Yin Qudong, Gu Sanjun, Wang Jianbing, Li Haifeng
Department of Orthopedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital, Hand Surgery Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi Jiangsu, 214062, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 8;30(8):951-955. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160193.
To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and hollow compression screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures.
Between January 2010 and June 2014, 70 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups. After reduction, fracture was fixed with PCCP in 35 cases (group A) and with hollow compression screw in 35 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, cause, side and type of fractures, time from injury to operation, associated disease, pre-operative Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (>0.05). The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, fracture healing time, fracture reduction quality, time of rehabilitation and weightloading; complication, post-operative Harris score and post-operative VAS score were compared between 2 groups.
The incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 13-34 months (mean, 23.7 months). There were significant differences in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and fracture healing time between 2 groups (<0.05). There was no significant in the fracture reduction quality between 2 groups (>0.05). Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 2 cases of group A after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade IV); and avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 4 cases of group B after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade I in 2 cases, grade Ⅱ in 1 case, grade Ⅲ in 1 case, and grade IV in 1 case), nonunion in 1 case, and screw loosening in 3 cases; and there was significant difference in the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head between 2 groups (=-3.997, =0.046). Difference was significant in fracture reduction quality in the patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head and nonunion between 2 groups (=1.991, =0.047). The time of rehabilitation and weight-loading of group A was significantly earlier than that of group B (<0.05); the Harris and VAS scores of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 12 months after operation (<0.05).
PCCP for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures has better static stability and better sliding dynamic pressure effect than hollow compression screw, and it can provide earlier rehabilitation and weight-loading postoperatively and obviously decrease the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, but avascular necrosis of the femoral head still occur in patients with poor reduction or comminuted fracture.
比较经皮加压钢板(PCCP)与空心加压螺钉治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效。
2010年1月至2014年6月,将70例移位型股骨颈骨折患者随机分为2组。复位后,35例采用PCCP固定(A组),35例采用空心加压螺钉固定(B组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、病因、骨折侧别及类型、受伤至手术时间、合并疾病、术前Harris评分及视觉模拟评分(VAS)等方面差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、骨折复位质量、康复及负重时间;并发症、术后Harris评分及术后VAS评分。
切口均一期愈合。所有患者均获随访,随访时间13~34个月,平均23.7个月。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量及骨折愈合时间比较,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两组骨折复位质量比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。A组术后发生股骨头缺血坏死2例(骨折复位质量:Ⅳ级);B组术后发生股骨头缺血坏死4例(骨折复位质量:Ⅰ级2例,Ⅱ级1例,Ⅲ级1例,Ⅳ级1例),骨不连1例,螺钉松动3例;两组骨不连及股骨头缺血坏死发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(=-3.997,=0.046)。两组股骨头缺血坏死及骨不连患者骨折复位质量比较,差异有统计学意义(=1.991,=0.047)。A组康复及负重时间明显早于B组(<0.05);术后12个月A组Harris及VAS评分明显优于B组(<0.05)。
PCCP治疗移位型股骨颈骨折较空心加压螺钉具有更好的静态稳定性和滑动动力加压效果,可使患者术后更早康复及负重,明显降低骨不连及股骨头缺血坏死的发生率,但复位不佳或粉碎性骨折患者仍可发生股骨头缺血坏死。