Suppr超能文献

[经皮骶髂关节螺钉内固定治疗骨盆后环损伤的ISO-C导航]

[ISO-C NAVIGATION FOR PERCUTANEOUS SACROILIAC JOINT SCREW INTERNAL FIXATION FOR TREATMENT OF PELVIC POSTERIOR RING INJURIES].

作者信息

Wang Xiaozhen, Wang Guodong, Meng Chengfei, Liu Ximing, Cai Xianhua

机构信息

Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Wuhan Hubei, 430070, P.R.China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 8;30(11):1338-1343. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160274.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the advantages and effectiveness of ISO-C guided percutaneous sacroiliac joint screw internal fixation for treatment of pelvic posterior ring injuries by comparing with anterior opened reduction and reconstruction plate internal fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 54 patients with posterior ring injury treated between June 2013 and January 2016. Of 54 patients, 33 underwent ISO-C guided percutaneous sacroiliac joint screws internal fixation (group A), and 21 underwent anterior opened reduction and reconstruction plate internal fixation (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injuries, injury to operation time, fractures type, combined injuries, and injury severity score (ISS) between 2 groups (>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of operative incision, hospitalization time, postoperative pain degree, reduction evaluation, and functional evaluation were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

Group A was significantly better than group B in operation time, length of operative incision, and hospitalization time (<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss of group A (10-20 mL) was significantly less than that of group B[(524.1±160.1) mL]. All patients of the 2 groups were followed up 7 to 24 months with an average of 11.6 months. No injury of vessel or nerve occurred in group A; worse neurological symptoms of lower limbs and incision infection were observed in 2 patients of group B respectively, and the other patients achieved primary healing of incision. At 48 hours after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of group A (1.7±0.7) was significantly lower than that of group B (8.2±0.8) (=-30.463, =0.000). Radiological examination showed fracture reduction. According to the Matta score standard, the reduction results were excellent in 21 cases (63.6%), good in 10 cases (30.3%), and fair in 2 cases (6.1%) in group A; the reduction results were excellent in 16 cases (76.2%), good in 4 cases (19.1%), and fair in 1 case (4.7%) in group B; and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (=0.961, =0.618). Fracture or dislocation healed well in 2 groups, and the walking function was restored. According to the Majeed standard for evaluation, the results were excellent in 23 cases (69.7%), good in 9 cases (27.3%), and fair in 1 case (3.0%) in group A; the results were excellent in 14 cases (66.7%), good in 5 cases (23.8%), and fair in 2 cases (9.5%) in group B; no significant difference was shown between 2 groups (=1.501, =0.591).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with anterior opened reduction and reconstruction plate internal fixation, ISO-C navigation percutaneous sacroiliac joint screw internal fixation is an ideal surgical method to treat pelvic posterior ring injury, with the characteristics of less trauma, less pain, precise screw implant and safety.

摘要

目的

通过与前路切开复位重建钢板内固定术比较,探讨ISO-C引导下经皮骶髂关节螺钉内固定术治疗骨盆后环损伤的优势及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年6月至2016年1月收治的54例骨盆后环损伤患者的临床资料。54例患者中,33例行ISO-C引导下经皮骶髂关节螺钉内固定术(A组),21例行前路切开复位重建钢板内固定术(B组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、受伤原因、受伤至手术时间、骨折类型、合并伤及损伤严重程度评分(ISS)等方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、住院时间、术后疼痛程度、复位情况及功能评价。

结果

A组患者在手术时间、手术切口长度及住院时间方面均显著优于B组(<0.05)。A组术中出血量为(10~20)ml,显著少于B组[(524.1±160.1)ml]。两组患者均获随访,随访时间7~24个月,平均11.6个月。A组无血管神经损伤发生;B组2例出现下肢神经症状加重,1例切口感染,其余患者切口均一期愈合。术后48小时,A组视觉模拟评分(VAS)为(1.7±0.7)分,显著低于B组(8.2±0.8)分(=-30.463,=0.000)。影像学检查显示骨折复位。按Matta评分标准,A组复位结果优21例(63.6%),良10例(30.3%),可2例(6.1%);B组复位结果优16例(76.2%),良4例(19.1%),可1例(4.7%);两组比较差异无统计学意义(=0.961,=0.618)。两组骨折或脱位均愈合良好,行走功能恢复。按Majeed标准评价,A组结果优23例(69.7%),良9例(27.3%),可1例(3.0%);B组结果优14例(66.7%),良5例(23.8%),可2例(9.5%);两组比较差异无统计学意义(=1.501,=0.591)。

结论

与前路切开复位重建钢板内固定术比较,ISO-C导航下经皮骶髂关节螺钉内固定术治疗骨盆后环损伤具有创伤小、疼痛轻、螺钉植入精确、安全等优点,是一种理想的手术方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验