• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

悲剧提供学习机会。

Tragedies Provide Learning Opportunities.

作者信息

Callaway David

出版信息

ED Manag. 2016 Sep;28(9):100-104.

PMID:29787653
Abstract

With the increasing frequency of mass-casualty events, the American College of Emergency Physicians has assembled a High Threat Task Force to look for ways to improve the emergency response to these events. The panel intends to focus on training and operations, but the ultimate goal is to find ways to eliminate preventable deaths. The panel intends to standardize and unify improvement efforts that have thus far been disparate. The co-chairman of the panel says one of the biggest gaps is the lack of evidence-based guidelines for how emergency personnel should respond to mass-shooting events. Noting that the incident command structure was created for fighting wildfires, the co-chairman of the task force notes that mass-shooting events require a more dynamic leadership response.

摘要

随着大规模伤亡事件的频率不断增加,美国急诊医师学会组建了一个高威胁特别工作组,以寻求改善对这些事件的应急响应的方法。该小组打算专注于培训和行动,但最终目标是找到消除可预防死亡的方法。该小组打算规范和统一迄今为止分散的改进工作。该小组的联合主席表示,最大的差距之一是缺乏关于应急人员应如何应对大规模枪击事件的循证指南。特别工作组的联合主席指出, incident command structure 是为应对野火而设立的,并指出大规模枪击事件需要更具动态性的领导应对措施。 (注:原文中“incident command structure”未给出准确中文释义,可根据具体语境灵活处理,这里保留英文以便理解。)

相似文献

1
Tragedies Provide Learning Opportunities.悲剧提供学习机会。
ED Manag. 2016 Sep;28(9):100-104.
2
Preparing for Active Shooters and Hostile Events.为应对主动射击者和敌对事件做准备。
EMS World. 2017 Mar;46(3):35-42.
3
Joint Committee to Create a National Policy to Enhance Survivability from Mass Casualty Shooting Events: Hartford Consensus II.制定增强大规模伤亡枪击事件生存能力国家政策联合委员会:《哈特福德共识II》
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Mar;218(3):476-8, 478.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Respect for the mass casualty incident in Aurora.向奥罗拉的大规模伤亡事件致敬。
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):102. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.12.003.
5
Mass casualty disasters: who should run the show?大规模伤亡灾难:该由谁来掌控局面?
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;48(6):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.069. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
The Night Dallas Seemed More Like Afghanistan.达拉斯的那个夜晚,仿佛更像是在阿富汗。
ED Manag. 2016 Sep;28(9):97-100.
7
Prehospital Medical Response to Active Shooter Incidents-The Rescue Task Force Concept.针对活跃枪手事件的院前医疗响应——救援特遣部队概念
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 May;46(3):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.02.004.
8
EMS WORLD ROUNDTABLE: Optimizing Active- Shooter Response How should we approach these challenging scenes?急救医学服务世界圆桌会议:优化应对主动射击者的策略 我们应如何应对这些具有挑战性的场景?
EMS World. 2017 Mar;46(3):26-34.
9
The Hartford Consensus to improve survivability in mass casualty events: Process to policy.《哈特福德共识》:提高大规模伤亡事件中的生存能力——从过程到政策
Am J Disaster Med. 2014 Winter;9(1):67-71. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2014.0143.
10
3 Echo: concept of operations for early care and evacuation of victims of mass violence.3 回声:大规模暴力事件受害者早期救治和撤离的行动概念。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Aug;29(4):421-8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14000557. Epub 2014 Jun 9.