• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性反肩关节置换术后修复肩袖撕裂性关节炎和骨关节炎的风险和风险因素:北欧关节置换登记协会研究。

Risk and risk factors for revision after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis: a Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1596-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.060. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.060
PMID:29779980
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has gained increasing popularity in the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of RSA and the risk factors for revision following RSA.

METHODS

RSA patients with CTA or osteoarthritis were identified from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association registry data (2004-2013). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate survival probabilities. Cox multiple regression analysis was used to calculate revision rates adjusted for sex, arthroplasty brand, age (<70 years), and year of surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 1904 patients with RSA (1904 RSAs) (69% women; mean age, 74 years; age range, 35-97 years). Revision was performed in 95 patients (5%), with a 10-year cumulative revision rate of 0.91. The most common reason for revision was infection (n = 42), followed by loosening (n = 16) and instability (n = 12). Most revisions occurred less than 6 months after the primary operation. Men had a significantly increased risk of revision compared with women (risk ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-6.1). The most common implants were the Delta Xtend (n = 1366) and Delta Mark III (n = 246). The risk of revision of the Delta Mark III was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.3) compared with the Delta Xtend. Age and year of surgery were not statistically significantly associated with risk of revision.

CONCLUSION

The overall midterm risk of revision after RSA for CTA was low (5%). The most common reason for early revision was infection. Male sex was associated with a significantly increased risk of revision.

摘要

背景

反向肩关节置换术(RSA)在治疗肩袖撕裂性关节炎(CTA)方面越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在评估 RSA 的生存率以及 RSA 后翻修的风险因素。

方法

从北欧关节置换注册协会(NARA)登记数据(2004-2013 年)中确定了 RSA 治疗 CTA 或骨关节炎的患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析计算生存率。使用 Cox 多变量回归分析计算调整了性别、关节置换品牌、年龄(<70 岁)和手术年份后的翻修率。

结果

研究纳入了 1904 例 RSA 患者(1904 例 RSA)(69%为女性;平均年龄为 74 岁;年龄范围为 35-97 岁)。95 例(5%)患者进行了翻修,10 年累积翻修率为 0.91。最常见的翻修原因是感染(n=42),其次是松动(n=16)和不稳定(n=12)。大多数翻修发生在初次手术后 6 个月内。与女性相比,男性翻修风险显著增加(风险比,3.8;95%置信区间,2.4-6.1)。最常见的植入物是 Delta Xtend(n=1366)和 Delta Mark III(n=246)。与 Delta Xtend 相比,Delta Mark III 的翻修风险为 2.1(95%置信区间,1.1-4.3)。年龄和手术年份与翻修风险无统计学显著相关性。

结论

对于 CTA,RSA 中期翻修的总体风险较低(5%)。早期翻修最常见的原因是感染。男性与翻修风险显著增加相关。

相似文献

1
Risk and risk factors for revision after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis: a Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association study.原发性反肩关节置换术后修复肩袖撕裂性关节炎和骨关节炎的风险和风险因素:北欧关节置换登记协会研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1596-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.060. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
What Factors are Associated with Revision or Worse Patient-reported Outcome after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Cuff-tear Arthropathy? A Study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.哪些因素与肩袖撕裂性关节病行反肩关节置换术后的翻修或更差的患者报告结局相关?来自丹麦肩关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 May;478(5):1089-1097. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001114.
3
The Delta III and Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty-risk of revision and failure mechanisms: a report on 3650 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2021.Delta III和Delta Xtend反向肩关节置换术——翻修风险及失败机制:来自挪威关节置换登记处1994年至2021年3650例病例的报告
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Mar;33(3):666-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Previous rotator cuff repair increases the risk of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.既往的肩袖修复术会增加翻修手术治疗反肩关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jan;32(1):111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
5
Poor patient-reported outcome after shoulder replacement in young patients with cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.肩袖撕裂性骨关节炎年轻患者行肩关节置换术后较差的患者报告结局:来自丹麦肩关节置换登记处的配对分析。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):119-122. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1563855. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy.针对骨关节炎和肩袖撕裂性关节病的肩关节置换手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD012879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012879.pub2.
7
Does the etiology of a failed hemiarthroplasty affect outcomes when revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty?半髋关节成形术失败的病因是否会影响翻修为反式肩关节成形术的结果?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S149-S156. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Lower operating volume in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with increased revision rates in the early postoperative period: long-term analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.肩关节置换手术的手术量较低与术后早期翻修率增加相关:来自澳大利亚矫形协会国家关节置换登记处的长期分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1104-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.026. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
Similar rates of revision surgery following primary anatomic compared with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 70 years or older with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a cohort study of 3791 patients.70 岁及以上肩关节炎患者中初次解剖型与反式肩关节置换术后翻修手术率相似:3791 例患者的队列研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):1893-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.021. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.用于治疗巨大不可修复性肩袖撕裂和肩袖撕裂性关节病的反式肩关节置换术:一项系统评价
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Aug;101(2):105-112. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.更正:肩峰III型骨折中单钢板与双钢板接骨术的生物力学比较
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Jun 28;17:138220. doi: 10.52965/001c.138220. eCollection 2025.
2
Early complications and risk factors following reverse versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a nationwide registry study.骨关节炎患者行反式与解剖型全肩关节置换术后的早期并发症及危险因素:一项全国性登记研究
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025 Jun;28(2):146-155. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00906. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Long-term outcomes of Grammont style reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum of 10-year follow-up: A survival analysis.
Grammont式反肩关节置换术至少10年随访的长期结果:一项生存分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Apr 18:17585732251331474. doi: 10.1177/17585732251331474.
4
Shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly.老年人的肩关节置换术
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 19;65:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102976. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
A comparative analysis of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid wear patterns.解剖型全肩关节置换术与反式肩关节置换术治疗肩胛盂后方磨损模式的对比分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Dec 14;61:102868. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102868. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Risk factors for infection after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty - A systematic review with meta-analysis.初次反式肩关节置换术后感染的危险因素——一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 22;60:102833. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102833. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Influence of design features and brand of reverse shoulder arthroplasties on survivorship and reasons for revision surgery: results of 5,494 arthroplasties with up to 15 years' follow-up reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2007-2022.反向肩关节置换术的设计特点和品牌对生存率和翻修手术原因的影响:2007-2022 年向挪威关节置换登记处报告的 5494 例关节置换术随访时间长达 15 年的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Aug 27;95:463-471. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41344.
8
Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.肩峰III型骨折单钢板与双钢板接骨术的生物力学比较
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Apr 26;16:88396. doi: 10.52965/001c.88396. eCollection 2024.
9
Midterm outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up.初次反肩关节置换术的中期疗效:对至少随访5年的研究的系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Oct 3;4(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.003. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Primary inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher rate of revision than onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.初次嵌体式反肩关节置换术的翻修率高于覆盖式反肩关节置换术:来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Nov;15(3 Suppl):75-81. doi: 10.1177/17585732221122275. Epub 2022 Aug 24.