• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神健康消费者参与本科职业治疗专业学生评估:无负面影响。

Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact.

作者信息

Logan Alexandra, Yule Elisa, Taylor Michael, Imms Christine

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):494-502. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12484. Epub 2018 May 28.

DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12484
PMID:29806906
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer - as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit - impacted engagement, anxiety states and academic performance of undergraduate occupational therapy students.

METHODS

Students (n = 131 eligible) self-selected into two groups but were blinded to the group differences (assessor panel composition) until shortly prior to the oral assessment. Control group assessors were two occupational therapy educators, while consumer group assessors included an occupational therapy educator and a mental health consumer.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-assessment data were successfully matched for 79 students (overall response rate = 73.1%). No evidence was found of significant differences between the two groups for engagement, anxiety or academic performance (all P values >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Including mental health consumers as assessors did not negatively impact student engagement and academic performance, nor increase student anxiety beyond that typically observed in oral assessment tasks. The findings provide support for expanding the role of mental health consumers in the education and assessment of occupational therapy students. Development of methods to determine the efficacy of consumer involvement remains an area for future research.

摘要

背景/目的:澳大利亚职业治疗课程的认证标准要求消费者参与课程的设计、实施和评估。本研究调查了作为心理健康科口试两名评估者之一的心理健康消费者,是否会影响本科职业治疗专业学生的参与度、焦虑状态和学业成绩。

方法

学生(n = 131名符合条件)自行选择分为两组,但在口试前不久才知晓组间差异(评估小组组成)。对照组评估者为两名职业治疗教育工作者,而消费者组评估者包括一名职业治疗教育工作者和一名心理健康消费者。

结果

成功匹配了79名学生的评估前和评估后数据(总体回复率 = 73.1%)。未发现两组在参与度、焦虑或学业成绩方面存在显著差异(所有P值>0.05)。

结论

将心理健康消费者纳入评估者并未对学生的参与度和学业成绩产生负面影响,也未使学生焦虑超过口试任务中通常观察到的水平。研究结果为扩大心理健康消费者在职业治疗专业学生教育和评估中的作用提供了支持。确定消费者参与效果的方法开发仍是未来研究的一个领域。

相似文献

1
Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact.精神健康消费者参与本科职业治疗专业学生评估:无负面影响。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):494-502. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12484. Epub 2018 May 28.
2
Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula.向消费者学习:一项关于澳大利亚心理健康消费者对以康复为导向课程的优先事项的电子德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):586-597. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12518. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Mental health consumer involvement in occupational therapy education in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区精神健康消费者参与职业治疗教育的情况。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Feb;67(1):83-93. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12634. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Mental health consumer participation in education: a structured literature review.精神卫生消费者参与教育:一项结构化文献综述
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Oct;62(5):341-62. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12205. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
The impact of face-to-face mental health consumer-led teaching on occupational therapy student empathy levels: Two group comparison design.面对面心理健康消费者主导教学对职业治疗学生同理心水平的影响:两组比较设计。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):703-713. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12833. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Identifying educational priorities for occupational therapy students to prepare for mental health practice in Australia and New Zealand: Opinions of practising occupational therapists.确定澳大利亚和新西兰职业治疗专业学生为心理健康实践做准备的教育重点:执业职业治疗师的意见。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Oct;62(5):286-98. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12194. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Physiotherapy clinical educators' perceptions of student fitness to practise.物理治疗临床教育工作者对学生实践能力的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0847-2.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of embedded simulation in occupational therapy clinical practice education: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.职业治疗临床实践教育中嵌入式模拟的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2087-0.
9
Simulated versus traditional occupational therapy placements: A randomised controlled trial.模拟与传统职业治疗实习:一项随机对照试验。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):556-564. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12513. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
Nursing student attitudes to people labelled with 'mental illness' and consumer participation: A survey-based analysis of findings and psychometric properties.护理专业学生对被贴上“精神疾病”标签的人的态度和消费者参与度:基于调查的发现和心理测量学特性分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Describing consumer involvement, recruitment, retention in Australian occupational therapy university education: A cross sectional survey.描述澳大利亚职业治疗大学教育中的消费者参与、招募和保留情况:一项横断面调查。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Aug;85(8):585-594. doi: 10.1177/03080226211064475. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.探索用于职业治疗专业学生实习期间学习的消费者反馈系统概念:一项范围综述
Aust Occup Ther J. 2024 Dec;71(6):1089-1105. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12984. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Learning from lived experience: Outcomes associated with students' involvement in co-designed and co-delivered recovery-oriented practice workshops.
从生活经验中学习:学生参与共同设计和共同提供以康复为导向的实践工作坊的相关结果。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):714-722. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12837. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
The impact of face-to-face mental health consumer-led teaching on occupational therapy student empathy levels: Two group comparison design.面对面心理健康消费者主导教学对职业治疗学生同理心水平的影响:两组比较设计。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):703-713. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12833. Epub 2022 Aug 10.