Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Department O, section 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Denmark.
Danish Dementia Research Center, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, section 6922, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Denmark.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;28(7):783-794. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 23.
The pathophysiological processes of bipolar disorder (BD) may be detectable by the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers.
We aimed for the first time to review studies of CSF biomarkers in patients with BD compared to healthy control individuals (HC). We investigated the effect of diagnosis, age, gender, clinical state, medication, technical characteristics of tests, fasting state and, cognitive function if applicable.
We did a systematic review according to the PRISMA Statement based on comprehensive database searches for studies on cerebrospinal biomarkers in patients with bipolar disorder versus HC. Risk of bias was systematically assessed.
The search strategy identified 410 studies of which thirty-four fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 117 unique biomarkers were investigated, out of which 11 were evaluated in more than one study. Forty biomarkers showed statistically significant differences between BD and HC in single studies. Only the findings of elevated homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid were replicated across studies. Most studies had a cross sectional design and were influenced by risk of bias mainly due to small sample size, lack of data on mood state at the time of the CSF puncture and not considering potential confounders including age, gender, diagnoses, BMI, life style factors such as smoking, and psychotropic medication.
Specific monoamine CSF biomarkers may be related to the pathophysiology of BD. Future studies must aim at increasing the level of evidence by validating the positive findings in prospective studies with stringent methodology.
双相障碍(BD)的病理生理过程可能可以通过脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物来检测。
我们首次旨在综述与健康对照个体(HC)相比,BD 患者的 CSF 生物标志物研究。我们研究了诊断、年龄、性别、临床状态、药物、检测技术特征、禁食状态以及认知功能(如适用)对 CSF 生物标志物的影响。
我们根据 PRISMA 声明进行了系统评价,该声明基于对患者与 HC 进行比较的双相障碍脑脊液生物标志物研究的全面数据库检索。系统评估了偏倚风险。
搜索策略确定了 410 项研究,其中 34 项符合纳入标准。共研究了 117 个独特的生物标志物,其中 11 个在多项研究中进行了评估。40 个生物标志物在单项研究中显示 BD 与 HC 之间存在统计学显著差异。只有升高的高香草酸和 5-羟吲哚乙酸的发现在多个研究中得到了复制。大多数研究为横断面设计,受偏倚风险的影响,主要是由于样本量小、CSF 穿刺时情绪状态缺乏数据以及未考虑潜在混杂因素,包括年龄、性别、诊断、BMI、生活方式因素,如吸烟和精神药物。
特定的单胺 CSF 生物标志物可能与 BD 的病理生理学有关。未来的研究必须通过前瞻性研究严格的方法验证阳性发现来提高证据水平。