• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌联合尺寸与下颌前牙槽骨厚度之间的关系

Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

作者信息

Foosiri Pimchanok, Mahatumarat Korapin, Panmekiate Soontra

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):54-62. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar.

DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar
PMID:29791685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5962248/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between symphysis dimensions and alveolar bone thickness (ABT) of the mandibular anterior teeth.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography images of 51 patients were collected and measured. The buccal and lingual ABT of the mandibular anterior teeth was measured at 3 and 6 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and at the root apices. The symphysis height and width were measured. The symphysis ratio was the ratio of symphysis height to symphysis width. Kendall's tau correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationships between the variables at a 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

The mandibular anterior teeth lingual and apical ABT positively correlated with symphysis width (p<0.05). Moreover, these thicknesses negatively correlated with the symphysis ratio (p<0.05). Symphysis widths and ratios showed higher correlation coefficients with total and buccal apical ABT, compared with lingual ABT. Buccal ABT at 3 and 6 mm apical to the CEJ was not significantly correlated with most symphysis dimensions. The mean thickness of the buccal alveolar bone at the upper root half was only 0.2-0.6 mm, which was very thin, when compared with other regions.

CONCLUSION

For mandibular anterior teeth, the apical alveolar bone and lingual alveolar bone tended to be thicker in patients with a wide and short symphysis, compared to those with a narrow and long symphysis. Buccal alveolar bone was, in general, very thin and did not show a significant relationship with most symphysis dimensions.

摘要

目的

确定下颌前牙联合部尺寸与牙槽骨厚度(ABT)之间的关系。

方法

收集并测量了51例患者的锥束计算机断层扫描图像。在下颌前牙牙骨质-釉质界(CEJ)根尖3和6毫米处以及根尖处测量下颌前牙的颊侧和舌侧ABT。测量联合部高度和宽度。联合部比率为联合部高度与联合部宽度之比。采用肯德尔tau相关系数在0.05显著性水平下确定变量之间的关系。

结果

下颌前牙舌侧和根尖ABT与联合部宽度呈正相关(p<0.05)。此外,这些厚度与联合部比率呈负相关(p<0.05)。与舌侧ABT相比,联合部宽度和比率与总根尖和颊侧根尖ABT的相关系数更高。CEJ根尖3和6毫米处的颊侧ABT与大多数联合部尺寸无显著相关性。与其他区域相比,上半根处颊侧牙槽骨的平均厚度仅为0.2 - 0.6毫米,非常薄。

结论

对于下颌前牙,联合部宽短的患者根尖牙槽骨和舌侧牙槽骨往往比联合部狭长的患者厚。一般来说,颊侧牙槽骨非常薄,与大多数联合部尺寸无显著关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/8a2620ccf930/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/2f64f2214098/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/c77540c43606/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/e81e3c2bad9e/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/8a2620ccf930/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/2f64f2214098/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/c77540c43606/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/e81e3c2bad9e/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d031/5962248/8a2620ccf930/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00054-gf4.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌联合尺寸与下颌前牙槽骨厚度之间的关系
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):54-62. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar.
2
[Morphological analysis of alveolar bone of anterior mandible in high-angle skeletal class II and class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography].[锥形束计算机断层扫描评估高角骨性安氏II类和III类错牙合畸形下颌前部牙槽骨的形态学分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Feb 18;50(1):98-103.
3
Symphysis morphology and mandibular alveolar bone thickness in patients with β-thalassemia major and different growth patterns.β-地中海贫血患者不同生长模式下的下颌骨联合形态和牙槽骨厚度。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 May 23;27(2):e22205. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.2.e22205.oar. eCollection 2022.
4
The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion.正常咬合状态下下颌尖牙和前磨牙处牙槽骨的厚度。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):1115-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000767.
5
Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.下颌前骨厚度与切牙和尖牙角度的关系:CBCT 研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1567-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2255-3. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
Correlation between buccal and alveolar bone widths at the central incisors according to cone-beam-computed tomography.根据锥形束计算机断层扫描评估中切牙颊侧与牙槽骨宽度之间的相关性。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Jan;22(1):79-84. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_320_18.
7
Comparison of Periodontal Biotypes Between Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Teeth: A Clinical and Radiographic Study.上颌与下颌前牙牙周生物型的比较:一项临床与影像学研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;37(4):533-539. doi: 10.11607/prd.2848.
8
Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.上颌前牙和前磨牙颊牙槽骨尺寸的评估:锥形束 CT 研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1514-9.
9
Relationship between buccal alveolar bone thickness and crown-to-root dimensions around mandibular first and second molars: A cone-beam-computed tomography-based study.颊牙槽骨厚度与下颌第一、二磨牙冠根比的关系:基于锥形束 CT 的研究。
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(4):725-733. doi: 10.3233/THC-202587.
10
Three-dimensional evaluation of root dimensions and alveolar ridge width of maxillary lateral incisors in patients with unilateral agenesis.单侧牙缺失患者上颌侧切牙根尺寸和牙槽嵴宽度的三维评估
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0144-y. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Movement of Mandibular Incisors in Patients With Skeletal Class III During the Surgical Orthodontic Treatment.骨性III类患者外科正畸治疗中下颌切牙的移动
Cureus. 2025 Jan 17;17(1):e77588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77588. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible: a cone beam computed tomography study.即刻种植在前颌骨:锥形束 CT 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04111-1.
3
The Accuracy of Lateral Cephalogram for Measuring Alveolar Bone Thickness and Root Diameter on Mandibular Incisors.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of mandibular anterior alveolus in different skeletal patterns.不同骨骼类型下颌前牙区牙槽骨的评估
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0135-z. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
2
Relationship of Anterior Alveolar Dimensions with Mandibular Divergence in Class I Malocclusion - A Cephalometric Study.安氏Ⅰ类错牙合中前牙槽尺寸与下颌偏斜的关系——一项头影测量研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC29-33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18973.7743. Epub 2016 May 1.
3
Evaluation of Bone Thickness and Density in the Lower Incisors' Region in Adults with Different Types of Skeletal Malocclusion using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
头颅侧位片测量下颌切牙牙槽骨厚度和牙根直径的准确性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;12(12):3159. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123159.
4
Symphysis morphology and mandibular alveolar bone thickness in patients with β-thalassemia major and different growth patterns.β-地中海贫血患者不同生长模式下的下颌骨联合形态和牙槽骨厚度。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 May 23;27(2):e22205. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.2.e22205.oar. eCollection 2022.
5
Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review.前牙和后牙的颊侧骨厚度——一项系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 30;9(12):1663. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121663.
6
Correlation between facial growth patterns and cortical bone thickness assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in young adult untreated patients.年轻成年未治疗患者中锥形束计算机断层扫描评估的面部生长模式与皮质骨厚度之间的相关性
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Mar;33(3):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
How well do integrated 3D models predict alveolar defects after treatment with clear aligners?使用透明牙套治疗后,整合的 3D 模型对牙槽骨缺损的预测效果如何?
Angle Orthod. 2021 May 1;91(3):313-319. doi: 10.2319/042220-342.1.
8
Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships.不同矢状和垂直骨骼关系下的下颌联合尺寸。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.062. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
Cone beam computed tomography analysis of the edentulous mandibular symphysis.无牙下颌正中联合的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估不同类型骨骼错牙合畸形成人下切牙区的骨厚度和密度
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):630-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1733.
4
Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估骨骼I类和II类错牙合畸形中的牙槽骨厚度和下切牙位置。
Korean J Orthod. 2013 Jun;43(3):134-40. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.134. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
5
Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns.安氏 I 类和 III 类错[牙合]患者不同垂直骨面型的下切牙牙槽代偿和正中联合部的变化。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):948-55. doi: 10.2319/011913-48.1. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.不同垂直生长型患者的裂隙和窗畸形的锥形束 CT 评估。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):868-74. doi: 10.2319/111211-702.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.颊骨高度和厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描影像测量的准确性和可靠性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):734-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021.
8
Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients.未治疗患者下颌切牙骨支持的计算机断层评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.030.
9
Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.采用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估 I 类和 II 类 1 分类错(牙合)患者的裂隙和窗型。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):133.e1-7; discussion 133-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.021.
10
Mandibular thickness measurements in young dentate adults.年轻恒牙列成年人下颌骨厚度测量
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Sep;135(9):920-3. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.109.