• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺移植在肺分配评分时代:来自单个中心的中期分析。

Lung transplantation in the Lung Allocation Score era: Medium-term analysis from a single center.

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2018 Aug;32(8):e13298. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13298. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.13298
PMID:29804306
Abstract

In 2005, the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) was implemented as the allocation system for lungs in the US. We sought to compare 5-year lung transplant outcomes before and after the institution of the LAS. Between 2000 and 2011, 501 adult patients were identified, with 132 from January 2000 to April 2005 (Pre-LAS era) and 369 from May 2005 to December 2011 (Post-LAS era). Kruskal-Wallis or chi-squared test was used to determine significance between groups. Survival was censored at 5 years. Overall, the post-LAS era was associated with more restrictive lung disease, higher LAS scores, shorter wait-list times, more preoperative immunosuppression, and more single lung transplantation. In addition, post-LAS patients had higher O requirements with greater preoperative pulmonary impairment. Postoperatively, 30-day mortality improved in post-LAS era (1.6% vs 5.3%, P = .048). During the pre- and post-LAS eras, 5-year survival was 52.3% and 55.3%, respectively (P = .414). The adjusted risk of mortality was not different in the post-LAS era (P = .139). Freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction was significantly higher in the post-LAS era (P = .002). In this single-center report, implementation of the LAS score has led to allocation to sicker patients without decrement in short- or medium-term outcomes. Freedom from CLAD at 5 years is improving after LAS implementation.

摘要

2005 年,美国实施了肺分配评分(LAS)作为肺分配系统。我们旨在比较 LAS 实施前后 5 年的肺移植结果。2000 年至 2011 年间,共确定了 501 例成人患者,其中 132 例来自 2000 年 1 月至 2005 年 4 月(LAS 前时代),369 例来自 2005 年 5 月至 2011 年 12 月(LAS 后时代)。Kruskal-Wallis 或卡方检验用于确定组间的显著性。生存截止到 5 年。总体而言,LAS 后时代与更具限制性的肺部疾病、更高的 LAS 评分、更短的等待时间、更多的术前免疫抑制和更多的单肺移植有关。此外,LAS 后时代的患者术前肺功能障碍更大,需要更高的 O 需求。术后,LAS 后时代的 30 天死亡率有所改善(1.6%对 5.3%,P=0.048)。在 LAS 前和 LAS 后时代,5 年生存率分别为 52.3%和 55.3%(P=0.414)。LAS 后时代的死亡率调整风险无差异(P=0.139)。LAS 后时代慢性肺移植物功能障碍的无复发率明显更高(P=0.002)。在这项单中心报告中,LAS 评分的实施导致分配给病情更严重的患者,但并未降低短期或中期结果。LAS 实施后,5 年无 CLAD 的自由正在改善。

相似文献

1
Lung transplantation in the Lung Allocation Score era: Medium-term analysis from a single center.肺移植在肺分配评分时代:来自单个中心的中期分析。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Aug;32(8):e13298. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13298. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Lung allocation score predicts survival in lung transplantation patients with pulmonary fibrosis.肺分配评分预测肺纤维化肺移植患者的生存。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):1757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.005.
3
Effect of the lung allocation score on lung transplantation in the United States.肺分配评分对美国肺移植的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Apr;35(4):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
4
Lung Transplant Mortality Is Improving in Recipients With a Lung Allocation Score in the Upper Quartile.肺分配评分处于上四分位数的肺移植受者的死亡率正在改善。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1607-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.057. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Five-year experience using the Lung Allocation Score: the Munich Lung Transplant Group.使用肺分配评分的五年经验:慕尼黑肺移植组。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Aug 1;54(2):328-333. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy035.
6
Gender differences in long-term survival post-transplant: A single-institution analysis in the lung allocation score era.移植后长期生存的性别差异:肺分配评分时代的单机构分析
Clin Transplant. 2017 Mar;31(3). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12889. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Too high for transplantation? Single-center analysis of the lung allocation score.对于移植来说过高了?肺分配评分的单中心分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.083. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Lung allocation score for lung transplantation: impact on disease severity and survival.肺移植的肺分配评分:对疾病严重程度和生存的影响。
Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1954-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1160.
9
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome occurs earlier in the post-lung allocation score era.肺分配评分时代后,闭塞性细支气管炎综合征更早发生。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 May;141(5):1278-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.12.025. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Double lung transplants have significantly improved survival compared with single lung transplants in high lung allocation score patients.与单肺移植相比,双肺移植显著提高了高肺分配评分患者的生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.072. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Practice patterns and patient outcomes.体外膜肺氧合作为肺移植的桥梁:实践模式和患者结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jan;43(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Acute Kidney Injury after Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肺移植术后急性肾损伤:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 17;8(10):1713. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101713.