Kong Xiangpeng, Wang Yan, Chai Wei, Ni Ming, Li Xiang
Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 8;30(12):1467-1471. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160304.
To compare the effectiveness between histoacryl topical skin adhesive and traditional method for wound closure in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
A total of 159 patients undergoing THA were divided into 2 groups between January and October in 2015. Subcuticular suture and histoacryl topical skin adhesive (cyanoacrylate adhesive) were used in 80 patients (100 hips) (test group), and traditional method (skin staples and wound drainage) was used in 79 patients (100 hips) (control group) for wound closure. There was no significant difference (>0.05) in gender, age, body mass index, and etiology between 2 groups. The operation time, length of stay, incision pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and healing of incision, and incision satisfaction evaluation, and classification were compared between 2 groups.
All patients were followed up 3-6 months (mean. 4.7 months). There was no significant difference in operation time between 2 groups (=-0.527, =0.598); but the length of stay of test group was less than that of control group (=-2.004, =0.045). Incision exudation and dehiscence occurred in 1 case (1 hip) and 1 case (1 hip) of test group respectively; incision swollen, persistent wound exudation, exudation, and sutured drainage tube occurred in 2 cases (2 hips), 2 cases (2 hips), 4 cases (4 hips), and 1 case (1 hip) of control group. No statistically significant difference was found in VAS score between 2 groups at 15 days after operation (=-0.125, =0.901), but wound healing score of test group was significantly higher than that of control group (=-2.943, =0.003). Wound healing was class A in 98 hips and class B in 2 hips in test group, and was class A in 92 hips and class B in 8 hips in control group, and difference was statistically significant (=3.789, =0.048). The incision satisfaction of test group was significantly higher than that of control group (=-2.626, =0.009).
Compared with traditional method, histoacryl topical skin adhesive has decreased wound complication rate, and it is an easy and safe method with high satisfaction.
比较组织黏合剂局部皮肤黏合与传统方法在全髋关节置换术(THA)中伤口闭合的效果。
2015年1月至10月,共159例行THA的患者被分为2组。80例患者(100髋)(试验组)采用皮下缝合和组织黏合剂局部皮肤黏合(氰基丙烯酸酯黏合剂),79例患者(100髋)(对照组)采用传统方法(皮肤钉合和伤口引流)进行伤口闭合。两组在性别、年龄、体重指数和病因方面无显著差异(>0.05)。比较两组的手术时间、住院时间、切口疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、切口愈合情况、切口满意度评价及分类。
所有患者均随访3 - 6个月(平均4.7个月)。两组手术时间无显著差异(=-0.527,=0.598);但试验组住院时间短于对照组(=-2.004,=0.045)。试验组分别有1例(1髋)发生切口渗液和1例(1髋)发生切口裂开;对照组有2例(2髋)发生切口肿胀、2例(2髋)发生持续伤口渗液、4例(4髋)发生渗液及1例(1髋)发生缝合引流管情况。术后15天两组VAS评分无统计学显著差异(=-0.125,=0.901),但试验组伤口愈合评分显著高于对照组(=-2.943,=0.003)。试验组98髋伤口愈合为A类,2髋为B类;对照组92髋为A类,8髋为B类,差异有统计学意义(=3.789,=0.048)。试验组切口满意度显著高于对照组(=-2.626,=0.009)。
与传统方法相比,组织黏合剂局部皮肤黏合降低了伤口并发症发生率,是一种简单、安全且满意度高的方法。