• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据vojta疗法进行持续手动压力刺激对心率变异性的影响。

The effects of sustained manual pressure stimulation according to Vojta Therapy on heart rate variability.

作者信息

Opavsky Jaroslav, Slachtova Martina, Kutin Miroslav, Hok Pavel, Uhlir Petr, Opavska Hana, Hlustik Petr

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018 Sep;162(3):206-211. doi: 10.5507/bp.2018.028. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.5507/bp.2018.028
PMID:29795544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The physiotherapeutic technique of Vojta reflex locomotion is often accompanied by various autonomic activity changes and unpleasant sensations. It is unknown whether these effects are specific to Vojta Therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare changes in cardiac autonomic control after Vojta reflex locomotion stimulation and after an appropriate sham stimulation.

METHODS

A total of 28 young healthy adults (20.4 - 25.7 years) were enrolled in this single-blind randomized cross-over study. Participants underwent two modes of 20-minute sustained manual pressure stimulation on the surface of the foot on two separate visits. One mode used manual pressure on the lateral heel, i.e., in a zone employed in the Vojta Therapy (active stimulation). The other mode used pressure on the lateral ankle (control), in an area not included among the active zones used by Vojta Therapy and whose activation does not evoke manifestations of reflex locomotion. Autonomic nervous system activity was evaluated using spectral analysis of heart rate variability before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The active stimulation was perceived as more unpleasant than the control stimulation. Heart rate variability parameters demonstrated almost identical autonomic responses after both stimulation types, showing either modest increase in parasympathetic activity, or increased heart rate variability with similar contribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate changes of cardiac autonomic control in both active and control stimulation, without evidence for a significant difference between the two.

摘要

背景

vojta反射运动的物理治疗技术常伴随着各种自主神经活动变化和不适感。尚不清楚这些效应是否是vojta疗法所特有的。因此,本研究的目的是比较vojta反射运动刺激后和适当的假刺激后心脏自主神经控制的变化。

方法

本单盲随机交叉研究共纳入28名年轻健康成年人(20.4 - 25.7岁)。参与者在两次单独就诊时接受了两种20分钟持续手动足部表面压力刺激模式。一种模式是在足跟外侧施加手动压力,即vojta疗法中使用的区域(主动刺激)。另一种模式是在踝关节外侧施加压力(对照),该区域不在vojta疗法使用的活跃区域内,其激活不会引起反射运动表现。干预前后通过心率变异性频谱分析评估自主神经系统活动。

结果

主动刺激比对照刺激更令人不适。两种刺激类型后心率变异性参数显示出几乎相同的自主神经反应,要么副交感神经活动适度增加,要么心率变异性增加,副交感神经和交感神经活动贡献相似。

结论

结果表明主动刺激和对照刺激均有心脏自主神经控制变化,但两者之间无显著差异。

相似文献

1
The effects of sustained manual pressure stimulation according to Vojta Therapy on heart rate variability.根据vojta疗法进行持续手动压力刺激对心率变异性的影响。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018 Sep;162(3):206-211. doi: 10.5507/bp.2018.028. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Cortical activity during sensorial tactile stimulation in healthy adults through Vojta therapy. A randomized pilot controlled trial.健康成年人通过 Vojta 疗法进行感觉触觉刺激时的皮质活动。一项随机对照的初步试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jan 21;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00824-4.
3
Modulation of the sensorimotor system by sustained manual pressure stimulation.持续手动压力刺激对感觉运动系统的调节作用。
Neuroscience. 2017 Apr 21;348:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
4
Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation induces changes in cardiac autonomic regulation in cluster headache.蝶腭神经节刺激可诱发丛集性头痛患者心脏自主神经调节的变化。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Sep;38(5):808-815. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12484. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
[Cardiovascular neuroregulation and rhythms of the autonomic nervous system: frequency domain analysis].[心血管神经调节与自主神经系统节律:频域分析]
Cardiologia. 1999 Mar;44(3):281-7.
6
Transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury: Assessment of autonomic nervous system activity.脊髓损伤个体的经颅直流电刺激:自主神经系统活动评估
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(2):159-169. doi: 10.3233/RNN-160685.
7
Effects of massage as a recuperative technique on autonomic modulation of heart rate and cardiorespiratory parameters: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.按摩作为一种恢复技术对心率自主调节和心肺参数的影响:一项随机临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 25;19(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2830-1.
8
Transcranial direct current stimulation improves the QT variability index and autonomic cardiac control in healthy subjects older than 60 years.经颅直流电刺激可改善60岁以上健康受试者的QT变异性指数和自主心脏控制能力。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 16;11:1687-1695. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S116194. eCollection 2016.
9
Regular physical exercise improves cardiac autonomic and muscle vasodilatory responses to isometric exercise in healthy elderly.规律的体育锻炼可改善健康老年人对等长运动的心脏自主神经和肌肉血管舒张反应。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Jun 28;12:1021-1028. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S120876. eCollection 2017.
10
Autonomic nervous system changes in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome.慢性盆腔疼痛综合征男性的自主神经系统变化
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2170-4; discussion 2174. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.144.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical review of the evidence for Vojta Therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对沃伊塔疗法证据的批判性综述:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 22;15:1391448. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1391448. eCollection 2024.
2
Synergy of Muscle and Cortical Activation through Vojta Reflex Locomotion Therapy in Young Healthy Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.在年轻健康成年人中通过vojta反射运动疗法实现肌肉与皮质激活的协同作用:一项初步随机对照试验
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 1;11(12):3203. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123203.
3
Differential Effects of Sustained Manual Pressure Stimulation According to Site of Action.
根据作用部位不同,持续手动压力刺激的不同效果。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17;13:722. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00722. eCollection 2019.