Suppr超能文献

上气道阻塞评估:吸气峰流速和临床 COPD 问卷。

Upper airway obstruction assessment: Peak inspiratory flow and clinical COPD Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, Faculty Medicine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty Medicine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Oct;43(5):1303-1311. doi: 10.1111/coa.13149. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Spirometric evaluation of upper airway obstruction (UAO) is not commonly performed by Otolaryngologists. In addition, functional evaluation of UAO by flow-volume loops (FVL) is not available in all clinical settings. More recently, peak inspiratory flow (PIF) has proven to be a useful tool to monitor UAO at the patient's bedside. The aim of this work is to assess the role of PIF measured with a simple flow metre (In-Check method) as a standardised, simple, non-invasive tool in quantifying chronic and subacute UAO in a routine clinical practice. In addition, a Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), previously validated to assess the psychophysical status in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis, was utilised to evaluate respiratory function in UAO.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy 2 subjects, an UAO group of 26 patients and a control group of 46 healthy subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The ability of PIF values to discriminate between the UAO group and the control group was assessed using a ROC curve. A Spearman rank correlation was used to test the relationship between PIF measurements and the global CCQ score. Additionally, an analysis of CCQ at domain and items levels was performed.

RESULTS

Peak inspiratory flow values were accurate, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.98 (P < .05) for differentiating the control group from the UAO group. A threshold PIF value of 170 L/min was found for diagnosing UAO. An inconclusive negative trend was found (r = -.19; P = .35) between PIF values and CCQ global score. Concerning CCQ, the symptoms domain was the most affected by UAO, higher than mental domains (P < .001) as well as functional domains (P < .01). Exertional dyspnoea and cough were the items that obtained the highest disturbed scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Peak inspiratory flow is a non-invasive, quantitative parameter to evaluate the severity of UAO. Testing can be easily performed in a routine clinical setting, with a non-expensive hand-held device, and could help medical follow-up programmes and prevent emergency situations. However, FVL may be necessary for further assessment of UAO diseases. The CCQ confirms that exertional dyspnoea is the main symptom of UAO, but cough remains a common symptom.

摘要

目的

耳鼻喉科医生通常不会对上气道阻塞(UAO)进行肺量计评估。此外,并非所有临床环境都可提供 UAO 的流量-容积环(FVL)功能评估。最近,吸气峰流速(PIF)已被证明是一种可在患者床边监测 UAO 的有用工具。本研究旨在评估使用简单流量计(In-Check 法)测量的 PIF 作为一种标准化、简单、非侵入性工具,在常规临床实践中定量评估慢性和亚急性 UAO 的作用。此外,先前经过验证用于评估喉气管狭窄患者心理物理状态的临床 COPD 问卷(CCQ)也被用于评估 UAO 中的呼吸功能。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

大学教学医院。

参与者

70 名受试者,UAO 组 26 名患者和对照组 46 名健康受试者。

主要观察指标

采用 ROC 曲线评估 PIF 值区分 UAO 组和对照组的能力。Spearman 秩相关用于测试 PIF 测量值与 CCQ 总分之间的关系。此外,还进行了 CCQ 领域和项目水平的分析。

结果

PIF 值具有较高的准确性,区分对照组和 UAO 组的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.98(P<.05)。发现 PIF 阈值为 170 L/min 可用于诊断 UAO。PIF 值与 CCQ 总分之间存在不确定的负趋势(r =-.19;P=.35)。在 CCQ 方面,症状域受 UAO 影响最大,高于精神域(P<.001)和功能域(P<.01)。运动性呼吸困难和咳嗽是得分最高的受干扰项目。

结论

吸气峰流速是一种非侵入性、定量参数,可用于评估 UAO 的严重程度。测试可以在常规临床环境中使用经济实惠的手持设备轻松进行,有助于医疗随访计划并预防紧急情况。然而,FVL 可能需要进一步评估 UAO 疾病。CCQ 证实运动性呼吸困难是 UAO 的主要症状,但咳嗽仍然是常见症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验