John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.
To determine if offering patients a choice of adjunctive nonpharmacologic pain management during first-trimester aspiration abortion results in lower pain scores when compared with standard care.
We enrolled women receiving first-trimester aspiration abortion at the University of Hawaii. We randomized patients to standard care (control) or standard care plus a choice of nonpharmacologic pain management options (intervention). Standard care was ibuprofen 800 mg orally at least 30 min preprocedure, lidocaine paracervical block and anticipatory guidance from the provider. We measured pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale immediately postprocedure with adequate sample size to detect a 20-mm difference in pain scores.
Seventy-four women participated in the trial and reported an overall mean pain score of 61.9±27.0. Participants in the control and intervention groups reported similar overall mean pain scores (control 60.6±28.8, intervention 63.3±28.5). We found procedure time, complications, provider-perceived case difficulty and patient satisfaction with pain management to be similar between groups. Providers underestimated participant pain compared to participants' own scores (mean physician estimate of participant pain: 46.3±18.5, mean participant pain score: 61.9±27.0, p<.01). Intervention group participants most frequently selected ambient music (59%) as the nonpharmacologic intervention. Forty-one percent (15/37) of participants in the intervention group chose more than one nonpharmacologic intervention.
Participants in the control group reported similar pain scores to participants in the intervention group. Procedure time and difficulty were similar between the two groups.
Incorporating patient choice into a nonpharmacologic pain management model did not result in lower pain scores. This approach did increase the patient's visit time. Abortion providers frequently use nonpharmacologic pain management in the United States, and these techniques did not negatively impact patient pain scores in our study.
比较在接受早孕吸宫术流产的患者中提供辅助性非药物性疼痛管理选择与标准护理,哪种方式可降低疼痛评分。
我们纳入了在夏威夷大学接受早孕吸宫术流产的女性。我们将患者随机分为标准护理(对照组)或标准护理加非药物性疼痛管理选择(干预组)。标准护理为术前至少 30 分钟口服布洛芬 800mg、宫颈旁利多卡因阻滞及提供者的预期指导。我们使用 100mm 视觉模拟评分法在术后即刻评估疼痛,样本量足够大,可检测到疼痛评分相差 20mm。
74 名女性参与了试验,报告的总体平均疼痛评分为 61.9±27.0。对照组和干预组的参与者报告的总体平均疼痛评分相似(对照组 60.6±28.8,干预组 63.3±28.5)。我们发现组间手术时间、并发症、提供者感知的病例难度和患者对疼痛管理的满意度相似。与参与者的自评分数相比,提供者低估了参与者的疼痛(医生对参与者疼痛的平均估计:46.3±18.5,参与者的平均疼痛评分:61.9±27.0,p<.01)。干预组参与者最常选择背景音乐(59%)作为非药物干预措施。干预组 41%(15/37)的参与者选择了一种以上的非药物干预措施。
对照组的参与者报告的疼痛评分与干预组相似。两组的手术时间和难度相似。
将患者选择纳入非药物性疼痛管理模式并未导致疼痛评分降低。这种方法确实增加了患者的就诊时间。在美国,流产提供者经常使用非药物性疼痛管理,在我们的研究中,这些技术并未对患者的疼痛评分产生负面影响。