Suppr超能文献

一期和二期贵要静脉转位造瘘患者特异性因素及结果的比较。

Comparison of patient-specific factors and outcomes for one- and two-stage basilic vein transposition fistulas.

作者信息

Shevitz Andrew J, Kim Ann H, Morrow Katherine L, Johnson David J, Campos Patricia R, Kashyap Vikram S, Wong Virginia L

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1482-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The decision to perform a one- or two-stage basilic vein transposition (BVT) arteriovenous fistula often depends on factors such as the vessel's diameter, the patient's disposition, and the surgeon's preference. This study's aim was to analyze patency by BVT staging technique and to identify patient-specific characteristics associated with outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent one- or two-stage BVT at our institution between 2008 and 2013 was performed. Comparisons of age, sex, race, and associated comorbidities were made. Clinical course was followed for 2 years after fistula construction, comparing maturation rate, thrombosis, stenosis, steal, and catheter infections. Continuous variables were expressed as means or medians and compared across stage and maturation groups by t-test; differences between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher exact test. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate patency rates and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

There were 49 one-stage and 169 two-stage BVTs examined. The mean age of the patients at time of construction was 58 years and 61 years for one-stage and two-stage patients, respectively. There was no difference in mean proximal, mid, or distal basilic vein diameters between the groups. Fistula maturation was similar between stage groups, with primary failure affecting 26.5% of one-stage and 24.3% of two-stage BVTs (P = .78). Across one- and two-stage BVTs, 2-year primary patency rates were 51% and 52%, respectively (P = .68); primary assisted patency, 66% and 85% (P = .05); and secondary patency, 64% and 78% (P = .26). Multivariate logistic regression showed a trend toward diabetics at higher risk for primary failure (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.55; P = .07). For two-stage BVT, the median interstage period between operations lasted 105.00 (interquartile range, 77.00-174.50) days and was associated with a large proportion of the overall primary failures (19/41 [46%]) and catheter-related infections (12/20 [60%]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates similar maturation, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and complication rates in a large series of BVTs constructed using a one- or two-stage transposition technique regardless of vein diameter. Diabetes was associated with primary failure by either technique. High proportions of overall primary failures and catheter-related infections observed in two-stage BVT occurred during the interstage, suggesting that a one-stage technique should be considered over a two-stage approach to minimize the risk of catheter infection and to decrease time to maturity.

摘要

目的

决定进行一期或二期贵要静脉转位(BVT)动静脉内瘘术通常取决于血管直径、患者情况及外科医生的偏好等因素。本研究旨在分析BVT分期技术的通畅率,并确定与预后相关的患者特异性特征。

方法

对2008年至2013年在本机构接受一期或二期BVT的所有患者进行回顾性研究。比较患者的年龄、性别、种族及相关合并症。在造瘘术后随访2年,比较成熟率、血栓形成、狭窄、窃血及导管感染情况。连续变量以均值或中位数表示,通过t检验比较各分期及成熟组间差异;分类变量间差异采用Fisher精确检验评估。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析以计算通畅率,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。

结果

共检查了49例一期和169例二期BVT。一期和二期患者造瘘时的平均年龄分别为58岁和61岁。两组间贵要静脉近端、中段或远端的平均直径无差异。各分期组间瘘管成熟情况相似,一期BVT的原发性失败率为26.5%,二期为24.3%(P = 0.78)。在一期和二期BVT中,2年的原发性通畅率分别为51%和52%(P = 0.68);原发性辅助通畅率分别为66%和85%(P = 0.05);继发性通畅率分别为64%和78%(P = 0.26)。多因素逻辑回归显示,糖尿病患者原发性失败风险有升高趋势(比值比,1.60;95%置信区间,0.95 - 2.55;P = 0.07)。对于二期BVT,手术间的中位间隔期为105.00(四分位间距,77.00 - 174.50)天,且与大部分原发性失败(19/41 [46%])及导管相关感染(12/20 [60%])相关。

结论

本研究表明,在大量采用一期或二期转位技术构建的BVT中,无论静脉直径如何,其成熟、原发性通畅、原发性辅助通畅、继发性通畅及并发症发生率相似。糖尿病与两种技术的原发性失败均相关。二期BVT中观察到的高比例原发性失败及导管相关感染发生在手术间期,提示应考虑采用一期技术而非二期技术,以降低导管感染风险并缩短成熟时间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of patient-specific factors and outcomes for one- and two-stage basilic vein transposition fistulas.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1482-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
Comparative effectiveness of one-stage versus two-stage basilic vein transposition arteriovenous fistulas.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):529-535.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.115. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Basilic vein transposition: A viable alternative for multiple failed arteriovenous fistulas - A single center experience.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017 Mar-Apr;28(2):336-340. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.202781.
6
Basilic elevation transposition may improve the clinical outcomes for superficialization of basilic arteriovenous fistula veins.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):1104-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.081. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Comparison of one-stage and two-stage upper arm brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula in the Vascular Quality Initiative.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1187-1195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.049. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
9
Two-Stage Basilic Vein Transposition: Second Stage Results.
Ther Apher Dial. 2018 Feb;22(1):73-78. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12601. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
10
Long-term outcomes of staged basilic vein transposition for hemodialysis access in children.
J Vasc Access. 2017 Sep 11;18(5):366-370. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000778. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验