Suppr超能文献

I-FP-CIT单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)与神经黑色素磁共振成像(MRI)联合应用在鉴别帕金森病与其他帕金森综合征中的效用。

The utility of the combined use of I-FP-CIT SPECT and neuromelanin MRI in differentiating Parkinson's disease from other parkinsonian syndromes.

作者信息

Matsusue Eiji, Fujihara Yoshio, Tanaka Kenichiro, Aozasa Yuki, Shimoda Manabu, Nakayasu Hiroyuki, Nakamura Kazuhiko, Ogawa Toshihide

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Japan.

2 Department of Neurology, Tottori prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2019 Feb;60(2):230-238. doi: 10.1177/0284185118778871. Epub 2018 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging (NmMRI) and I-FP-CIT dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT) provide specific information that distinguishes Parkinson's disease (PD) from non-degenerative parkinsonian syndrome (NDPS).

PURPOSE

To determine whether a multiparametric scoring system (MSS) could improve accuracy compared to each parameter of DAT-SPECT and NmMRI in differentiating PD from NDPS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 49 patients, including 14 with NDPS, 30 with PD, and five with atypical parkinsonian disorder (APD) underwent both NmMRI and DAT-SPECT and were evaluated. The average (Ave) and the asymmetry index (AI) were calculated in the substantia nigra compacta area (SNc-area), SNc midbrain-tegmentum contrast ratio (SNc-CR), and specific binding ratio (SBR). Cut-off values were determined, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, for the differentiation of PD from NDPS on the statistically significant parameters. All cases were scored as either 1 (PD) or 0 (NDPS) for each parameter according to its threshold. These individual scores were totaled for each case, yielding a combined score for each case to obtain a cut-off value for the MSS.

RESULTS

The Ave-SNc-area, Ave-SNc-CR, and Ave-SBR in PD were significantly lower than those in NDPS. The AI-SNc-area and AI-SBR in PD were significantly higher than those in NDPS. Of the five parameters, the highest accuracy was 93% for the Ave-SNc-area. For the MSS, a cut-off value of 3 was the accuracy of 96%. Besides, no significant difference was observed between PD and APD on all parameters.

CONCLUSION

An MSS has comparable or better accuracy compared to each parameter of DAT-SPECT and NmMRI in distinguishing PD from NDPS.

摘要

背景

神经黑色素磁共振成像(NmMRI)和碘氟苯腈多巴胺转运体单光子发射计算机断层扫描(DAT-SPECT)提供了可将帕金森病(PD)与非退行性帕金森综合征(NDPS)区分开来的特定信息。

目的

确定与DAT-SPECT和NmMRI的各参数相比,多参数评分系统(MSS)在区分PD和NDPS时是否能提高准确性。

材料与方法

共49例患者接受了NmMRI和DAT-SPECT检查并进行评估,其中包括14例NDPS患者、30例PD患者和5例非典型帕金森病(APD)患者。计算黑质致密部区域(SNc区)的平均值(Ave)和不对称指数(AI)、SNc中脑-被盖对比度(SNc-CR)以及特异性结合率(SBR)。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析确定在具有统计学意义的参数上区分PD和NDPS的临界值。根据每个参数的阈值,所有病例的每个参数均评分为1(PD)或0(NDPS)。将每个病例的这些个体评分相加得出每个病例的综合评分,从而获得MSS的临界值。

结果

PD患者的Ave-SNc区、Ave-SNc-CR和Ave-SBR显著低于NDPS患者。PD患者的AI-SNc区和AI-SBR显著高于NDPS患者。在这五个参数中,Ave-SNc区的最高准确率为93%。对于MSS,临界值为3时准确率为96%。此外,在所有参数上,PD和APD之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

在区分PD和NDPS方面,与DAT-SPECT和NmMRI的各参数相比,MSS具有相当或更高的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验