Maloley Lauren, Morgan Linda A, High Robin, Suh Donny W
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018 May 1;55(3):152-158. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20180220-02.
To determine the prevalence of pediatric ophthalmologists who have performed wrong-site surgery, propose risk factors leading to these errors, and assess the effectiveness of the Universal Protocol in preventing them.
Approximately 1,000 pediatric ophthalmology surgeons were invited to complete an anonymous 10-question survey. Respondents were divided into two groups: those who performed or attempted wrong-site surgery (wrong-site surgery group) and those who had never performed a wrong-site surgery (intended surgical site group). The risk factors (ie, marking procedure, years in practice, surgical experience, adherence to the Universal Protocol time-out, and operating room factors) were compared between groups.
Of the 156 respondents, 56.4% never performed, 9% attempted, and 34.6% performed a wrong-site surgery. The use of any procedure to mark the eye decreased the likelihood of a wrong-site surgery by 61% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39; P = .069). A lower likelihood of error occurred when a single individual led the time-out and multiple individuals participated in checking the accuracy of the time-out. Surgeons in practice for less than 15 years had a lower likelihood of performing a wrong-site surgery (OR = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19 to 0.72; P = .003). Factors not significantly associated with wrong-site surgeries were the number of surgeries performed per year (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) and the number of operating rooms used.
In concordance with previous reports of other surgical specialties, self-reported error in pediatric ophthalmology is not uncommon. This study highlighted important practices that can be easily adopted by surgeons to decrease the likelihood of wrong-site surgeries. First, marking the surgical site must be part of the preoperative preparation. Second, a single designated individual should lead the time-out and the surgeon should be directly involved in all steps of the time-out process. Third, surgeons who have been in practice for more than 15 years may require additional safeguards to ensure that the correct surgery is performed and to monitor their complacency. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(3):152-158.].
确定实施过手术部位错误手术的儿科眼科医生的比例,提出导致这些错误的风险因素,并评估《通用协议》在预防此类错误方面的有效性。
邀请约1000名儿科眼科外科医生完成一项包含10个问题的匿名调查。受访者分为两组:实施或尝试过手术部位错误手术的医生(手术部位错误手术组)和从未实施过手术部位错误手术的医生(预期手术部位组)。对两组之间的风险因素(即标记程序、从业年限、手术经验、遵守《通用协议》暂停程序情况以及手术室因素)进行比较。
在156名受访者中,56.4%从未实施过,9%尝试过,34.6%实施过手术部位错误手术。使用任何程序标记眼睛可使手术部位错误手术的可能性降低61%(优势比[OR]=0.39;P=0.069)。当由单个人员主导暂停程序且多个人员参与检查暂停程序的准确性时,出错的可能性较低。从业不到15年的外科医生实施手术部位错误手术的可能性较低(OR=0.37;95%置信区间[CI]=0.19至0.72;P=0.003)。与手术部位错误手术无显著关联的因素是每年进行的手术数量(OR=0.66;95%CI=0.35至1.24;P=0.20)以及使用的手术室数量。
与其他外科专业先前的报告一致,儿科眼科中自我报告的错误并不罕见。本研究突出了外科医生可轻松采用的重要做法,以降低手术部位错误手术的可能性。首先,标记手术部位必须作为术前准备的一部分。其次,应由单个指定人员主导暂停程序,且外科医生应直接参与暂停程序的所有步骤。第三,从业超过15年的外科医生可能需要额外的保障措施,以确保实施正确的手术并监测他们的自满情绪。[《小儿眼科与斜视杂志》。2018;55(3):152 - 158。]