• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环形钢板与非环形钢板治疗肩胛体移位骨折:一项平均随访5年的回顾性研究

Ring versus non-ring plate for the treatment of displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

作者信息

Yuan Zheng, Zhang Fan, Liang Guanzhao, Zeng Xianshang, Liu Dan, Yang Chen, Yu Weiguang, Zhang Qiang, Zhang Xinchao

机构信息

1 Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

2 Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2018 Jul;46(7):2731-2742. doi: 10.1177/0300060518770568. Epub 2018 May 29.

DOI:10.1177/0300060518770568
PMID:29808730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6124297/
Abstract

Objective To compare surgical complications and functional outcomes of the ring plate versus the non-ring plate approach to the surgical repair of scapular body fractures (SBFs; AO/OTA classification: 14-A2.2). Methods This retrospective study reviewed data from adults with SBFs who underwent a modified Judet approach combined with non-ring or ring plates between November 2006 and June 2013. The primary outcomes were the Constant and Murley score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. The secondary outcomes were radiographic findings. Results A total of 318 patients had a non-ring or ring plate internal fixation, of which 147 patients (ring-treated, n = 72; non-ring-treated, n = 75) were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 60 months. At the 3-month follow-up, the complication rate was 2.8% and 13.3% for the ring-treated and non-ring-treated groups, respectively. The difference persisted over time, with significantly different rates of 8.3% and 20.0% at the final follow-up for the ring and non-ring groups, respectively. The ring-treated group had significantly higher postoperative Constant and Murley scores and lower DASH scores compared with the non-ring-treated group. Conclusion Application of a modified Judet approach combined with ring plate internal fixation for the treatment of SBFs may be the preferred treatment option.

摘要

目的 比较环形钢板与非环形钢板治疗肩胛体骨折(SBF;AO/OTA分类:14-A2.2)的手术并发症及功能结局。方法 本回顾性研究回顾了2006年11月至2013年6月期间接受改良Judet入路联合非环形或环形钢板治疗的成年SBF患者的数据。主要结局指标为Constant和Murley评分以及上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。次要结局指标为影像学表现。结果 共有318例患者接受了非环形或环形钢板内固定,其中147例患者(环形钢板治疗组,n = 72;非环形钢板治疗组,n = 75)接受评估,平均随访时间为60个月。在3个月随访时,环形钢板治疗组和非环形钢板治疗组的并发症发生率分别为2.8%和13.3%。这种差异随时间持续存在,在最终随访时,环形钢板组和非环形钢板组的并发症发生率分别为8.3%和20.0%,差异有统计学意义。与非环形钢板治疗组相比,环形钢板治疗组术后Constant和Murley评分显著更高,DASH评分更低。结论 应用改良Judet入路联合环形钢板内固定治疗SBF可能是首选的治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/6124297/62bb0e337738/10.1177_0300060518770568-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/6124297/3ee603b5b207/10.1177_0300060518770568-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/6124297/62bb0e337738/10.1177_0300060518770568-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/6124297/3ee603b5b207/10.1177_0300060518770568-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/6124297/62bb0e337738/10.1177_0300060518770568-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Ring versus non-ring plate for the treatment of displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.环形钢板与非环形钢板治疗肩胛体移位骨折:一项平均随访5年的回顾性研究
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jul;46(7):2731-2742. doi: 10.1177/0300060518770568. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: Does it really make a difference?保留冈下肌手术入路治疗肩胛骨折后的功能结局及临床强度评估:真的有区别吗?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Sep 5;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-018-0509-8.
3
Modified Judet approach and minifragment fixation of scapular body and glenoid neck fractures.改良Judet入路及肩胛骨体部和肩胛盂颈部骨折的微型接骨板固定
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Sep;23(8):558-64. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a18216.
4
Functional outcomes of extra-articular scapula fracture fixation with distal humeral Y-type locking plate: a retrospective study.关节外肩胛骨骨折固定采用肱骨远端 Y 型锁定钢板的功能结果:回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jun 13;14(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1205-y.
5
Surgical treatment of scapular fractures: Results and complications.肩胛骨折的手术治疗:结果和并发症。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52 Suppl 5:S38-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Single lateral versus medial and lateral plates for treating displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective comparative study.单外侧与内外侧钢板治疗移位肩胛体骨折:回顾性对比研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.028. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Functional Outcomes After Operative Management of Extra-Articular Glenoid Neck and Scapular Body Fractures.关节外肩胛盂颈部和肩胛体骨折手术治疗后的功能结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1623-1630. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01224.
8
Single, superiorly placed reconstruction plate compared with flexible intramedullary nailing for midshaft clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.单块高位放置重建钢板与弹性髓内钉治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):620-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00497.
9
Surgical and functional outcomes after operative management of complex and displaced intra-articular glenoid fractures.复杂移位关节内肩胛盂骨折手术治疗的手术和功能结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):645-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00896.
10
Operative treatment of dislocated midshaft clavicular fractures: plate or intramedullary nail fixation? A randomized controlled trial.锁骨中段骨折脱位的手术治疗:钢板还是髓内钉固定?一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):613-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00449.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula.肩胛骨关节外骨折的钛解剖板和钛重建板治疗的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 23;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03614-x.
2
Functional Outcome of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Extra-Articular Scapula Fractures.移位性关节外肩胛骨骨折切开复位内固定术的功能预后
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Oct 31;55(3):708-713. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00297-y. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic comparison of the closed shoulder reduction techniques.闭合性肩关节复位技术的系统比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 May;137(5):589-599. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2648-4. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Functional Outcomes After Operative Management of Extra-Articular Glenoid Neck and Scapular Body Fractures.关节外肩胛盂颈部和肩胛体骨折手术治疗后的功能结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1623-1630. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01224.
3
Early Results of Scapular Fractures Treated Operatively at a Level One Trauma Center.
一级创伤中心手术治疗肩胛骨折的早期结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Feb;34(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-7041-5. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
4
A Comparison of Exposure Between the Classic and Modified Judet Approaches to the Scapula.经典Judet入路与改良Judet入路治疗肩胛骨时的暴露情况比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30(5):235-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000486.
5
Quantitative comparison of exposure for the posterior Judet approach to the scapula with and without deltoid takedown.肩胛下入路中是否切断三角肌对肩胛骨暴露的定量比较
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1747-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 May 24.
6
A meta-analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment in 463 scapular neck fractures.肩胛颈骨折 463 例手术与非手术治疗的荟萃分析
Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):69-76. doi: 10.1177/1457496913482251.
7
Scapula fractures: interobserver reliability of classification and treatment.肩胛骨骨折:分类和治疗的观察者间可靠性。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):124-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829673e2.
8
Management of scapular fractures.肩胛骨折的处理。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Mar;20(3):130-41. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-03-130.
9
Analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced scapular fractures.手术与非手术治疗移位肩胛骨折的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3379-89. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2016-6.
10
[Operative treatment of comminuted scapular body fractures via lateral and modified Judet approach].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Mar;24(3):259-60.