Borges Nattai R, Reaburn Peter R, Doering Thomas M, Argus Christos K, Driller Matthew W
a School of Medical and Applied Sciences , Central Queensland University , Rockhampton , Australia.
b School of Environmental and Life Sciences , University of Newcastle , Ourimbah , Australia.
Exp Aging Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;44(4):338-349. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1477361. Epub 2018 May 29.
The purpose of this study was to compare physical performance, perceptual and haematological markers of recovery in well-trained masters and young cyclists across 48 h following a bout of repeated high-intensity interval exercise.
Nine masters (mean ± SD; age = 55.6 ± 5.0 years) and eight young (age = 25.9 ± 3.0 years) cyclists performed a high-intensity interval exercise session consisting of 6 × 30 s intervals at 175% peak power output with 4.5 min rest between efforts. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 10 s sprint (10SST), 30-min time trial (30TT) performance, creatine kinase concentration (CK) and perceptual measures of motivation, total recovery, fatigue and muscle soreness were collected at baseline and at standardised time points across the 48 h recovery period.
No significant group-time interactions were observed for performance of MVC, 10SST, 30TT and CK (P > 0.05). A significant reduction in 10SST peak power was found in both masters (P = 0.002) and young (P = 0.003) cyclists at 1 h post exercise, however, both groups physically recovered at similar rates. Neither group showed significant (P > 0.05) or practically meaningful increases in CK (%∆ < 10%). A significant age-related difference was found for perceptual fatigue (P = 0.01) and analysis of effect size (ES) showed that perceptual recovery was delayed with masters cyclists reporting lower motivation (ES ±90%CI = 0.69 ± 0.77, moderate), greater fatigue (ES = 0.75 ± 0.93, moderate) and muscle soreness (ES = 0.61 ± 0.70, moderate) after 48 h of recovery.
The delay in perceived recovery may have negative effects on long-term participation to systematic training.
本研究的目的是比较训练有素的成年和年轻自行车运动员在进行一轮重复高强度间歇运动后的48小时内的身体表现、恢复的感知和血液学指标。
九名成年自行车运动员(平均±标准差;年龄=55.6±5.0岁)和八名年轻自行车运动员(年龄=25.9±3.0岁)进行了一次高强度间歇运动,包括6次30秒的间歇,功率输出为峰值功率的175%,每次间歇之间休息4.5分钟。在基线以及48小时恢复期的标准化时间点收集最大自主收缩(MVC)、10秒冲刺(10SST)、30分钟计时赛(30TT)表现、肌酸激酶浓度(CK)以及动机、总体恢复、疲劳和肌肉酸痛的感知指标。
在MVC、10SST、30TT和CK的表现方面未观察到显著的组-时间交互作用(P>0.05)。运动后1小时,成年和年轻自行车运动员的10SST峰值功率均显著降低(成年组P=0.002,年轻组P=0.003),然而,两组的身体恢复速度相似。两组的CK均未出现显著(P>0.05)或实际有意义的升高(%∆<10%)。在感知疲劳方面发现了显著的年龄相关差异(P=0.01),效应量(ES)分析表明,成年自行车运动员的感知恢复延迟,在恢复48小时后,他们报告的动机较低(ES±90%CI=0.69±0.77,中等)、疲劳感更强(ES=0.75±0.93,中等)和肌肉酸痛更明显(ES=0.61±0.70,中等)。
感知恢复的延迟可能对长期参与系统训练产生负面影响。