Hwang Jin Ho, Park Sang Woo, Chang Il Soo, Kim Ki Hyun, Kang Ji Hun
*All authors are affiliated with the Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
All authors are affiliated with the Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Oct;44(10):1287-1294. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001543.
Redo surgery for recurrent varicose veins of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is technically more challenging than the initial surgery.
To compare 980 and 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of residual GSV insufficiency after saphenofemoral ligation ± stripping.
Thirty-seven limbs in 29 patients with recurrent varicose veins were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 980-nm EVLA (group A), 1,470-nm EVLA (group B), and RFA (group C). Duplex ultrasonography, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and adverse events were examined at intervals of 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Complete closure was achieved in 35 (94.6%) limbs at 12 months. Venous Clinical Severity Score decrease in group C (3.6 ± 0.5) was significantly (p < .017) greater compared with that of group A (2.6 ± 0.9). Ecchymosis grade was significantly (p < .017) lower in group C (0.1 ± 0.3) than that in group A (1.6 ± 1.5).
Endovenous thermal ablation using EVLA or RFA is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent varicose veins resulting from residual GSV insufficiency after saphenous venous surgery. The RFA is superior to 980-nm EVLA in terms of postprocedural ecchymosis and improvement in VCSS.
大隐静脉(GSV)复发性静脉曲张的再次手术在技术上比初次手术更具挑战性。
比较980纳米和1470纳米的腔内激光消融术(EVLA)以及射频消融术(RFA)治疗隐股结扎术±剥脱术后残留的GSV功能不全。
对29例复发性静脉曲张患者的37条肢体进行回顾性评估。患者分为3组:980纳米EVLA组(A组)、1470纳米EVLA组(B组)和RFA组(C组)。在术后1周、1、3、6和12个月时,通过双功超声、静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)以及不良事件进行检查。
12个月时,35条(94.6%)肢体实现完全闭合。与A组(2.6±0.9)相比,C组的静脉临床严重程度评分降低幅度(3.6±0.5)显著更大(p<.017)。C组的瘀斑分级(0.1±0.3)显著低于A组(1.6±1.5)(p<.017)。
使用EVLA或RFA进行腔内热消融术治疗大隐静脉手术后残留GSV功能不全导致的复发性静脉曲张是安全有效的。在术后瘀斑和VCSS改善方面,RFA优于980纳米的EVLA。