 27;12(21):6809. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216809.
5
Understanding the role of GPs' gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence.理解全科医生在初级保健中诊断癌症时的直觉作用：现有证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e612-e621. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712301. Print 2020 Sep.