Vaxxas Pty Ltd, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Working in Tandem Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 18;36(26):3779-3788. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.053. Epub 2018 May 17.
Injection using needle and syringe (N&S) is the most widely used method for vaccination, but requires trained healthcare workers. Fear of needles, risk of needle-stick injury, and the need to reconstitute lyophilised vaccines, are also drawbacks. The Nanopatch (NP) is a microarray skin patch comprised of a high-density array of microprojections dry-coated with vaccine that is being developed to address these shortcomings. Here we report a randomised, partly-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that represents the first use in humans of the NP to deliver a vaccine.
Healthy volunteers were vaccinated once with one of the following: (1) NPs coated with split inactivated influenza virus (A/California/07/2009 [H1N1], 15 µg haemagglutinin (HA) per dose), applied to the volar forearm (NP-HA/FA), n = 15; (2) NPs coated with split inactivated influenza virus (A/California/07/2009 [H1N1], 15 µg HA per dose), applied to the upper arm (NP-HA/UA), n = 15; (3) Fluvax® 2016 containing 15 µg of the same H1N1 HA antigen injected intramuscularly (IM) into the deltoid (IM-HA/D), n = 15; (4) NPs coated with excipients only, applied to the volar forearm (NP-placebo/FA), n = 5; (5) NPs coated with excipients only applied to the upper arm (NP-placebo/UA), n = 5; or (6) Saline injected IM into the deltoid (IM-placebo/D), n = 5. Antibody responses at days 0, 7, and 21 were measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and microneutralisation (MN) assays.
NP vaccination was safe and acceptable; all adverse events were mild or moderate. Most subjects (55%) receiving patch vaccinations (HA or placebo) preferred the NP compared with their past experience of IM injection with N&S (preferred by 24%). The antigen-vaccinated groups had statistically higher HAI titres at day 7 and 21 compared with baseline (p < 0.0001), with no statistical differences between the treatment groups (p > 0.05), although the group sizes were small. The geometric mean HAI titres at day 21 for the NP-HA/FA, NP-HA/UA and IM-HA/D groups were: 335 (189-593 95% CI), 160 (74-345 95% CI), and 221 (129-380 95% CI) respectively. A similar pattern of responses was seen with the MN assays. Application site reactions were mild or moderate, and more marked with the influenza vaccine NPs than with the placebo or IM injection.
Influenza vaccination using the NP appeared to be safe, and acceptable in this first time in humans study, and induced similar immune responses to vaccination by IM injection.
使用针和注射器(N&S)进行注射是最广泛使用的疫苗接种方法,但需要经过培训的医护人员。对针头的恐惧、针头刺伤的风险以及需要对冻干疫苗进行再配制,也是缺点。纳米贴片(NP)是一种由高密度微针阵列组成的微阵列皮肤贴片,用疫苗干式涂覆,旨在解决这些缺点。在这里,我们报告了一项随机、部分盲、安慰剂对照试验,这是 NP 首次在人类中用于疫苗接种。
健康志愿者接受以下一种疫苗接种:(1)涂有裂解灭活流感病毒(A/加利福尼亚/07/2009 [H1N1],每剂量 15µg 血凝素(HA)的 NP),应用于掌侧前臂(NP-HA/FA),n=15;(2)涂有裂解灭活流感病毒(A/加利福尼亚/07/2009 [H1N1],每剂量 15µg HA)的 NP,应用于上臂(NP-HA/UA),n=15;(3)Fluvax® 2016 含有相同的 H1N1 HA 抗原 15µg,肌肉内注射(IM)入三角肌(IM-HA/D),n=15;(4)仅涂有赋形剂的 NP,应用于掌侧前臂(NP-安慰剂/FA),n=5;(5)仅涂有赋形剂的 NP,应用于上臂(NP-安慰剂/UA),n=5;或(6)生理盐水 IM 入三角肌(IM-安慰剂/D),n=5。在第 0、7 和 21 天通过血凝抑制(HAI)和微量中和(MN)测定测量抗体反应。
NP 疫苗接种安全且可接受;所有不良事件均为轻度或中度。与过去接受 N&S 肌内注射(24%)相比,接受贴剂(HA 或安慰剂)接种的大多数受试者(55%)更喜欢 NP(55%)。与基线相比,接种抗原的组在第 7 天和第 21 天的 HAI 滴度均显著升高(p<0.0001),但治疗组之间无统计学差异(p>0.05),尽管组大小较小。NP-HA/FA、NP-HA/UA 和 IM-HA/D 组在第 21 天的几何平均 HAI 滴度分别为:335(189-593 95%CI)、160(74-345 95%CI)和 221(129-380 95%CI)。微量中和测定也显示出类似的反应模式。接种部位反应为轻度或中度,流感疫苗 NP 比安慰剂或 IM 注射更明显。
在首次人体研究中,使用 NP 进行流感疫苗接种似乎是安全且可接受的,并诱导了与 IM 注射相当的免疫反应。