Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
JAMA. 2018 May 22;319(20):2116-2126. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6024.
Surgical occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAAO) may be performed during concurrent cardiac surgery. However, few data exist on the association of LAAO with long-term risk of stroke, and some evidence suggests that this procedure may be associated with subsequent development of atrial fibrillation (AF).
To evaluate the association of surgical LAAO performed during cardiac surgery with risk of stroke, mortality, and development of subsequent AF.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using a large US administrative database that contains data from adult patients (≥18 years) with private insurance or Medicare Advantage who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery between January 1, 2009, and March 30, 2017, with final follow-up on March 31, 2017. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 76 dimensions to compare those with vs without LAAO, stratified by history of prior AF at the time of surgery.
Surgical LAAO vs no surgical LAAO during cardiac surgery.
The primary outcomes were stroke (ie, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative AF (AF within 30 days after surgery among patients without prior AF) and long-term AF-related health utilization (event rates of outpatient visits and hospitalizations).
Among 75 782 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (mean age, 66.0 [SD, 11.2] years; 2 2091 [29.2%] women, 25 721 [33.9%] with preexisting AF), 4374 (5.8%) underwent concurrent LAAO, and mean follow-up was 2.1 (SD, 1.9) years. In the 8590 propensity score-matched patients, LAAO was associated with a reduced risk of stroke (1.14 vs 1.59 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.96]; P = .03) and mortality (3.01 vs 4.30 events per 100 person-years; HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60-0.84]; P < .001). LAAO was associated with higher rates of AF-related outpatient visits (11.96 vs 10.26 events per person-year; absolute difference, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.60-1.80] events per person-year; rate ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.24]; P < .001) and hospitalizations (0.36 vs 0.32 event per person-year; absolute difference, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02-0.06] event per person-year; rate ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.21]; P = .002). In patients with prior AF (6438/8590 [74.9%]) with vs without LAAO, risk of stroke was 1.11 vs 1.71 events per 100 person-years (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P = .01) and risk of mortality was 3.22 vs 4.93 events per 100 person-years (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.80]; P < .001), respectively. In patients without prior AF (2152/8590 [25.1%]) with vs without LAAO, risk of stroke was 1.23 vs 1.26 events per 100 person-years (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.54-1.68]), risk of mortality was 2.30 vs 2.49 events per 100 person-years (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.61-1.37]), and risk of postoperative AF was 27.7% vs 20.2% events per 100 person-years (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.22-1.73]; P < .001). The interaction term between prior AF and LAAO was not significant (P = .29 for stroke and P = .16 for mortality).
Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, concurrent surgical LAAO, compared with no surgical LAAO, was associated with reduced risk of subsequent stroke and all-cause mortality. Further research, including from randomized clinical trials, is needed to more definitively determine the role of surgical LAAO.
在同期心脏手术中,可能会对左心耳(LAAO)进行外科夹闭。然而,关于 LAAO 与长期中风风险的关联数据很少,一些证据表明,该手术可能与随后发生的房颤(AF)有关。
评估同期心脏手术中 LAAO 与中风、死亡率和随后发生 AF 的风险之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:回顾性队列研究,使用大型美国行政数据库,该数据库包含有私人保险或 Medicare Advantage 的成年患者(≥18 岁)的数据,这些患者在 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 30 日期间接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或瓣膜手术,最终随访时间为 2017 年 3 月 31 日。采用一对一倾向评分匹配来平衡 76 个维度的患者,以比较有或无 LAAO 的患者,按手术时是否有既往 AF 的病史进行分层。
心脏手术期间进行 LAAO 手术与不进行 LAAO 手术。
主要结局是中风(即缺血性中风或系统性栓塞)和全因死亡率。次要结局是术后 AF(既往无 AF 的患者手术后 30 天内发生的 AF)和与长期 AF 相关的健康利用(门诊就诊和住院的事件发生率)。
在接受心脏手术的 75782 名患者中(平均年龄 66.0[SD,11.2]岁;2209 名[29.2%]女性,25721 名[33.9%]患有既往 AF),4374 名(5.8%)患者同时进行了 LAAO,平均随访时间为 2.1(SD,1.9)年。在 8590 名经倾向评分匹配的患者中,LAAO 与降低中风风险相关(每 100 人年发生 1.14 次与 1.59 次事件;风险比[HR],0.73[95%CI,0.56-0.96];P=0.03)和死亡率(每 100 人年发生 3.01 次与 4.30 次事件;HR,0.71[95%CI,0.60-0.84];P<0.001)。LAAO 与更高的 AF 相关门诊就诊率相关(每 100 人年发生 11.96 次与 10.26 次事件;绝对差异,1.70[95%CI,1.60-1.80]次事件;率比,1.17[95%CI,1.10-1.24];P<0.001)和住院率(每 100 人年发生 0.36 次与 0.32 次事件;绝对差异,0.04[95%CI,0.02-0.06]次事件;率比,1.13[95%CI,1.05-1.21];P=0.002)。在有既往 AF(6438/8590[74.9%])的患者中,LAAO 与无 LAAO 相比,中风风险为 1.11 次与 1.71 次事件(HR,0.68[95%CI,0.50-0.92];P=0.01),死亡率风险为 3.22 次与 4.93 次事件(HR,0.67[95%CI,0.56-0.80];P<0.001)。在无既往 AF(2152/8590[25.1%])的患者中,LAAO 与无 LAAO 相比,中风风险为 1.23 次与 1.26 次事件(HR,0.95[95%CI,0.54-1.68]),死亡率风险为 2.30 次与 2.49 次事件(HR,0.92[95%CI,0.61-1.37]),术后 AF 风险为 27.7%与 20.2%事件(HR,1.46[95%CI,1.22-1.73];P<0.001)。既往 AF 和 LAAO 之间的交互项无统计学意义(P=0.29 用于中风,P=0.16 用于死亡率)。
在接受心脏手术的患者中,与不进行 LAAO 相比,同期进行 LAAO 与随后发生中风和全因死亡率降低相关。需要进一步的研究,包括随机临床试验,以更明确地确定 LAAO 的作用。