• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线公民科学项目中的认知文化:项目、反项目和认知主体。

The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Aug;48(4):564-588. doi: 10.1177/0306312718778806. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.1177/0306312718778806
PMID:29792116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6108042/
Abstract

In the past decade, some areas of science have begun turning to masses of online volunteers through open calls for generating and classifying very large sets of data. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epistemic culture of a large-scale online citizen science project, the Galaxy Zoo, that turns to volunteers for the classification of images of galaxies. For this task, we chose to apply the concepts of programs and antiprograms to examine the 'essential tensions' that arise in relation to the mobilizing values of a citizen science project and the epistemic subjects and cultures that are enacted by its volunteers. Our premise is that these tensions reveal central features of the epistemic subjects and distributed cognition of epistemic cultures in these large-scale citizen science projects.

摘要

在过去的十年中,一些科学领域开始通过公开呼吁,让大量在线志愿者参与进来,以生成和分类非常庞大的数据集合。本研究旨在调查一个大规模在线公民科学项目——星系动物园的认识文化,该项目依靠志愿者对星系图像进行分类。为此,我们选择应用程序和反程序的概念来检验在公民科学项目的动员价值和其志愿者所实施的认识主体和文化之间产生的“基本张力”。我们的前提是,这些张力揭示了这些大规模公民科学项目中的认识主体和认识文化的分布式认知的核心特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fbd/6108042/b295e1cac7db/10.1177_0306312718778806-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fbd/6108042/b295e1cac7db/10.1177_0306312718778806-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fbd/6108042/b295e1cac7db/10.1177_0306312718778806-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects.在线公民科学项目中的认知文化:项目、反项目和认知主体。
Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Aug;48(4):564-588. doi: 10.1177/0306312718778806. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Galaxy zoo: Science content knowledge of citizen scientists.星系动物园:公民科学家的科学内容知识。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Aug;28(6):636-651. doi: 10.1177/0963662519840222. Epub 2019 May 19.
3
Mapping epistemic cultures and learning potential of participants in citizen science projects.映射公民科学项目参与者的认知文化和学习潜力。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):540-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12701. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
4
What Motivates Volunteers to Engage in Health-Related Citizen Science Initiatives? A Case Study of Our Outdoors.是什么激励志愿者参与健康相关的公民科学活动?以我们的户外活动为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 23;17(19):6950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196950.
5
Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects' success and longevity.公民科学参与环境科学研究:与项目成功及持久性相关的关键因素。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;89(3 Suppl):2229-2245. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720160548. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Making citizen science count: Best practices and challenges of citizen science projects on plastics in aquatic environments.让公民科学发挥作用:水生环境中塑料的公民科学项目的最佳实践和挑战。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Aug;145:271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Dark citizen science.暗公民科学。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Feb;33(2):142-157. doi: 10.1177/09636625231203470. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
8
Can Observation Skills of Citizen Scientists Be Estimated Using Species Accumulation Curves?能否使用物种累积曲线来评估公民科学家的观察技能?
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 9;10(10):e0139600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139600. eCollection 2015.
9
Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment.协商系统中的公民科学:参与、认知不公正与公民赋权
Minerva. 2022;60(4):489-508. doi: 10.1007/s11024-022-09467-8. Epub 2022 May 9.
10
Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science.量化在线公民科学:公众参与科学的动态和人口统计学。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 21;18(11):e0293289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293289. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
An epistemology for democratic citizen science.民主公民科学的认识论。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Nov 15;10(11):231100. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231100. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science.将人群转变为社区:在线公民科学的集体。
Soc Stud Sci. 2022 Jun;52(3):399-424. doi: 10.1177/03063127211058791. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Materializing Exposure: Developing an Indexical Method to Visualize Health Hazards Related to Fossil Fuel Extraction.具象化暴露:开发一种索引方法以可视化与化石燃料开采相关的健康危害。
Engag Sci Technol Soc. 2017;3:426-463. doi: 10.17351/ests2017.123.
2
What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.什么是公民科学?——一项科学计量学元分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 14;11(1):e0147152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152. eCollection 2016.
3
The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: migratory birds and climate change.
公民科学在全球研究中的无形影响力:候鸟与气候变化
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e106508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106508. eCollection 2014.
4
Working data together: the accountability and reflexivity of digital astronomical practice.共同工作数据:数字天文学实践的责任和反思性。
Soc Stud Sci. 2014 Apr;44(2):243-70. doi: 10.1177/0306312713509705.
5
Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions.科学家眼中的公民科学:方法论、认识论和伦理维度。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):107-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513497324. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
6
Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge.不纯的科学:艾滋病、激进主义与知识的政治
Med Soc (Berkeley). 1996:1-466.
7
Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing.大众流行病学与有毒废物污染:外行与专业人士的认知方式
J Health Soc Behav. 1992 Sep;33(3):267-81.