• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性应用抗生素与脓毒症患者炎症指标的相关性分析及其对预后的评估价值

The Preseptic Period and Inflammatory Markers in the Prediction of the Course of Sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sütçü Imam University School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Sütçü Imam University School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2018 May 27;24:3531-3539. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907687.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.907687
PMID:29804126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5998727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to find a simple and easily accessible scoring system that could predict the development of sepsis in the preseptic period. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 161 patients with a basal sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) value of 2 or more. The sepsis group (n=83) comprised patients with infection reported in culture results; the control group (n=78) comprised patients not showing evidence of infection in blood, urine, and phlegm cultures; samples were taken on three consecutive days. RESULTS The patients in both groups were divided into subgroups of non-survivor and survivor patients. The preseptic and septic SOFA score, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and procalcitonin (PRC) and lactate (Lac) values were determined to be statistically significantly higher in the sepsis group than in the control group. When the values related to sepsis were examined, a strong relationship was determined between sepsis and SOFA score, PRC values, and Lac values in the preseptic period and a weak relationship with NLR. In the model formed using multiple regression analysis with defined cutoff values for the preseptic and the septic periods, we found that in the septic period, a diagnosis of sepsis could be made with 83.8% accuracy. The diagnostic value of the same parameters evaluated in the preseptic period was 77.9%. CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic value of the combination of Lac, PRC, SOFA, and NLR were found to be similar in the preseptic period as the sepsis period; thus these combined values could safely be used for the early diagnosis of sepsis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在寻找一种简单且易于获取的评分系统,以预测脓毒症前期的发生。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 161 例基础序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)值≥2 分的患者。脓毒症组(n=83)包括培养结果报告感染的患者;对照组(n=78)包括血、尿和痰培养未显示感染证据的患者;连续三天采集样本。

结果

两组患者均分为非存活组和存活组。脓毒症组的非脓毒症和脓毒症 SOFA 评分、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、降钙素原(PRC)和乳酸(Lac)值均显著高于对照组。在评估与脓毒症相关的各项值时,我们发现脓毒症前期 SOFA 评分、PRC 值和 Lac 值与脓毒症之间存在较强的相关性,与 NLR 之间存在较弱的相关性。在采用多变量回归分析确定了脓毒症前期和脓毒症期的定义性截断值后构建的模型中,我们发现脓毒症期的诊断准确率为 83.8%。同样参数在脓毒症前期的诊断价值为 77.9%。

结论

在脓毒症前期,Lac、PRC、SOFA 和 NLR 联合诊断的价值与脓毒症期相似;因此,这些联合值可安全用于脓毒症的早期诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/00a9e3335707/medscimonit-24-3531-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/ab96f6b735de/medscimonit-24-3531-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/9d246370fcce/medscimonit-24-3531-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/c81a1b0a1068/medscimonit-24-3531-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/00a9e3335707/medscimonit-24-3531-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/ab96f6b735de/medscimonit-24-3531-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/9d246370fcce/medscimonit-24-3531-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/c81a1b0a1068/medscimonit-24-3531-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/5998727/00a9e3335707/medscimonit-24-3531-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Preseptic Period and Inflammatory Markers in the Prediction of the Course of Sepsis.预防性应用抗生素与脓毒症患者炎症指标的相关性分析及其对预后的评估价值
Med Sci Monit. 2018 May 27;24:3531-3539. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907687.
2
[Diagnostic and prognostic value of procalcitonin and common inflammatory markers combining SOFA score in patients with sepsis in early stage].[降钙素原及常见炎症标志物联合序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在脓毒症早期患者中的诊断及预后价值]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Jan;20(1):23-8.
3
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and plasma lactate predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血浆乳酸水平预测脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Sep;33(7):e22942. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22942. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Cell Free DNA and Procalcitonin as Early Markers of Complications in ICU Patients with Multiple Trauma and Major Surgery.游离DNA和降钙素原作为多发伤和大手术ICU患者并发症的早期标志物
Clin Lab. 2016 Dec 1;62(12):2395-2404. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160615.
5
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis and organ dysfunction.全身炎症反应综合征、脓毒症及器官功能障碍时的降钙素原和C反应蛋白
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R234-42. doi: 10.1186/cc2877. Epub 2004 Jun 10.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, C-reactive protein, and lactate in patients with suspected bacterial sepsis.降钙素原、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值、C反应蛋白及乳酸在疑似细菌性脓毒症患者中的诊断准确性
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181704. eCollection 2017.
7
Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio be independent risk factor for predicting acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis?中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值能否作为预测严重脓毒症患者急性肾损伤的独立危险因素?
Ren Fail. 2015 Mar;37(2):225-9. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.982477. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, white blood cells and SOFA score in ICU: diagnosis and monitoring of sepsis.重症监护病房中的降钙素原、C反应蛋白、白细胞及序贯器官衰竭评估评分:脓毒症的诊断与监测
Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 Jan-Feb;72(1-2):69-80.
9
Procalcitonin for early prediction of survival outcome in postoperative critically ill patients with severe sepsis.降钙素原用于术后严重脓毒症重症患者生存结局的早期预测
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Oct;97(4):503-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael181. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
10
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio as a Marker for Diagnosis and Prognostication of Sepsis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为脓毒症诊断和预后的标志物。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Jun;72(6):33-38. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0552.

引用本文的文献

1
Haemogram-Derived Indices for Screening and Prognostication in Critically Ill Septic Shock Patients: A Case-Control Study.血细胞分析衍生指标用于危重症感染性休克患者的筛查与预后评估:一项病例对照研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 27;10(9):638. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090638.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-marker approach using procalcitonin, presepsin, galectin-3, and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 for the prediction of mortality in sepsis.使用降钙素原、可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1、半乳糖凝集素-3和可溶性肿瘤抑制因子2的多标志物方法预测脓毒症死亡率
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0252-y. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Predictive Value of Serum Albumin Level for the Prognosis of Severe Sepsis Without Exogenous Human Albumin Administration: A Prospective Cohort Study.
血清白蛋白水平对未使用外源性人白蛋白的严重脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):687-694. doi: 10.1177/0885066616685300. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
4
Role of suPAR and Lactic Acid in Diagnosing Sepsis and Predicting Mortality in Elderly Patients.可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)和乳酸在老年患者脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测中的作用
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016 Jul 19;6(3):178-185. doi: 10.1556/1886.2016.00011. eCollection 2016 Sep 29.
5
Diagnosing sepsis - The role of laboratory medicine.诊断脓毒症——检验医学的作用。
Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Sep 1;460:203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在脓毒症患者中的预后意义:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:8191254. doi: 10.1155/2016/8191254. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
Reversal of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio in early versus late death from septic shock.脓毒性休克早期与晚期死亡中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值的逆转
Crit Care. 2015 Dec 16;19:439. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1144-x.
10
The utility of initial procalcitonin and procalcitonin clearance for prediction of bacterial infection and outcome in critically ill patients with autoimmune diseases: a prospective observational study.初始降钙素原及降钙素原清除率对自身免疫性疾病危重症患者细菌感染及预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 7;15:137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0122-9.