Weale Ross, Kong Victor, Manchev Vassil, Bekker Wanda, Oosthuizen George, Brysiewicz Petra, Laing Grant, Bruce John, Clarke Damian
From the Department of General Surgery, Wessex Deanery, Wessex, United Kingdom (Weale); Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa (Kong, Manchev, Bekker, Oosthuizen, Laing, Bruce, Clarke); the School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa (Brysiewicz); and the Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Clarke).
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):158-164. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009717.
Intra-abdominal vascular injury (IAVI) is uncommon but continues to be associated with high mortality rates despite technological advances in the past decades. In light of these ongoing developments, we reviewed our contemporary experience with IAVI in an attempt to clarify and refine our management strategies and the outcome of these patients.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2014 at a major trauma centre in South Africa who were found to have an IAVI during laparotomy for trauma. We collected demographic and clinical data including mechanism of injury, location and severity of the injury, concurrent injuries, physiologic parameters and clinical outcome.
We identified 110 patients with IAVIs, of whom 98 had sustained penetrating injuries (55 gunshot wounds and 43 stab wounds). There were 84 arterial injuries (including 21 renal and 17 mesenteric) and 74 venous injuries (including 21 renal and 17 inferior vena caval). Combined venous and arterial injuries were found in almost one-third of patients (34 [30.9%]). Fifty-seven patients (51.8%) required intensive care admission. The overall mortality rate was 28.2% (31 patients); the rate was 62% for aortic injuries and 47% for inferior vena cava injuries. Liver injury, large bowel injury, splenic injury and elevated lactate level were all associated with a statistically significantly higher mortality rate.
The mortality rate for IAVI remains high despite decades of operative experience in high-volume centres. Open operative techniques alone are unlikely to achieve further reduction in mortality rates. Integration of endovascular techniques may provide an alternative strategy to improve outcomes.
腹腔内血管损伤(IAVI)并不常见,但尽管在过去几十年技术有所进步,其死亡率仍然很高。鉴于这些持续的发展,我们回顾了我们在IAVI方面的当代经验,试图阐明并完善我们的管理策略以及这些患者的治疗结果。
我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2014年12月期间在南非一家主要创伤中心因创伤行剖腹手术时发现有IAVI的所有患者的病历。我们收集了人口统计学和临床数据,包括损伤机制、损伤部位和严重程度、并发损伤、生理参数和临床结果。
我们确定了110例IAVI患者,其中98例为穿透伤(55例枪伤和43例刺伤)。有84例动脉损伤(包括21例肾动脉和17例肠系膜动脉)和74例静脉损伤(包括21例肾静脉和17例下腔静脉)。近三分之一的患者(34例[30.9%])发现有动静脉联合损伤。57例患者(51.8%)需要入住重症监护病房。总体死亡率为28.2%(31例患者);主动脉损伤的死亡率为62%,下腔静脉损伤的死亡率为47%。肝损伤、大肠损伤、脾损伤和乳酸水平升高均与统计学上显著更高的死亡率相关。
尽管在高容量中心有几十年的手术经验,但IAVI的死亡率仍然很高。仅开放手术技术不太可能进一步降低死亡率。血管内技术的整合可能提供一种改善治疗结果的替代策略。