Suppr超能文献

原发性反肩关节置换术后修复肩袖撕裂性关节炎和骨关节炎的风险和风险因素:北欧关节置换登记协会研究。

Risk and risk factors for revision after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis: a Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1596-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.060. Epub 2018 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has gained increasing popularity in the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of RSA and the risk factors for revision following RSA.

METHODS

RSA patients with CTA or osteoarthritis were identified from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association registry data (2004-2013). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate survival probabilities. Cox multiple regression analysis was used to calculate revision rates adjusted for sex, arthroplasty brand, age (<70 years), and year of surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 1904 patients with RSA (1904 RSAs) (69% women; mean age, 74 years; age range, 35-97 years). Revision was performed in 95 patients (5%), with a 10-year cumulative revision rate of 0.91. The most common reason for revision was infection (n = 42), followed by loosening (n = 16) and instability (n = 12). Most revisions occurred less than 6 months after the primary operation. Men had a significantly increased risk of revision compared with women (risk ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-6.1). The most common implants were the Delta Xtend (n = 1366) and Delta Mark III (n = 246). The risk of revision of the Delta Mark III was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.3) compared with the Delta Xtend. Age and year of surgery were not statistically significantly associated with risk of revision.

CONCLUSION

The overall midterm risk of revision after RSA for CTA was low (5%). The most common reason for early revision was infection. Male sex was associated with a significantly increased risk of revision.

摘要

背景

反向肩关节置换术(RSA)在治疗肩袖撕裂性关节炎(CTA)方面越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在评估 RSA 的生存率以及 RSA 后翻修的风险因素。

方法

从北欧关节置换注册协会(NARA)登记数据(2004-2013 年)中确定了 RSA 治疗 CTA 或骨关节炎的患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析计算生存率。使用 Cox 多变量回归分析计算调整了性别、关节置换品牌、年龄(<70 岁)和手术年份后的翻修率。

结果

研究纳入了 1904 例 RSA 患者(1904 例 RSA)(69%为女性;平均年龄为 74 岁;年龄范围为 35-97 岁)。95 例(5%)患者进行了翻修,10 年累积翻修率为 0.91。最常见的翻修原因是感染(n=42),其次是松动(n=16)和不稳定(n=12)。大多数翻修发生在初次手术后 6 个月内。与女性相比,男性翻修风险显著增加(风险比,3.8;95%置信区间,2.4-6.1)。最常见的植入物是 Delta Xtend(n=1366)和 Delta Mark III(n=246)。与 Delta Xtend 相比,Delta Mark III 的翻修风险为 2.1(95%置信区间,1.1-4.3)。年龄和手术年份与翻修风险无统计学显著相关性。

结论

对于 CTA,RSA 中期翻修的总体风险较低(5%)。早期翻修最常见的原因是感染。男性与翻修风险显著增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验