Suppr超能文献

主动脉远端狭窄的解剖学和临床特征及其在血管内动脉瘤修复后的影响。

Anatomic and clinical characterization of the narrow distal aorta and implications after endovascular aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1030-1038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.073. Epub 2018 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this analysis was to compare 1-year clinical outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with the EXCLUDER device in patients with standard and narrow aortic bifurcations (AOBs).

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from a 1055-participant subset of the multicenter Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT) treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2010 and September 2015. There were 117 patients with a narrow AOB (NB; defined as <16 mm) and 938 patients with a standard bifurcation (SB). The 30-day and 1-year morbidity, mortality, and reintervention outcomes were analyzed, with Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis conducted on freedom from mortality and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

The mean distal aortic neck diameter was 12.4 mm in the NB cohort and 25.3 mm in the SB cohort (P < .001), with NB patients also exhibiting significantly smaller diameter proximal aortic necks (P < .001). Patients in the NB cohort were more often female (25.6% vs 15.1%; P = .004) and with more severe comorbidity burden. There was a significantly higher rate of surgical cutdown access in the NB cohort (P < .001). Procedural survival was 100% in both groups. The 30-day mortality and safety outcomes were similar; however, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the SB cohort through 1 year (P = .02). The 1-year freedom from mortality was estimated as 92.1% in the SB cohort and 99.1% in the NB cohort. Freedom from reintervention was estimated as 95.1% in the SB cohort and 92.8% in the NB cohort at 1 year. Through 1-year follow-up, 24 SB patients (2.6%) and 4 NB patients (3.4%) exhibited an endoleak requiring reintervention (P > .99). Type II endoleaks represented 72% and 60% of treated endoleaks, respectively. Through 1 year, 10 SB patients (1.0%) and 2 NB patients (1.7%) exhibited occlusive/thrombotic events (P = .54). There were no reported instances of kinking, migration, fracture, compression, or dissection through 1 year in either cohort. One SB patient experienced thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair with the EXCLUDER device were comparable in the NB and SB cohorts. A narrow AOB was not found to be associated with a higher incidence of later limb occlusions or endoleaks. Female patients were disproportionately more likely to have a narrow AOB, which correlated with narrowed proximal necks and access vessels, and a more severe comorbidity burden.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在比较使用 EXCLUDER 装置进行血管内腹主动脉瘤修复后 1 年的临床结果,比较标准分叉型(SB)和狭窄分叉型(NB)主动脉瘤患者的结果。

方法

本研究前瞻性收集了 2010 年 8 月至 2015 年 9 月期间接受腹主动脉瘤修复治疗的多中心全球血管内主动脉治疗登记研究(GREAT)的 1055 名参与者中的 117 名 NB 患者和 938 名 SB 患者的数据。分析 30 天和 1 年的发病率、死亡率和再干预结果,通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线分析死亡率和再干预的无事件生存情况。

结果

NB 组的远端主动脉颈直径平均为 12.4mm,SB 组为 25.3mm(P<0.001),NB 组的近端主动脉颈直径也明显更小(P<0.001)。NB 组的女性患者比例明显更高(25.6% vs 15.1%;P=0.004),且合并症负担更严重。NB 组的手术切开进入率明显更高(P<0.001)。两组患者的手术即刻存活率均为 100%。30 天死亡率和安全性结果相似;然而,SB 组的全因死亡率在 1 年内明显更高(P=0.02)。SB 组 1 年的无死亡估计生存率为 92.1%,NB 组为 99.1%。SB 组 1 年的无再干预估计生存率为 95.1%,NB 组为 92.8%。1 年随访时,24 例 SB 患者(2.6%)和 4 例 NB 患者(3.4%)出现需要再次干预的内漏(P>.99)。分别有 72%和 60%的治疗内漏为 II 型内漏。1 年内,10 例 SB 患者(1.0%)和 2 例 NB 患者(1.7%)出现闭塞/血栓形成事件(P=0.54)。在两组中,1 年内均未报告扭结、迁移、骨折、压迫或夹层。1 例 SB 患者发生胸主动脉瘤破裂。

结论

使用 EXCLUDER 装置进行血管内动脉瘤修复后 1 年的结果,NB 组和 SB 组相当。狭窄的分叉型主动脉瘤并未导致后期肢体闭塞或内漏的发生率更高。女性患者更有可能出现狭窄分叉型主动脉瘤,这与近端瘤颈和入路血管狭窄以及更严重的合并症负担有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验