Suppr超能文献

南非某公共区域牛群接种布鲁氏菌流产菌株19后的免疫反应

Immunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa.

作者信息

Simpson Gregory J G, Marcotty Tanguy, Rouille Elodie, Chilundo Abel, Letteson Jean-Jacques, Godfroid Jacques

机构信息

Department of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria.

出版信息

J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2018 Mar 29;89(0):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527.

Abstract

Brucellosis is of worldwide economic and public health importance. Heifer vaccination with live attenuated Brucella abortus strain 19 (S19) is the cornerstone of control in low- and middle-income countries. Antibody persistence induced by S19 is directly correlated with the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per dose. There are two vaccination methods: a 'high' dose (5-8 × 1010 CFU) subcutaneously injected or one or two 'low' doses (5 × 109 CFU) through the conjunctival route. This study aimed to evaluate serological reactions to the 'high' dose and possible implications of the serological findings on disease control. This study included 58 female cases, vaccinated at Day 0, and 29 male controls. Serum was drawn repeatedly and tested for Brucella antibodies using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The cases showed a rapid antibody response with peak RBT positivity (98%) at 2 weeks and iELISA (95%) at 8 weeks, then decreased in an inverse logistic curve to 14% RBT and 32% iELISA positive at 59 weeks and at 4.5 years 57% (4/7 cases) demonstrated a persistent immune response (RBT, iELISA or Brucellin skin test) to Brucella spp. Our study is the first of its kind documenting the persistence of antibodies in an African communal farming setting for over a year to years after 'high' dose S19 vaccination, which can be difficult to differentiate from a response to infection with wild-type B. abortus. A recommendation could be using a 'low' dose or different route of vaccination.

摘要

布鲁氏菌病在全球范围内具有重要的经济和公共卫生意义。用减毒活疫苗布鲁氏菌流产菌株19(S19)给小母牛接种是中低收入国家控制该病的基石。S19诱导的抗体持久性与每剂的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量直接相关。有两种接种方法:皮下注射“高”剂量(5 - 8×10¹⁰CFU),或通过结膜途径接种一或两剂“低”剂量(5×10⁹CFU)。本研究旨在评估对“高”剂量的血清学反应以及血清学结果对疾病控制的可能影响。本研究纳入了58例在第0天接种疫苗的雌性病例和29例雄性对照。反复采集血清,使用玫瑰红试验(RBT)和间接酶联免疫吸附测定(iELISA)检测布鲁氏菌抗体。病例显示出快速的抗体反应,RBT阳性率在2周时达到峰值(98%),iELISA在8周时达到峰值(95%),然后呈反向逻辑曲线下降,在59周时RBT阳性率降至14%,iELISA阳性率降至32%,在4.5岁时,57%(4/7例)对布鲁氏菌属表现出持续的免疫反应(RBT、iELISA或布鲁氏菌素皮肤试验)。我们的研究首次记录了在非洲社区养殖环境中,“高”剂量S19疫苗接种后一年多至数年抗体的持久性,这可能难以与对野生型流产布鲁氏菌感染的反应区分开来。建议可以使用“低”剂量或不同的接种途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c486/6138165/412421775f48/JSAVA-89-1527-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Immunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa.
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2018 Mar 29;89(0):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527.
5
Comparative analysis of immune responses in cattle vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain 19 or strain RB51.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1995 Feb;44(3-4):223-35. doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(94)05311-f.
9
Efficacy of strain RB51 vaccine in heifers against experimental brucellosis.
Vaccine. 2006 Jun 19;24(25):5327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.020. Epub 2006 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Brucellosis: Unveiling the complexities of a pervasive zoonotic disease and its global impacts.
Open Vet J. 2024 May;14(5):1081-1097. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i5.1. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Polyphasic Characterization of spp. in Livestock Slaughtered from Abattoirs in Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 22;12(1):223. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010223.
4
Seroprevalence of brucellosis in communal and smallholder cattle farming in North West Province, South Africa.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2023 Dec 26;90(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v90i1.2114.
6
Brucellosis in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland: threat to animal production and wildlife conservation.
Braz J Microbiol. 2022 Dec;53(4):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s42770-022-00831-0. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of Isolates from Various Regions of South Africa.
Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 11;9(3):570. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030570.
9
Immune Response to Mucosal Infection.
Front Immunol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1759. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01759. eCollection 2019.
10
Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa.
Vet Med Sci. 2019 Nov;5(4):545-555. doi: 10.1002/vms3.190. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Documenting the absence of brucellosis in cattle, goats and dogs in a "One Health" interface in the Mnisi community, Limpopo, South Africa.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Apr;50(4):903-906. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1495-1. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
2
One Health profile of a community at the wildlife-domestic animal interface, Mpumalanga, South Africa.
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Aug 1;130:119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 9;10(9):e0136696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136696. eCollection 2015.
4
Immune response triggered by Brucella abortus following infection or vaccination.
Vaccine. 2015 Jul 17;33(31):3659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.057. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years.
Vet Pathol. 2014 Nov;51(6):1076-89. doi: 10.1177/0300985814540545. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century.
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Nov 1;102(2):118-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 14.
7
Field trial of six serological tests for bovine brucellosis.
Vet J. 2012 Mar;191(3):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 May 6.
8
Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife.
Croat Med J. 2010 Aug;51(4):296-305. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.296.
9
Brucellosis: past, present and future.
Prilozi. 2010;31(1):21-32.
10
Bovine brucellosis.
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2010 Mar;26(1):15-27, table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.10.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验