Suppr超能文献

[使用不同重建方法对第一腕掌关节稳定性的生物力学评估]

[Biomechanical evaluation of the first carpometacarpal joint stability by using different reconstruction methods].

作者信息

He Shukun, Xu Long, Zhao Sichun, Huang Fuguo

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China.

.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 15;31(2):171-175. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201610035.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the biomechanical differences of the first carpometacarpal joint stability by using different reconstruction methods so as to provide theoretical basis for the clinical choice of reconstruction method.

METHODS

The upper limb specimens were selected from 12 fresh adult cadavers, which had no fracture, bone disease, dislocation of wrist joint, deformity, degeneration, or ligament injury on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups: normal group, injury group, palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, and palmar and dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group. Three normal specimens were used as normal group, and then were made of the first carpometacarpal joint dislocation models (injury group); after the first carpometacarpal joint dislocation was established in the other 9 specimens; the volar ligament, dorsal ligament, and volar-dorsal ligaments were reconstructed with Eaton-Little method, Yin Weitian method, and the above two methods in 3 construction groups. The biomechanical test was done to obtain the load-displacement curve and to calculate the elastic modulus.

RESULTS

During biomechanical test, ligament rupture and loosening of Kirschner wire occurred in 1 case of injury group and palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group; no slipping was observed. The elastic modulus values were (11.61±0.20), (5.39±0.12), (6.33±0.10), (7.12±0.08), and (8.30±0.10) MPa in normal group, injury group, palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, and palmar and dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group respectively, showing significant differences among groups ( <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Volar ligament reconstruction, dorsal ligament reconstruction, and volar-dorsal ligament reconstruction all can greatly improve the stability of the first carpometacarpal joint. And the effect of volar-dorsal ligament reconstruction is the best, but the stability can not restore to normal.

摘要

目的

通过采用不同重建方法研究第一掌腕关节稳定性的生物力学差异,为临床重建方法的选择提供理论依据。

方法

选取12具新鲜成人尸体的上肢标本,其正侧位X线片无骨折、骨病、腕关节脱位、畸形、退变或韧带损伤。标本随机分为5组:正常组、损伤组、掌侧掌腕韧带重建组、背侧掌腕韧带重建组、掌背侧掌腕韧带重建组。取3个正常标本作为正常组,然后制作第一掌腕关节脱位模型(损伤组);在另外9个标本建立第一掌腕关节脱位后,3个构建组分别采用伊顿-利特尔法、尹为天法及上述两种方法重建掌侧韧带、背侧韧带及掌背侧韧带。进行生物力学测试以获得载荷-位移曲线并计算弹性模量。

结果

生物力学测试过程中,损伤组和掌侧掌腕韧带重建组各有1例出现韧带断裂及克氏针松动,未见滑脱现象。正常组、损伤组、掌侧掌腕韧带重建组、背侧掌腕韧带重建组、掌背侧掌腕韧带重建组的弹性模量值分别为(11.61±0.20)、(5.39±0.12)、(6.33±0.10)、(7.12±0.08)、(8.30±0.10)MPa,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

掌侧韧带重建、背侧韧带重建及掌背侧韧带重建均能显著提高第一掌腕关节稳定性。且掌背侧韧带重建效果最佳,但稳定性不能恢复至正常。

相似文献

8
First Carpometacarpal Joint Instability: Dorsal Ligament Reconstruction.第一腕掌关节不稳定:背侧韧带重建。
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2020 Nov 20;25(3):169-174. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000327.

本文引用的文献

8
A congenital dislocation of the trapeziometacarpal joint.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Feb;36(2):160-1. doi: 10.1177/1753193410387546.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验