Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Save the Elephants, Nairobi 00200, Kenya.
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 30;285(1879). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0286.
Repeated use of the same areas may benefit animals as they exploit familiar sites, leading to consistent home ranges over time that can span generations. Changing risk landscapes may reduce benefits associated with home range fidelity, however, and philopatric animals may alter movement in response to new pressures. Despite the importance of range changes to ecological and evolutionary processes, little tracking data have been collected over the long-term nor has range change been recorded in response to human pressures across generations. Here, we investigate the relationships between ecological, demographic and human variables and elephant ranging behaviour across generations using 16 years of tracking data from nine distinct female social groups in a population of elephants in northern Kenya that was heavily affected by ivory poaching during the latter half of the study. Nearly all groups-including those that did not experience loss of mature adults-exhibited a shift north over time, apparently in response to increased poaching in the southern extent of the study area. However, loss of mature adults appeared to be the primary indicator of range shifts and expansions, as generational turnover was a significant predictor of range size increases and range centroid shifts. Range expansions and northward shifts were associated with higher primary productivity and lower poached carcass densities, while westward shifts exhibited a trend to areas with higher values of primary productivity and higher poached carcass densities relative to former ranges. Together these results suggest a trade-off between resource access, mobility and safety. We discuss the relevance of these results to elephant conservation efforts and directions meriting further exploration in this disrupted society of a keystone species.
重复使用相同的区域可能对动物有益,因为它们可以利用熟悉的地点,从而随着时间的推移形成一致的家域范围,甚至可以跨越几代。然而,不断变化的风险景观可能会降低与家域保真度相关的益处,并且恋地性动物可能会改变其运动模式以应对新的压力。尽管范围变化对生态和进化过程很重要,但长期以来,收集到的追踪数据很少,也没有记录到范围变化以响应几代人的人类压力。在这里,我们使用肯尼亚北部一个大象种群的 16 年追踪数据,调查了生态、人口和人类变量与跨代大象范围行为之间的关系,该种群在研究后半期受到象牙偷猎的严重影响。几乎所有的群体——包括那些没有成年个体损失的群体——随着时间的推移都表现出向北的迁移,显然是对研究区域南部偷猎活动增加的反应。然而,成年个体的损失似乎是范围变化和扩张的主要指标,因为代际更替是范围大小增加和范围质心转移的重要预测指标。范围的扩大和向北迁移与较高的初级生产力和较低的偷猎尸体密度有关,而向西的迁移则与以前的范围相比,表现出向初级生产力和偷猎尸体密度较高的地区的趋势。这些结果表明,在资源获取、流动性和安全性之间存在权衡。我们讨论了这些结果对大象保护工作的意义,以及在这个受到干扰的关键物种社会中值得进一步探索的方向。