Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1539-1545. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0212.
Vocal fry is prevalent in everyday speech. However, whether the use of vocal fry is detrimental to voice production is unclear. This preliminary study assessed the effects of using continuous vocal fry on voice production measures and listener ratings.
Ten healthy individuals (equal male and female, mean age = 22.4 years) completed 2 counterbalanced sessions. In each session, participants read in continuous vocal fry or habitual voice quality for 30 min at a comfortable intensity. Continuous vocal fry was simulated. Phonation threshold pressure (PTP10 and PTP20), cepstral peak prominence, and vocal effort ratings were obtained before and after the production of each voice quality. Next, 10 inexperienced listeners (equal male and female, mean age = 24.1 years) used visual analog scales to rate paired samples of continuous vocal fry and habitual voice quality for naturalness, employability, and amount of listener concentration.
PTP10 and vocal effort ratings increased after 30 min of continuous vocal fry. Inexperienced listeners rated continuous vocal fry more negatively than the habitual voice quality.
Thirty minutes of simulated, continuous vocal fry worsened some voice measures when compared with a habitual voice quality. Samples of continuous vocal fry were rated as significantly less employable, less natural, and requiring greater listener concentration as compared with samples of habitual voice quality. Future studies should include habitual users of vocal fry to investigate speech stimulability and adaptation with cueing to further understand pathogenesis of vocal fry.
在日常言语中,声音嘶哑很常见。然而,使用声音嘶哑是否对发声不利尚不清楚。本初步研究评估了连续使用声音嘶哑对发声测量和听众评分的影响。
10 名健康个体(男女各半,平均年龄=22.4 岁)完成了 2 次平衡会话。在每次会话中,参与者以舒适的强度连续 30 分钟用连续声音嘶哑或习惯性声音质量朗读。模拟连续声音嘶哑。在产生每种声音质量之前和之后,获得了声门关闭压力(PTP10 和 PTP20)、倒频谱峰突出度和发声努力评分。接下来,10 名无经验的听众(男女各半,平均年龄=24.1 岁)使用视觉模拟量表对连续声音嘶哑和习惯性声音质量的配对样本进行评分,以评估自然度、可雇佣性和听众注意力集中程度。
连续声音嘶哑 30 分钟后,PTP10 和发声努力评分增加。无经验的听众对连续声音嘶哑的评价比习惯性声音质量更差。
与习惯性声音质量相比,模拟连续 30 分钟的声音嘶哑会使一些声音测量值变差。与习惯性声音质量的样本相比,连续声音嘶哑的样本被评为明显缺乏可雇佣性、不自然和需要更大的听众注意力。未来的研究应包括习惯性使用声音嘶哑的患者,以调查言语可激发性和适应能力,并通过提示进一步了解声音嘶哑的发病机制。