• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将种植体周围组织评分(PITS)作为成功的衡量标准,应用于一项回顾性临床研究中的869颗牙种植体。

Peri-implant tissue score (PITS) as a measure of success, applied to 869 dental implants from a retrospective clinical study.

作者信息

Mazur Zbyněk, Korábek Ladislav, Mazur Daniel

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2018;49(7):567-579. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40470.

DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a40470
PMID:29786704
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article presents a methodology of a comprehensive score for assessment and monitoring of dental implant success from the peri-implant tissue perspective. It involves only standard and minimally invasive techniques accessible to general dental practices, without the need for special equipment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The proposed score methodology combines existing consensual global knowledge regarding aspects of dental implant success with the standard examination tools accepted for regular recall assessment. The score is a sum of five three-grade parameters: bone level, peri-implant inflammation, amount of attached mucosa, tissues recession (ie, exposure of implant components to intraoral environment), and the horizontal buccal profile of the alveolar process. The name peri-implant tissue score (PITS) is derived from the intended primary use of monitoring the state of implants and the surrounding hard and soft tissues. With its emphasis on buccal-aspect tissues, the score is designed to aid the detection of early signs of tissues deterioration.

RESULTS

The use of the score is demonstrated on a sample pool of 869 retrospectively evaluated implants with airborne-particle-abraded, acid-etched surfaces with time in service from 0 to 12 years. The parameters constituting the score were statistically tested on correlation with a reference set of success criteria, on mutual cross-correlations, and on the invariance to the implants' time-in-service. The PITS demonstrated to be highly representative of the success criteria, offering a fine scale from 0 to 10, and reversibility.

CONCLUSION

The PITS withstood the tests. It responds to an existing need in the field, is widely accessible and inexpensive, and, thus, shows promise for use in general dental practice.

摘要

目的

本文从种植体周围组织角度介绍一种用于评估和监测牙种植体成功的综合评分方法。该方法仅涉及一般牙科诊所可采用的标准且微创的技术,无需特殊设备。

方法和材料

所提出的评分方法将关于牙种植体成功方面的现有共识性整体知识与常规复诊评估所接受的标准检查工具相结合。该评分是五个三级参数的总和:骨水平、种植体周围炎症、附着黏膜量、组织退缩(即种植体部件暴露于口腔内环境)以及牙槽突的水平颊侧外形。种植体周围组织评分(PITS)这一名称源于其监测种植体及周围软硬组织状态的主要用途。由于该评分强调颊侧组织,旨在有助于检测组织恶化的早期迹象。

结果

在一个包含869颗种植体的样本库中展示了该评分的应用,这些种植体为经空气颗粒喷砂、酸蚀处理的表面,使用时间从0至12年不等,对这些种植体进行了回顾性评估。对构成该评分的参数与一组成功标准参考值的相关性、相互间的交叉相关性以及种植体使用时间的不变性进行了统计学测试。PITS被证明高度代表成功标准,提供了从0到10的精细评分范围以及可逆性。

结论

PITS通过了各项测试。它满足了该领域的现有需求,易于获取且成本低廉,因此在一般牙科实践中显示出应用前景。

相似文献

1
Peri-implant tissue score (PITS) as a measure of success, applied to 869 dental implants from a retrospective clinical study.将种植体周围组织评分(PITS)作为成功的衡量标准,应用于一项回顾性临床研究中的869颗牙种植体。
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(7):567-579. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40470.
2
Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability in Implants Placed Simultaneously Versus Delayed with Intraoral Block Bone Grafts in Horizontal Defects: A Retrospective Case Series Study.水平骨缺损中同期植入与延迟植入口腔内块状骨移植种植体周围软硬组织稳定性:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):133-41. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4026.
3
Peri-implant Tissues and Patient Satisfaction After Treatment of Vertically Augmented Atrophic Posterior Mandibles with Intraoral Onlay Block Bone Grafts: A Retrospective 3-Year Case Series Follow-up Study.采用口内嵌体块状骨移植治疗垂直性骨增量萎缩后下颌骨后的种植体周围组织及患者满意度:一项为期3年的回顾性病例系列随访研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):137-144. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4490.
4
Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review.牙种植体的软组织管理:最有效的技术有哪些?一项Cochrane系统评价。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Autumn;5(3):221-38.
5
The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview.种植体周围表型和种植体美学并发症。当代概述。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):212-223. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12709. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Comparative Results of Single Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Placed and Loaded with Different Protocols: A Long-Term (7 to 10 years) Retrospective Multicenter Study.单植入体比较研究:有无激光微螺纹颈圈植入及不同负载方案的长期(7-10 年)回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):841-849. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7605.
7
A 10-year report from a multicentre randomised controlled trial: Immediate non-occlusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients.一项多中心随机对照试验的10年报告:部分牙列缺损患者中种植牙的即刻非咬合式与早期负重对比研究
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(3):219-230.
8
Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Parameters and Crestal Bone Loss Around Immediately Loaded and Delayed Loaded Implants in Smokers and Non-Smokers: 5-Year Follow-Up Results.比较吸烟和非吸烟患者中即刻负载和延迟负载种植体周围软组织参数和牙槽骨吸收:5 年随访结果。
J Periodontol. 2017 Jan;88(1):3-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160427. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
9
A 5-year report from a multicentre randomised clinical trial: immediate non-occlusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients.一项多中心随机临床试验的5年报告:部分牙列缺损患者牙种植体即刻非咬合与早期负载的比较
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):209-19.
10
Peri-implant conditions around sintered porous-surfaced (SPS) implants. A 36-month prospective cohort study.烧结多孔表面(SPS)种植体周围的种植体周围状况。一项为期36个月的前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):212-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12311. Epub 2014 Jan 3.