• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床 T1-3N0-1M0 期胸段食管鳞癌行根治性放化疗或手术治疗:倾向评分匹配分析。

Definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery for clinical T1-3N0-1M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.009
PMID:29802029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare overall survival in patients with clinical T1-3N0-1 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery or definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT).

METHODS

We used propensity-score matching to derive 1:1 cohorts of surgery versus definitive CRT. Statistical analysis was performed using χ or Fisher's exact tests. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and survival distributions were compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to analyze the factors affecting overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients treated with surgery and 252 treated with definitive CRT were included. 129 (38.6%) of 334 patients had recurrence after surgery versus 118 (46.8%) of 252 after definitive CRT. Before matching, the median overall survival were 39.5 months (95% CI, 28.8-50.2) and 23.5 months (95% CI, 18.5-28.5) (P < 0.001) in the surgery and definitive CRT group, respectively. After matching (112 patients in each treatment group), median overall survival was 43.6 months (95% CI, 28.1-59.1) with surgery versus 19.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-24.2) with CRT (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, surgery was associated with better overall survival compared with definitive CRT.

摘要

背景

比较手术或根治性放化疗(CRT)治疗临床 T1-3N0-1 期胸段食管鳞癌患者的总生存率。

方法

我们使用倾向评分匹配,从手术组和根治性 CRT 组中得出 1:1 的匹配队列。使用 χ 或 Fisher 精确检验进行统计学分析。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存图估计生存函数,并使用对数秩检验比较生存分布。使用 Cox 比例风险模型分析影响总生存率的因素。

结果

共纳入 334 例手术治疗患者和 252 例根治性 CRT 治疗患者。334 例手术患者中有 129 例(38.6%)发生术后复发,252 例根治性 CRT 患者中有 118 例(46.8%)发生术后复发。在匹配前,手术组和根治性 CRT 组的中位总生存期分别为 39.5 个月(95%CI,28.8-50.2)和 23.5 个月(95%CI,18.5-28.5)(P<0.001)。匹配后(每组各 112 例患者),手术组的中位总生存期为 43.6 个月(95%CI,28.1-59.1),CRT 组为 19.3 个月(95%CI,14.4-24.2)(P<0.001)。

结论

在这项回顾性分析中,与根治性 CRT 相比,手术与更好的总生存率相关。

相似文献

1
Definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery for clinical T1-3N0-1M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.临床 T1-3N0-1M0 期胸段食管鳞癌行根治性放化疗或手术治疗:倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 22.
2
Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.可切除食管鳞状细胞癌患者手术与根治性放化疗的比较:一项倾向评分分析
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;21(5):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0963-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Survival benefits of postoperative chemoradiation for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.术后放化疗对淋巴结阳性食管鳞癌的生存获益。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
4
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性放化疗对比新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 II 期到 III 期食管鳞癌。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2710-2721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.086. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Comparison Between Esophagectomy and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者行食管切除术与根治性放化疗的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr;107(4):1060-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.036. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Pre- versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期食管鳞癌的术前与术后放化疗。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;154(2):732-740.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Cervical Esophageal Cancer Treatment Strategies: A Cohort Study Appraising the Debated Role of Surgery.颈段食管癌治疗策略:一项评估手术有争议作用的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2747-2755. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6648-6. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery for patients with resectable esophageal cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.可切除食管癌患者同步放化疗与手术治疗的对比:国家癌症数据库分析。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3476-3485. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30763. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
Improved survival with definitive chemoradiation compared to definitive radiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A review of the National Cancer Database.与单纯放疗相比,明确放化疗可改善外阴鳞癌患者的生存:对国家癌症数据库的回顾。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiation therapy and surgery.同步放化疗和手术后食管鳞癌环周切缘的预后价值。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2013 Oct;76(10):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.日本食管癌学会编辑的《2022年食管癌诊疗指南》:第1部分。
Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):343-372. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2. Epub 2023 Mar 18.