• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人健康管理局中与错误手术事件相关的通用协议上下游的错误。

Errors upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol associated with wrong surgery events in the Veterans Health Administration.

作者信息

Paull Douglas E, Mazzia Lisa M, Neily Julia, Mills Peter D, Turner James R, Gunnar William, Hemphill Robin

机构信息

VA National Center for Patient Safety - Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

VA National Center for Patient Safety - Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.030. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.030
PMID:25873162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Universal Protocol has been associated with the prevention of wrong surgery procedures; however, such events still occur. This article explores wrong surgery events, defined as those incorrect procedures (wrong site, wrong side, wrong procedure, wrong patient, wrong level, wrong implant) that would have occurred despite the Universal Protocol including the performance of a time-out by the surgical team. Understanding why some of these events are not caught by the steps of the Universal Protocol, culminating in the time-out, can help the field to add upstream and downstream safeguards to help prevent these never events.

METHODS

The Veterans Health Administration database of root cause analyses was queried for all cases involving an incorrect surgical procedure between 2004 and 2013 to determine the relative frequency and characteristics of wrong surgery events because of errors upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol. This subgroup of wrong surgery events was selected from among all the wrong surgery events by 2 clinicians with expertise in patient safety (Kappa = .91).

RESULTS

Forty-eight cases of wrong surgery events because of upstream/downstream errors were analyzed, representing 16% of the 308 root cause analyses for wrong surgery events reported during this period. Upstream errors included mislabeling of specimens, while downstream errors were associated with ineffective intraoperative process. Surgical procedures that were particularly vulnerable included wrong level spine operations, wrong patient prostatectomies, wrong implant cataract procedures, and wrong site skin lesion excisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrong surgery events can and do occur despite adherence to Universal Protocol including a time-out. The prevention of incorrect procedures requires complementary safety behaviors and technologies to address errors that occur upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol and the time-out.

摘要

背景

《通用协议》与预防手术程序错误相关联;然而,此类事件仍有发生。本文探讨手术错误事件,即那些即便实施了《通用协议》(包括手术团队进行暂停核查)仍会发生的不正确程序(手术部位错误、手术侧别错误、手术操作错误、患者错误、手术节段错误、植入物错误)。了解为何这些事件中的一些未被《通用协议》的步骤(最终是暂停核查)发现,有助于该领域增加上游和下游保障措施,以预防这些严重不良事件。

方法

查询退伍军人健康管理局的根本原因分析数据库,获取2004年至2013年期间所有涉及不正确手术程序的病例,以确定《通用协议》上下游错误导致的手术错误事件的相对频率和特征。这一手术错误事件亚组由两名患者安全领域的专家从所有手术错误事件中挑选出来(卡帕值 = 0.91)。

结果

分析了48例因上下游错误导致的手术错误事件,占该时期报告的308例手术错误事件根本原因分析的16%。上游错误包括标本标记错误,而下游错误与术中流程无效有关。特别容易出现错误的手术程序包括脊柱节段错误手术、患者错误的前列腺切除术、植入物错误的白内障手术以及手术部位错误的皮肤病变切除术。

结论

尽管遵循了包括暂停核查在内的《通用协议》,手术错误事件仍有可能且确实会发生。预防不正确程序需要补充安全行为和技术,以解决《通用协议》及暂停核查上下游出现的错误。

相似文献

1
Errors upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol associated with wrong surgery events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中与错误手术事件相关的通用协议上下游的错误。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.030. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
2
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.手术室内外不正确的外科手术程序。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1028-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126.
3
Surgical Confusions in Ophthalmology: Description, Analysis, and Prevention of Errors from 2006 through 2017.《眼科手术失误:2006 年至 2017 年的错误描述、分析与预防》
Ophthalmology. 2020 Mar;127(3):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Incidence and root cause analysis of wrong-site pain management procedures: a multicenter study.错误部位疼痛管理程序发生率及根本原因分析:一项多中心研究。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):711-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf892d.
5
Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events.错误部位手术、遗留手术器械和手术火灾:手术无预警事件的系统回顾。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):796-805. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0301.
6
Assessment of Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside the Operating Room: A Follow-up Study From US Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.手术室内外不当手术程序评估:来自美国退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心的随访研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5147.
7
Wrong Site Spine Surgery in the Veterans Administration.退伍军人事务部的脊柱手术误切部位事件
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;32(10):454-457. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000771.
8
Examining Wrong Eye Implant Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration With a Focus on Prevention: A Preliminary Report.审视退伍军人健康管理局中错误眼植入不良事件并着重于预防:一份初步报告。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;14(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000170.
9
The occurrence of wrong-site surgery self-reported by candidates for certification by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery.美国骨科委员会认证候选人报告的手术部位错误事件。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jan 4;94(1):e2(1-12). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00524.
10
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report.手术室内外的错误手术操作:一份随访报告。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1235-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.171. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing Wrong-Level Spine Surgery.预防脊柱手术定位错误。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2025;133:1-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61601-3_1.
2
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Spine Pathways and the Role of Perioperative Checklists.术后加速康复(ERAS)脊柱路径与围手术期检查表的作用。
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2024;49:73-94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42398-7_5.
3
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.
4
Detection and Remediation of Misidentification Errors in Radiology Examination Ordering.放射科检查医嘱错误的检测与纠正。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):79-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402730. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Incidence of Wrong-Site Surgery List Errors for a 2-Year Period in a Single National Health Service Board.单一国民保健制度委员会两年间手术部位错误列表错误的发生率。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000426.
6
Wrong intraocular lens events-what lessons have we learned? A review of incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System: 2010-2014 versus 2003-2010.人工晶状体植入失误事件——我们吸取了哪些教训?对向国家报告与学习系统报告的事件的回顾:2010 - 2014年与2003 - 2010年对比
Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1049-55. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.87. Epub 2016 May 13.