Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Sep;8(9):1028-1033. doi: 10.1002/alr.22147. Epub 2018 May 21.
Acute exacerbations in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are often treated with courses of systemic antibiotics. Poor correlation between microbiologic culture results and the sinus microbiome in CRS has caused increased debate as to the relevance of culture-directed antibiotics. There is currently sparse data comparing outcomes of culture-directed antibiotics vs non-culture-directed antibiotics for treatment of CRS.
This work reports a retrospective review. A total of 946 CRS patients treated with antibiotics were examined; 122 CRS patients with acute exacerbations were treated with culture-directed (n = 61) vs empiric (n = 61) antibiotics. Lund-Kennedy (LK) and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores were compared pretreatment and posttreatment, with short-term (<1 month) and long-term (1-6 months) follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and prior surgical history were collected.
Both groups had similar pretreatment SNOT-22 scores (p = 0.25) while the culture group had higher baseline LK endoscopy scores (p < 0.01). All data were adjusted for pertinent comorbidities, surgical history, co-therapeutics, and baseline scores. There was no difference in improvement in culture-directed and empirically treated groups in the short-term (p = 0.77) and long-term (p = 0.58) for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of SNOT-22 and no difference in the short-term for LK scores (p = 0.11), but there was significantly more improvement in long-term LK scores in the culture-directed group (p = 0.01).
Culture-directed therapy improves long-term endoscopy scores but does not yield an advantage in improving short-term endoscopy scores, nor in improving short-term and long-term quality of life scores in CRS patients. A prospective study is necessary to examine the relevance of routine microbiologic cultures in CRS patients.
慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者的急性加重通常采用全身抗生素疗程进行治疗。CRS 患者的微生物培养结果与窦内微生物组之间相关性较差,这引发了关于培养指导抗生素相关性的更多争论。目前,比较培养指导抗生素与非培养指导抗生素治疗 CRS 结果的数据很少。
本研究报告了一项回顾性研究。共检查了 946 例接受抗生素治疗的 CRS 患者;122 例 CRS 急性加重患者接受了培养指导(n=61)与经验性(n=61)抗生素治疗。在治疗前和治疗后比较了 Lund-Kennedy(LK)和 22 项鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)评分,并进行了短期(<1 个月)和长期(1-6 个月)随访。收集了患者的人口统计学、合并症和既往手术史。
两组患者治疗前的 SNOT-22 评分相似(p=0.25),而培养组的基线 LK 内镜评分更高(p<0.01)。所有数据均根据相关合并症、手术史、合并治疗和基线评分进行了调整。在短期(p=0.77)和长期(p=0.58)时,培养指导和经验性治疗组的 SNOT-22 最小临床重要差异(MCID)改善无差异,短期 LK 评分也无差异(p=0.11),但培养指导组的长期 LK 评分改善更显著(p=0.01)。
培养指导治疗可改善长期内镜评分,但在改善短期内镜评分以及 CRS 患者短期和长期生活质量评分方面没有优势。需要前瞻性研究来检验 CRS 患者常规微生物培养的相关性。