• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

p2PSA%和前列腺健康指数在前列腺癌检测中的应用:在一家三级医疗中心进行的前瞻性队列研究。

The application of p2PSA% and prostate health index in prostate cancer detection: A prospective cohort in a Tertiary Medical Center.

机构信息

Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.

Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuanshan Branch, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 2):260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.001
PMID:29779925
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) with low specificity that causes unnecessary prostate biopsies increases clinical morbidities, psychological stress, and medical expenses. We aimed to test the accuracy and cutoff value of Prostate Health Index (PHI) in men for prostate cancer detection.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 213 men who underwent prostate biopsy with PSA≦10 ng/ml or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination. Total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA) and p2PSA levels were measured by serum samples before prostate biopsy. PHI was calculated as (p2PSA/fPSA) × √tPSA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to predict the risk of cancer and detect clinically significant prostate cancer.

RESULTS

33 (27.0%) patients were confirmed with the diagnoses of prostate cancer by prostate biopsy. The levels of p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI showed statistically significant differences between prostate cancer patients and non-cancer patients. %p2PSA and PHI had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.723 and 0.772 (both p < 0.001), respectively, predicting cancer detection at biopsy than other predictors (tPSA, fPSA, %fPSA, and PSA density (AUC: 0.544, 0.538, 0.593, and 0.664, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression, %p2PSA had a statistical significant odds ratio 8.51 (p = 0.003) and PHI had an odds ratio with marginal significance 4.18 (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

%p2PSA and PHI increased the diagnostic accuracy with significantly greater sensitivity and specificity than tPSA. We determined an optimal cut-off value of PHI among Taiwanese population. These findings support the usefulness in the decisional process of prostate biopsy.

摘要

背景/目的:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)特异性低,导致不必要的前列腺活检增加了临床发病率、心理压力和医疗费用。我们旨在测试前列腺健康指数(PHI)在男性前列腺癌检测中的准确性和临界值。

方法

我们前瞻性地招募了 213 名前列腺活检的男性,这些男性的 PSA 值≦10ng/ml 或直肠指检异常。在前列腺活检前,通过血清样本测量总 PSA(tPSA)、游离 PSA(fPSA)和 p2PSA 水平。PHI 通过(p2PSA/fPSA)×√tPSA 计算得出。多变量逻辑回归分析用于预测癌症风险和检测临床显著前列腺癌。

结果

33 名(27.0%)患者经前列腺活检确诊为前列腺癌。前列腺癌患者和非癌症患者的 p2PSA、%p2PSA 和 PHI 水平存在统计学差异。%p2PSA 和 PHI 在预测活检时癌症检测方面具有最高的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),分别为 0.723 和 0.772(均 p<0.001),优于其他预测因子(tPSA、fPSA、%fPSA 和 PSA 密度 AUC:0.544、0.538、0.593 和 0.664)。在多变量逻辑回归中,%p2PSA 具有统计学显著的优势比 8.51(p=0.003),而 PHI 具有边际显著的优势比 4.18(p=0.06)。

结论

%p2PSA 和 PHI 提高了诊断准确性,具有显著更高的敏感性和特异性,优于 tPSA。我们确定了台湾人群中 PHI 的最佳临界值。这些发现支持在前列腺活检决策过程中的有用性。

相似文献

1
The application of p2PSA% and prostate health index in prostate cancer detection: A prospective cohort in a Tertiary Medical Center.p2PSA%和前列腺健康指数在前列腺癌检测中的应用:在一家三级医疗中心进行的前瞻性队列研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 2):260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly improves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)同工型 p2PSA 显著提高了总 PSA 为 2.0-10ng/ml 的患者初始扩展前列腺活检中前列腺癌的预测能力:一项临床环境中前瞻性研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.052. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
3
Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study.血清同工型 [-2]前列腺特异性抗原衍生物在总 PSA 范围为 2-10ng/ml 时显著改善了初始活检前列腺癌的预测:一项多中心欧洲研究。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6):986-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
4
Usefulness of the prostate health index in predicting the presence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer among Korean men: a prospective observational study.前列腺健康指数在预测韩国男性前列腺癌的存在和侵袭性方面的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Urol. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00897-2.
5
Clinical performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives, %p2PSA and the prostate health index (PHI), in men with a family history of prostate cancer: results from a multicentre European study, the PROMEtheuS project.家族性前列腺癌病史男性患者中血清前列腺特异性抗原同工型 [-2]proPSA(p2PSA)及其衍生物%p2PSA 和前列腺健康指数(PHI)的临床性能:来自多国欧洲研究——PROMEtheuS 项目的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):313-21. doi: 10.1111/bju.12217.
6
Prostate Health Index outperforms other PSA derivatives in predicting a positive biopsy in men with tPSA <10 ng/mL: Largest prospective cohort in Taiwan.前列腺健康指数在预测 tPSA<10ng/ml 男性的前列腺活检阳性方面优于其他 PSA 衍生物:来自台湾的最大前瞻性队列研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Oct;82(10):772-777. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000160.
7
Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivates, %p2PSA, prostate health index and prostate dimension-adjusted related index in the detection of prostate cancer at first biopsy: an exploratory, prospective study.首次活检时前列腺特异性抗原异构体p2PSA及其衍生物、%p2PSA、前列腺健康指数和前列腺尺寸调整相关指数在前列腺癌检测中的评估:一项探索性前瞻性研究。
Urol Int. 2014;93(2):135-45. doi: 10.1159/000356240. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Clinical performance of serum isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), and its derivatives %p2PSA and the Prostate Health Index, in men aged <60 years: results from a multicentric European study.血清同工型[-2]前列腺特异性抗原(p2PSA)及其衍生物%p2PSA和前列腺健康指数在60岁以下男性中的临床性能:一项欧洲多中心研究的结果
BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):913-20. doi: 10.1111/bju.12718. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
The percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform [-2]proPSA and the Prostate Health Index improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant prostate cancer at initial and repeat biopsy compared with total PSA and percentage free PSA in men aged ≤65 years.与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离PSA百分比相比,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)异构体[-2]前体PSA的百分比及前列腺健康指数可提高≤65岁男性初次和重复活检时临床相关前列腺癌的诊断准确性。
BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):72-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13139. Epub 2015 May 24.
10
Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.在中国男性前列腺特异性抗原为 10-20ng/ml 且直肠指检正常的情况下,延长使用前列腺健康指数和 [-2]pro-前列腺特异性抗原百分比。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):336-42. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects.前列腺癌诊断中的液体生物标志物:现状与新兴前景
World J Mens Health. 2025 Jan;43(1):8-27. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230386. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
2
Value of serum free prostate-specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.血清游离前列腺特异性抗原密度在前列腺癌诊断中的价值。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03448-w. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate Health Index in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection.
前列腺健康指数密度在临床意义重大的前列腺癌检测方面优于前列腺健康指数。
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 19;11:772182. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772182. eCollection 2021.
4
Prostate Health Index and Prostate Health Index Density as Diagnostic Tools for Improved Prostate Cancer Detection.前列腺健康指数和前列腺健康指数密度作为提高前列腺癌检测的诊断工具。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 21;2020:9872146. doi: 10.1155/2020/9872146. eCollection 2020.
5
Explication of the roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) as diagnostic and predictor tools for prostate cancer in equivocal PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL.解读前列腺健康指数(PHI)和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)在4-10 ng/mL模棱两可的前列腺特异抗原(PSA)范围内作为前列腺癌诊断和预测工具的作用。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Aug;27(8):1975-1984. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 10.