Lemasson Morgane, Rochette Louis, Galvão Filipe, Poulet Emmanuel, Lacroix André, Lecompte Maxime, Auriacombe Marc, Patry Simon, Haesebaert Frédéric
Bureau d'Information et d'Études en Santé des Populations, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, Canada.
PsyR2 Team, U 1028, INSERM and UMR 5292, CNRS, Center for Neuroscience Research of Lyon, CH Le Vinatier, Lyon-1 University, Bron, France.
J ECT. 2018 Dec;34(4):220-226. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000508.
Although the dosage of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) stimulus has a major impact on the efficacy and safety of this treatment, the method used to determine an optimal dosage remains a matter of debate.
We investigated factors influencing the seizure threshold (ST) in a large-sample study and compared age-based and titration dosing methods in terms of charge.
A retrospective study examined data from 503 patients across France and Canada. The patients underwent right unilateral (RUL) or bitemporal (BT) ECT during a titration session before undergoing ECT. Seizure threshold and charge differences between age-based and titration-predicted methods were derived for each RUL and BT patient and compared according to sex, age, and anesthetic agents.
Based on our results, ST is a function of electrode placement, sex, age, and anesthetic agents. Titration and age-based methods led to completely different patterns of charges for the same electrode placement, especially in elderly and in women in the RUL group. Regression models showed that differences between the age-based and titration methods varied with respect to age, sex, and anesthetic agent. Specifically, significant effects of sex and age were observed for RUL ECT and of sex and anesthetics for BT ECT.
This study revealed that several factors significantly influence the prediction of ECT dose, depending on individuals and treatment modalities. Caution should be exercised when using nonindividualized methods to calculate ST.
尽管电休克治疗(ECT)刺激剂量对该治疗的疗效和安全性有重大影响,但确定最佳剂量的方法仍存在争议。
我们在一项大样本研究中调查了影响癫痫阈值(ST)的因素,并比较了基于年龄和滴定给药方法在电量方面的差异。
一项回顾性研究检查了来自法国和加拿大的503例患者的数据。这些患者在接受ECT之前,在滴定疗程中接受了右侧单侧(RUL)或双侧颞部(BT)ECT。为每个RUL和BT患者得出基于年龄和滴定预测方法之间的癫痫阈值和电量差异,并根据性别、年龄和麻醉剂进行比较。
根据我们的结果,癫痫阈值是电极放置、性别、年龄和麻醉剂的函数。滴定法和基于年龄的方法在相同电极放置下导致了完全不同的电量模式,尤其是在RUL组的老年患者和女性患者中。回归模型表明,基于年龄和滴定法之间的差异随年龄、性别和麻醉剂而变化。具体而言,对于RUL ECT观察到性别和年龄的显著影响,对于BT ECT观察到性别和麻醉剂的显著影响。
本研究表明,取决于个体和治疗方式,有几个因素会显著影响ECT剂量的预测。在使用非个体化方法计算癫痫阈值时应谨慎。