E. Stergiopoulos is a medical student, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. O. Fernando is a cultural anthropologist and clinical research project coordinator, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M.A. Martimianakis is associate professor and director of medical education scholarship, Department of Pediatrics, and scientist and strategic lead international, Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1550-1559. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002300.
Medical students with disabilities hold firsthand knowledge as health care recipients, yet face barriers to disclosure and support. Their experiences provide a unique lens for understanding professional identity construction; this study explored how disabled medical students experience training as both patients and trainees.
The authors conducted qualitative interviews with 10 medical students at the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine with self-identified disabilities. They performed textual analysis of documents concerning medical student wellness from 13 Canadian universities, including policies, student services, and student blogs (July 2016 to March 2017). Using principles of critical discourse analysis, the authors coded the interviews and texts to identify operating discourses and core themes, drawing from sociocultural theories of professional identity construction and the hidden curriculum.
Two dominant discourses emerged from the interviews and texts, revealing institutionalized notions of the perceived "good student" and "good patient." These roles held contradictory demands, demonstrating how institutions often implicitly and explicitly framed wellness as a means to optimal academic performance. Two additional themes, "identity compartmentalization" and "identity intersection," captured students' experiences navigating identities as patients and trainees. Although students lacked explicit opportunities to express their expertise as patients in the formal curriculum, their experiences in both roles led to improved communication, advocacy, and compassion.
Institutional discourses around disability and academic performance hold material implications for curricular content, clinical teaching, and availability of supports in medical school. By repositioning students' experiences with disability as sources of expertise, this study highlights opportunities for teaching compassionate care.
残疾医学生作为医疗服务的接受者,拥有第一手知识,但他们在披露和获得支持方面面临障碍。他们的经历为理解专业身份构建提供了独特的视角;本研究探讨了残疾医学生作为患者和受训者的培训经历。
作者对多伦多大学医学院的 10 名自认为有残疾的医学生进行了定性访谈。他们对来自 13 所加拿大大学的有关医学生健康的文件(包括政策、学生服务和学生博客)进行了文本分析(2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 3 月)。作者采用批判话语分析的原则,对访谈和文本进行编码,以确定运作话语和核心主题,这些主题借鉴了专业身份构建的社会文化理论和隐性课程。
访谈和文本中出现了两个主导话语,揭示了机构对所谓“好学生”和“好病人”的观念。这些角色存在相互矛盾的要求,表明机构经常隐含和明确地将健康视为最佳学术表现的手段。另外两个主题,“身份分割”和“身份交叉”,捕捉到了学生作为患者和受训者的身份经历。尽管学生在正式课程中缺乏表达作为患者的专业知识的明确机会,但他们在这两个角色中的经历导致了更好的沟通、倡导和同情心。
围绕残疾和学业表现的机构话语对课程内容、临床教学和医学院支持的可用性具有实质性影响。通过将学生的残疾经历重新定位为专业知识的来源,本研究强调了教授富有同情心的护理的机会。