Novant Health University of Virginia Health System Culpeper Medical Center, Culpeper, Virginia.
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
J Voice. 2019 Sep;33(5):805.e21-805.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 May 24.
Twenty-three female Speech Communication Disorders (SCD) graduate students rated the desirability of 25 adjectives used to describe perceived speaker's affect (including attitude, emotion, etc). A three-point weighted scale-desirable = 3, in-between = 2, and undesirable = 1-was used and a "desirability score" was calculated for each of these adjectives. Afterward, students were asked to use these adjectives to describe the perceived communication affect of female speakers with voices characterized by "vocal fry" as well as seven other vocal qualities (rough, breathy, strained, loud, high pitch, low pitch, and soft/weak). Proficiency of the students in identification of each of these eight voice qualities was determined before the survey. A desirability score for each voice quality, with a focus on vocal fry, was calculated by averaging the sum of the weighted counts for each adjective used to describe that vocal quality. RESULTS: Ten adjectives were rated as desirable (eg, cool), two were rated as in-between (eg, nonaggressive), and 13 were rated as undesirable (eg, vain). Thirty-two percent used only undesirable adjectives to describe vocal fry; 64% used a mixture of desirable, in-between, and undesirable; and 5% used only desirable adjectives and one in-between adjective. The relative order of the desirability scores of the vocal qualities was low pitch (2.13), high pitch (2.11), loud (1.89), vocal fry (1.82), breathy (1.77), soft/weak (1.68), rough (1.46), and strained (1.08). A vocal quality profile for each adjective was created. Vocal fry was the primary vocal quality associated with the adjectives vain (56%), apathetic/disinterested (48%), sleepy (38%), relaxed/chill (38%), and bored/unengaged (36%). CONCLUSIONS: SCD graduate student participants rated the desirability of 25 adjectives used to describe the perceived speaker's affect (including attitude, emotion, etc), and a "desirability score" was calculated for each. Afterward, they used these adjectives to describe the perceived communication affect of female speakers with voices characterized by vocal fry. Most participants were undecided, 30% perceived it as undesirable, and only 5% perceived it as desirable. The desirability scoring system and the adjectives used in this study add to the growing literature focusing on how different vocal qualities influence the listener's perception of the speaker's affect.
23 名女性言语交际障碍(SCD)研究生对 25 个形容词进行了评价,这些形容词用于描述感知到的说话者的情感(包括态度、情绪等)。使用了三点加权量表——理想=3、中间=2、不理想=1——并为这些形容词中的每一个计算了一个“理想分数”。之后,学生们被要求用这些形容词来描述具有“声音粗糙”和其他七种声音特征的女性说话者的感知交流情感(声音粗糙、呼吸声、紧张、响亮、高音、低音、柔和/无力)。在调查之前,确定了学生识别这八种声音特征的熟练程度。通过计算用于描述每种声音特征的加权计数之和,为每种声音特征(重点是声音粗糙)计算了一个理想分数。结果:有 10 个形容词被评为理想(如酷),2 个形容词被评为中间(如不具有攻击性),13 个形容词被评为不理想(如自负)。32%的人只用不理想的形容词来形容声音粗糙;64%的人使用理想、中间和不理想的形容词混合使用;5%的人只用理想的形容词和一个中间的形容词。声音特征的理想分数的相对顺序为:低音(2.13)、高音(2.11)、响亮(1.89)、声音粗糙(1.82)、呼吸声(1.77)、柔和/无力(1.68)、粗糙(1.46)和紧张(1.08)。为每个形容词创建了一个声音特征轮廓。声音粗糙与自负(56%)、冷漠/不感兴趣(48%)、困倦(38%)、放松/冷静(38%)和无聊/不投入(36%)等形容词关系最为密切。结论:言语交际障碍研究生对 25 个用于描述感知到的说话者情感的形容词(包括态度、情绪等)的理想程度进行了评价,并为每个形容词计算了一个“理想分数”。之后,他们用这些形容词来描述具有声音粗糙特征的女性说话者的感知交流情感。大多数参与者犹豫不决,30%的人认为它不理想,只有 5%的人认为它理想。理想评分系统和本研究中使用的形容词增加了越来越多的文献,这些文献关注不同的声音特征如何影响听众对说话者情感的感知。