Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的生存结果:支架类型的炒作有何意义?来自印度医疗体系的教训。

Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, India.

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0196830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196830. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

A prospective, multicenter study was initiated by the Government of Maharashtra, India, to determine predictors of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, and to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients undergoing PCI under government-funded insurance. The present analysis included 4595 patients managed between August 2012 and November 2016 at any of 110 participating centers. Using the classical multivariable regression and propensity-matching approach, we found age to be the most important predictor of 1-year mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year post-PCI. However, using machine learning methods to account for unmeasured confounders and bias in this large observational study, we determined total stent length and number of stents deployed as the most important predictors of 1-year survival, followed by age and employment status. The unadjusted death rates were 5.0% and 3.8% for the BMS and DES groups, respectively (p = 0.185, log-rank test). The rate of re-hospitalization (p<0.001) and recurrence of unstable angina (p = 0.08) was significantly lower for DESs than for BMSs. Increased use of DES after 2015 (following establishment of a price cap on DESs) was associated with a sharp decrease in adjusted hazard ratios of DESs versus BMSs (from 0.94 in 2013 to 0.58 in 2016), suggesting that high price was limiting DES use in some high-risk patients. Since stented length and stent number were the most important predictors of survival outcomes, adopting an ischemia-guided revascularization strategy is expected to help improve outcomes and reduce procedural costs. In the elderly, PCI should be reserved for cases where the benefits outweigh the higher risk of the procedure. As unemployed patients had poorer long-term outcomes, we expect that implementation of a post-PCI cardiovascular rehabilitation program may improve long-term outcomes.

摘要

一项由印度马哈拉施特拉邦政府发起的前瞻性、多中心研究旨在确定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗冠状动脉疾病的长期预后的预测因素,并比较在政府资助的保险下接受 PCI 的患者中药物洗脱支架(DES)和裸金属支架(BMS)的效果。本分析包括 2012 年 8 月至 2016 年 11 月期间在 110 个参与中心中的任何一个中心接受治疗的 4595 例患者。使用经典多变量回归和倾向匹配方法,我们发现年龄是 PCI 后 1 年死亡率和靶病变血运重建的最重要预测因素。然而,使用机器学习方法来考虑这个大型观察性研究中的未测量混杂因素和偏差,我们确定总支架长度和植入支架的数量是 1 年生存率的最重要预测因素,其次是年龄和就业状况。未调整的死亡率分别为 BMS 组和 DES 组的 5.0%和 3.8%(p=0.185,对数秩检验)。DES 组的再住院率(p<0.001)和不稳定型心绞痛复发率(p=0.08)明显低于 BMS 组。DES 的使用量在 2015 年之后增加(在 DES 的价格上限建立后),DES 与 BMS 的调整后的危险比显著降低(从 2013 年的 0.94 降至 2016 年的 0.58),这表明高价格限制了某些高危患者对 DES 的使用。由于支架长度和支架数量是生存结果的最重要预测因素,采用缺血指导的血运重建策略有望改善结果并降低程序成本。在老年人中,PCI 应保留用于受益大于手术风险的情况。由于失业患者的长期预后较差,我们预计实施 PCI 后心血管康复计划可能会改善长期预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9e/5967815/a38547d2bffe/pone.0196830.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验