He Shukun, Xu Long, Zhao Sichun, Huang Fuguo
Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China.
.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 15;31(2):171-175. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201610035.
To study the biomechanical differences of the first carpometacarpal joint stability by using different reconstruction methods so as to provide theoretical basis for the clinical choice of reconstruction method.
The upper limb specimens were selected from 12 fresh adult cadavers, which had no fracture, bone disease, dislocation of wrist joint, deformity, degeneration, or ligament injury on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups: normal group, injury group, palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, and palmar and dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group. Three normal specimens were used as normal group, and then were made of the first carpometacarpal joint dislocation models (injury group); after the first carpometacarpal joint dislocation was established in the other 9 specimens; the volar ligament, dorsal ligament, and volar-dorsal ligaments were reconstructed with Eaton-Little method, Yin Weitian method, and the above two methods in 3 construction groups. The biomechanical test was done to obtain the load-displacement curve and to calculate the elastic modulus.
During biomechanical test, ligament rupture and loosening of Kirschner wire occurred in 1 case of injury group and palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group; no slipping was observed. The elastic modulus values were (11.61±0.20), (5.39±0.12), (6.33±0.10), (7.12±0.08), and (8.30±0.10) MPa in normal group, injury group, palmar carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group, and palmar and dorsal carpometacarpal ligaments reconstruction group respectively, showing significant differences among groups ( <0.05).
Volar ligament reconstruction, dorsal ligament reconstruction, and volar-dorsal ligament reconstruction all can greatly improve the stability of the first carpometacarpal joint. And the effect of volar-dorsal ligament reconstruction is the best, but the stability can not restore to normal.
通过采用不同重建方法研究第一掌腕关节稳定性的生物力学差异,为临床重建方法的选择提供理论依据。
选取12具新鲜成人尸体的上肢标本,其正侧位X线片无骨折、骨病、腕关节脱位、畸形、退变或韧带损伤。标本随机分为5组:正常组、损伤组、掌侧掌腕韧带重建组、背侧掌腕韧带重建组、掌背侧掌腕韧带重建组。取3个正常标本作为正常组,然后制作第一掌腕关节脱位模型(损伤组);在另外9个标本建立第一掌腕关节脱位后,3个构建组分别采用伊顿-利特尔法、尹为天法及上述两种方法重建掌侧韧带、背侧韧带及掌背侧韧带。进行生物力学测试以获得载荷-位移曲线并计算弹性模量。
生物力学测试过程中,损伤组和掌侧掌腕韧带重建组各有1例出现韧带断裂及克氏针松动,未见滑脱现象。正常组、损伤组、掌侧掌腕韧带重建组、背侧掌腕韧带重建组、掌背侧掌腕韧带重建组的弹性模量值分别为(11.61±0.20)、(5.39±0.12)、(6.33±0.10)、(7.12±0.08)、(8.30±0.10)MPa,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。
掌侧韧带重建、背侧韧带重建及掌背侧韧带重建均能显著提高第一掌腕关节稳定性。且掌背侧韧带重建效果最佳,但稳定性不能恢复至正常。