Suppr超能文献

双相障碍患者与健康个体脑脊液中的生物标志物:系统评价。

Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with bipolar disorder versus healthy individuals: A systematic review.

机构信息

Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Department O, section 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Denmark.

Danish Dementia Research Center, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, section 6922, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;28(7):783-794. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiological processes of bipolar disorder (BD) may be detectable by the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers.

AIM

We aimed for the first time to review studies of CSF biomarkers in patients with BD compared to healthy control individuals (HC). We investigated the effect of diagnosis, age, gender, clinical state, medication, technical characteristics of tests, fasting state and, cognitive function if applicable.

METHOD

We did a systematic review according to the PRISMA Statement based on comprehensive database searches for studies on cerebrospinal biomarkers in patients with bipolar disorder versus HC. Risk of bias was systematically assessed.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 410 studies of which thirty-four fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 117 unique biomarkers were investigated, out of which 11 were evaluated in more than one study. Forty biomarkers showed statistically significant differences between BD and HC in single studies. Only the findings of elevated homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid were replicated across studies. Most studies had a cross sectional design and were influenced by risk of bias mainly due to small sample size, lack of data on mood state at the time of the CSF puncture and not considering potential confounders including age, gender, diagnoses, BMI, life style factors such as smoking, and psychotropic medication.

CONCLUSION

Specific monoamine CSF biomarkers may be related to the pathophysiology of BD. Future studies must aim at increasing the level of evidence by validating the positive findings in prospective studies with stringent methodology.

摘要

背景

双相障碍(BD)的病理生理过程可能可以通过脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物来检测。

目的

我们首次旨在综述与健康对照个体(HC)相比,BD 患者的 CSF 生物标志物研究。我们研究了诊断、年龄、性别、临床状态、药物、检测技术特征、禁食状态以及认知功能(如适用)对 CSF 生物标志物的影响。

方法

我们根据 PRISMA 声明进行了系统评价,该声明基于对患者与 HC 进行比较的双相障碍脑脊液生物标志物研究的全面数据库检索。系统评估了偏倚风险。

结果

搜索策略确定了 410 项研究,其中 34 项符合纳入标准。共研究了 117 个独特的生物标志物,其中 11 个在多项研究中进行了评估。40 个生物标志物在单项研究中显示 BD 与 HC 之间存在统计学显著差异。只有升高的高香草酸和 5-羟吲哚乙酸的发现在多个研究中得到了复制。大多数研究为横断面设计,受偏倚风险的影响,主要是由于样本量小、CSF 穿刺时情绪状态缺乏数据以及未考虑潜在混杂因素,包括年龄、性别、诊断、BMI、生活方式因素,如吸烟和精神药物。

结论

特定的单胺 CSF 生物标志物可能与 BD 的病理生理学有关。未来的研究必须通过前瞻性研究严格的方法验证阳性发现来提高证据水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验