Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 21.
The aim of this study was to construct and evaluate a summary score of reporting completeness based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR).
We included 200 reports published in 2013 randomly selected from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. We summed the scores for the 12 items for the intervention and control groups for each trial to create a summary score from 0 to 24. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the item hierarchy, category function and reliability of the TIDieR checklist and determine the extent to which the summary score can be considered an interval-level measure.
The data fit the Rasch model suggesting the summary score is able to assess the completeness of reporting. The items appeared to target the study sample well (average report measure was 0.48 [0.87] compared to the average item measure of 0.0 [1.82]), and progressed in a logical manner, suggesting the summary score can be used as a single variable. The low internal consistency (0.62) suggests the summary score may only be able to discriminate between the least and most detailed reports.
Our results support the use of the TIDieR summary score; however, we encourage the replication of our study in an independent data set.
本研究旨在基于干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)构建并评估报告完整性的综合评分。
我们纳入了 2013 年从物理治疗证据数据库中随机选择的 200 篇报告。我们对每个试验的干预组和对照组的 12 项评分进行求和,创建一个 0 到 24 分的综合评分。使用 Rasch 分析来调查 TIDieR 清单的项目层次结构、类别功能和可靠性,并确定综合评分在多大程度上可以被视为区间水平测量。
数据符合 Rasch 模型,表明综合评分能够评估报告的完整性。这些项目似乎很好地针对研究样本(平均报告测量值为 0.48 [0.87],而平均项目测量值为 0.0 [1.82]),并且以逻辑方式进展,表明综合评分可以用作单一变量。低内部一致性(0.62)表明综合评分可能只能区分最不详细和最详细的报告。
我们的结果支持使用 TIDieR 综合评分;然而,我们鼓励在独立数据集复制我们的研究。