• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危前列腺癌男性的主动监测:来自前列腺癌结局登记-Victoria 的证据。

Active surveillance of men with low risk prostate cancer: evidence from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria.

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 4;208(10):439-443. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00559. Epub 2018 May 28.

DOI:10.5694/mja17.00559
PMID:29793403
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the practice of active surveillance (AS) for men with low risk prostate cancer by examining the characteristics of those who commence AS, the rate of adherence to accepted AS follow-up protocols over 2 years, and factors associated with good adherence. Design, setting: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of data collected from 38 sites participating in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria.

PARTICIPANTS

Men diagnosed with prostate cancer between August 2008 and December 2014 aged 75 years or less at diagnosis, managed by AS for at least 2 years, and with an ISUP grade group of 3 or less (Gleason score no worse than 4 + 3 = 7).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adherence to an AS schedule consisting of at least three PSA measurements and at least one biopsy in the 2 years following diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 1635 men eligible for inclusion in the analysis, 433 (26.5%) adhered to the AS protocol. The significant predictor of adherence in the multivariate model was being diagnosed in a private hospital (v public hospital: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.42-2.37; P < 0.001). Significant predictors of non-adherence included being diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate (v transrectal ultrasound biopsy [TRUS]: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P < 0.001) or transperineal biopsy (v TRUS: OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.52; P < 0.001), and being 66 years of age or more at diagnosis (v < 55 years: OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Almost three-quarters of men who had prostate cancer with low risk of disease progression did not have follow-up investigations consistent with standard AS protocols. The clinical consequences of this shortcoming are unknown.

摘要

目的

通过考察开始主动监测 (AS) 的患者特征、两年内接受 AS 随访方案的依从率以及与良好依从性相关的因素,来描述低危前列腺癌患者的 AS 实践。设计、设置:回顾性队列研究;对参与前列腺癌结局注册维多利亚州(Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria)的 38 个站点收集的数据进行分析。参与者:2008 年 8 月至 2014 年 12 月期间诊断为年龄 75 岁或以下的低危前列腺癌患者,至少接受 2 年 AS 治疗,且国际泌尿病理学会评分系统(International Society of Urological Pathology)分级分组为 3 级或更低(Gleason 评分最高为 4+3=7)。主要观察指标:在诊断后 2 年内至少进行 3 次前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 测量和至少 1 次活检,以评估 AS 方案的依从性。结果:在符合分析条件的 1635 名男性中,433 名(26.5%)符合 AS 方案。多变量模型中的显著预测因素是在私立医院(与公立医院相比,调整优势比 [aOR],1.83;95%置信区间,1.42-2.37;P<0.001)而非公立医院诊断。非依从的显著预测因素包括经尿道前列腺切除术(与经直肠超声活检 [TRUS] 相比,OR,0.54;95%置信区间,0.39-0.77;P<0.001)或经会阴活检(与 TRUS 相比,OR,0.32;95%置信区间,0.19-0.52;P<0.001)诊断以及诊断时年龄 66 岁或以上(与 <55 岁相比,OR,0.65;95%置信区间,0.45-0.92;P=0.015)。结论:近四分之三患有低疾病进展风险前列腺癌的男性未接受符合 AS 标准方案的随访检查。这种缺陷的临床后果尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Active surveillance of men with low risk prostate cancer: evidence from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria.低危前列腺癌男性的主动监测:来自前列腺癌结局登记-Victoria 的证据。
Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 4;208(10):439-443. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00559. Epub 2018 May 28.
2
Patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria from 2008 to 2011.2008 年至 2011 年期间维多利亚州被诊断患有前列腺癌的男性的护理模式。
Med J Aust. 2013 Jun 3;198(10):540-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11241.
3
The current use of active surveillance in an Australian cohort of men: a pattern of care analysis from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.澳大利亚男性队列中当前主动监测的使用情况:来自维多利亚前列腺癌登记处的护理模式分析。
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115 Suppl 5:50-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13049.
4
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度的风险分层,可能会减少接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性不必要的后续活检程序。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.在真实队列中对前列腺癌进行主动监测:比较 PRIAS 合格和 PRIAS 不合格患者的结局。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;1(3):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients.前列腺癌主动监测的随访:严格遵守方案对不符合 PRIAS 标准的患者仍然重要。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Sep;2(5):483-489. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.主动监测策略对低危前列腺癌男性的成本效益分析。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):910-917. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.055. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
8
Differences in treatment choices for localised prostate cancer diagnosed in private and public health services.在私人和公共医疗服务机构诊断出的局限性前列腺癌的治疗选择方面存在差异。
Med J Aust. 2020 Nov;213(9):411-417. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50794. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US.美国低危前列腺癌管理中主动监测应用的时间趋势和变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439.
10
A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.对于接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性,阴性确认性活检并不能保护他们免于组织学分级进展。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
2
Using real-world, population-level data to assess the uptake of active surveillance for low-grade prostate cancer before and after the release of clinical guidelines.利用真实世界的人群水平数据,评估临床指南发布前后低级别前列腺癌主动监测的采用情况。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Jun;19(6):158-164. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.9019.
3
Low-risk prostate lesions: An evidence review to inform discussion on losing the "cancer" label.
低危前列腺病变:一项旨在为“去癌症化”讨论提供证据的综述。
Prostate. 2023 May;83(6):498-515. doi: 10.1002/pros.24493. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management.前列腺癌检测与管理的现代模式。
Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 17;217(8):424-433. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51722. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
5
Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.开放根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者尿控和性功能结局的比较:维多利亚州基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00966-0.
6
Large variation in conservative management of low-risk prostate cancer in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰低风险前列腺癌保守治疗的巨大差异。
BJU Int. 2022 Jun;130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):17-19. doi: 10.1111/bju.15698. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
7
Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort.主动监测前列腺癌的自然史:使用英国队列中 PRECISE 建议的 MRI 进行分层。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1644-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.在评估前列腺癌真实世界主动监测结果的观察性研究中定义和衡量依从性:一项系统评价
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
9
Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.评估局限性前列腺癌主动监测的风险。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1028-1039. doi: 10.1111/hex.12912. Epub 2019 May 16.